Guest guest Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hello Jan, Leaving out CoQ-10 (ubiquinone) with paw paw is not so much about it being an antioxidant. Paw paw is a co-factor in the electron transport chain. It is active in complex 1 of that chain. This is the step that is inhibited by annonaceous acetogenins, the active components of paw paw. Mike Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 2:31:35 PM, you wrote: JK> A thought. Since Paw Paw reduced ATP, one of the things I did JK> was make myself a list of all the supplements and everything I JK> take, and then looked them up on the internet, one at a time, to JK> find out if they had any impact on ATP, and included them or JK> excluded them based on that information. Jan JK> JK> From: jrrjim <jim.mcelroy10@...> JK> Subject: [ ] Paw Paw protocol? JK> JK> Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 3:12 PM JK> I know posts have been made many times on paw paw protocols. I also JK> know that the thought on these protocols is changing, perhaps JK> evolving. I was wondering if some knowledgable people could either JK> give a good paw paw protocol (in terms of the most recent concepts in JK> this area) or point me in the right direction. JK> Specifically, I am looking for what to leave out of a protocol with paw JK> paw. JK> I'm pretty sure Coenzyme Q10 is one of the elements to avoid. I'm a JK> little confused on other antioxidants. JK> I believe that at one time, FO /CC were left out, but now they are JK> considered okay. JK> JK> JK> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2009 Report Share Posted January 30, 2009 i have a question on pawpaw and graviola. It is said both contain acetegonin which affects ATP of cancer cells and without harming normal cells? Is this a legitimate claim? Can acetegonin identify which is a cancer cell or not? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 Dear , why don't you google Paw Paw Reg Cel and see what is written in it. However I have attached the saved page for you. By reducing this voltage level from 70 to 110 mv to something in the 50 mv region, normal cells can still function. However, cancer and viral cells cannot process energy at this low voltage level and start to starve. The process of starving is a slower process than being poisoned which is why Paw Paw works slower than chemo. When Paw Paw does not work, it is usually because it is not absorbed sufficiently into the cells of the body to cause this voltage reduction. Both Cantron and Protocel are designed to cause this voltage reduction. If Paw Paw does not work for a person, Cantron or Protocel may work. The pharmacology of Cantron and Protocel have an expanded explanation for the role ATP energy reduction in cancer treatment, for this text see the developer's explanation summarized by the webmaster Winter . Vishwajith / Sri Lanka ________________________________ From: Bag <@...> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 Subject: Re:[2]:Paw Paw protocol? i have a question on pawpaw and graviola. It is said both contain acetegonin which affects ATP of cancer cells and without harming normal cells? Is this a legitimate claim? Can acetegonin identify which is a cancer cell or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.