Guest guest Posted August 14, 2008 Report Share Posted August 14, 2008 I am getting hopelessly confused. I read info on the China Study here: http://www.thechinastudy.com/ then I read a powerful rebuttal to the China study here: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/China-Study.html Then I read the response to the rebuttal here: http://www.vegsource.com/articles2/campbell_china_response.htm Then I read the response to the response here: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/-Masterjohn.html Now I am lost. The most powerful argment I read AGAINST the China study dealt with various human groups that eat 100% animal products, and who are remarkably healthy!!! Two notable groups are the Masai tribesmen in Africa, whose diet consists of almost 100% cow's milk and blood, and the eskimos, who consume 100% seal, whale, walrus, etc. meat and blubber. So -- perhaps diet is NOT the deciding factor in cancer??? Perhaps the sole deciding factor is pollutants? Or maybe it's sugar, but nothing else matters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.