Re: Re: stage 4 ca -- China

[Guest guest]

and Beatrice,

I think it is a very poor argument that the top people in a

country go to a certain clinic or hospital. A perfect example of

that is the US. We are a country with tens of thousands of people

who are undeniably wealthy in terms of money and extremely important

in terms of enjoying legions of fawning sycophants. The vast

majority of these very important people, when diagnosed with advanced

cancer, choose a US institution that will focus on little more than

technological pageantry and then the bequest.

That said, if a person is diligent, has very good Chinese

connections and is comfortable in the absence of the familiar, then

it would be hard to do better than to go to China for medical

treatment. The quality of medical care is as good as it gets, there

is easy access to almost anything you want, and the prices are

unbelievably low.

Three cheers for China,

At 10:09 PM 4/8/2009, you wrote:

>Hi ;

>

>Don't know how hard it is to register and count everyone that enters

>your door and see how they are doing after 5 years.

>

>If 67 out of 100 are cancer free that makes 67% even if 20 out of

>the remainig 33 have died.

>

>The chairman of the biggest (and of course the most expensive)

>hospital here in the county is a personal friend, they are just

>about to open the most advanced hospital in Asia.

>

>He was with us in China togehter with his head of Bioresearch and

>his medical director for 2 weeks, they guy speaks chinese so he had

>ample opportunity to talk to doctors, nurses and patients, which he

>did all the time.

>

>Now when his friends and family members get cancer, he sends them

>all to the Sanzao Cell Transplant center and none to his own brand

>new hospital - get the picture?

>

>Yes, you are right, they do not reveal to the last detail how their

>CIK-Pack therapy works -simply because they don't have to, they run

>near full capacity by word of mouth.

>

>They are in a military hospital and treat the top brass of the

>country; these guys are more influential and powerful than the

>politicinas there - do you really think they have room for a lot of mistakes?

>

>We keep telling about that treatment option because we found them by

>shear luck and we know its a great opportunity to get on the long

>term survivors list.

>

>My wife is GBM free today, 16 month after her oncologist gave her 3

>weeks till recurrance because she stopped all conventional therapies

>very early on.

>

>Its all a matter of choice, everyone paves his own path as we thread

>along - as long as we share the best we have to offer in a selfless

>manner - we feel atune with the infinite source.

>

>kind regards; & Beatrice

>

>VGammill <vgammill@...> wrote:

> >

> > I have no idea if this therapy has any merit, but the website

> spews nonsense. " The sucess rate of remission and non-recurrence of

> all kinds of cancers in all stages is 67% ! "

> >

> > How can they say this. My success rate with local skin cancers is

> > 100% but my success rate with cancers with multiple organ failure

> is 0%. Any clinic can get any success rate they want as long as they

> > prescreen. Yes, and any one who dies during treatment is

> > " unevaluable " and is tossed from the study.

> >

> > Dendritic cell therapy is a term that is very loosely used and we

> > don't have any idea of what they are discussing until they spell

> it out. There are some great therapies available in China, but this one

> > doesn't ring true.

> >

> >

>

>

>No virus found in this incoming message.

>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

>Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.48/2048 - Release Date:

>04/08/09 19:02:00