Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 Yes I agree it is not a cure but a lot like diabetes in that it needs to be managed as a chronic disease for the rest of my life. I do have a friend whose mother was sent home with stage four lung cancer, the drs said they could do no more. She went to Dr. Kelley way back in the 60s and went through quite a rough time getting better. I speak to the daughter who says she had to help her mother as she was pretty sick and would look after her giving her the coffee enemas and there were many times when she was throwing up, coughing, just really sick, but she survived to live until well into her 70s and died of a heart attack. The daughter of this lung cancer patient has two children one who was really sick with what they thought was a brain infection and she went to 17 doctors who could not figure out what was wrong. She took her to Dr. and she has been getting better ever since. Her other child, a boy, got sick after an immunization at a young age and his reflexes are not so good anymore, Dr. figured out how to get him well. So, he is not only a cancer dr but is able to figure out how to take care of other illnesses. He studied all of Dr. Kelley's files for a few years and was so impressed with his ability that he started his own practice following Dr. Kelley's methods. His associate Dr. Isaacs also is a great dr. This woman is my support group and cheers me on when I am feeling down, and she has a lot of confidence in Dr. G for taking care of her entire family. Lois Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 Steve, I cannot provide actual numbers, however I do know several people who were not successful with his program. The reason I wrote my post was as follows. My husband battled lung cancer (never smoked or worked with any sort of chemicals) for a full year with alternative therapies. We went to see several different practitioners, followed the diet, exercise, supplements, etc. that were prescribed. We spent a week with in California and followed all his recommendations as well. Unfortunately for my husband it was not enough and he did not succeed. I know that there are many people who succeed at keeping cancer at bay through alternative therapies and if I were to get a diagnosis, I would follow that route as well. So I am not knocking alternative therapies and I am not knocking Dr. either. I just think that there are people out there who follow the alternative forums and hear the wonderful stories of success who then believe that it works for everyone and I think everyone should keep in mind that nothing works for everyone. One must have hope but but realistic at the same time. Everyone needs to understand that just as traditional medicine does not work for everyone, neither do the alternative therapies. Those for whom it has worked should make their successes known but those reading about it, need to keep in mind that there are no guarantees and that what has worked for one person, may not necessarily work for another. I wish everyone battling this ugly disease the best of health. Nili On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:52 AM, steve_lmcs <lmcs@...> wrote: > > > Nili > > It seems like you may have some sort of statistics on Dr. ' success > rate. Can you provide actual numbers and your source ? > I don't think we can use the word cure since, in more than one interview > and/or his books, he doesnt use that word. He treats cancer as a chronic > disease akin to diabetes, where the patient needs to manage it for the rest > of their life. > > I follow a protocol similar to his using enzymes, diet and detoxification > and believe his approach is valid. Often times we forget that Dr. > simply followed in Dr. Kelley's footsteps. And while he too > was not 100%, Dr. Kelley had a great deal of success. Many of his patients > were sent home to die by traditional medicine. And their body's were > horribly damaged from chemo, radiation, etc. > > Dr. Kelley and Dr. ' program is all about tailoring for specific > individuals toxicity, metabolic type and their specific cancer. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 In my opinion if someone can have a tumor removed by surgery without a lot of damage and they have clear margins do that, then do alternative cancer methods. Thanks, Robyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 This assumes that there will be no damage and that clear margins will be the result even then, one has to wonder whether this is the right course. I disagree with the premise but I am glad Robin, you did say “in my opinion†and not that this was really the best way. This is the correct way to make statements that have such a far-reaching potential. When we speak surgery in cancer, we must also think ‘seeding’ of Cancer cells, something we cannot be sure will not happen. The very existence of this list came about because it was formed by its founder/s that did not believe the first course of action should be invasive procedures. This does not negate the possibility that surgery might be necessary but that is different from what was stated. Joe C. From: robyn howell Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Re: Dr. ' program for those looking for alternative cancer cure In my opinion if someone can have a tumor removed by surgery without a lot of damage and they have clear margins do that, then do alternative cancer methods. Thanks, Robyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 Joe, The only reason I say this is I know several people who have had surgery with great success (skipped the chemo and radiation) and I didnt have surgery on a small lump in my breast and now its all over in me. ________________________________ From: JoeCastron <jcastron1@...> Sent: Tue, March 29, 2011 This assumes that there will be no damage and that clear margins will be the result even then, one has to wonder whether this is the right course. I disagree with the premise but I am glad Robin, you did say 'in my opinion' and not that this was really the best way. This is the correct way to make statements that have such a far-reaching potential. When we speak surgery in cancer, we must also think 'seeding' of Cancer cells, something we cannot be sure will not happen. The very existence of this list came about because it was formed by its founder/s that did not believe the first course of action should be invasive procedures. This does not negate the possibility that surgery might be necessary but that is different from what was stated. Joe C. From: robyn howell Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 In my opinion if someone can have a tumor removed by surgery without a lot of damage and they have clear margins do that, then do alternative cancer methods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 Most normal people would come to the same conclusion you did and who wouldn’t? At least for a while then we have to not kick ourselves for not taking the steps other have. Do not make the mistake of blaming yourself because it isn’t productive. There are many that have done what you think might have been better that are in even worse condition. Somewhere on my computer is a study that shows many bladder cancer recurrences are the result of surgery that caused a ‘seeding’ of the cancer cells and I think back on my second and third recurrence and have an explanation for it..........maybe. Another thing we cannot do is compare our results with someone else or even a few others. We are all different and some cancers do not result in what we are all trying to avoid. Your goal now is to win the game because it isn’t over any more than it is over for those others that had “great successâ€. There are cases that do nothing and their cancers have “mysteriously†disappeared. This is not alternative talk, this was gleaned from a medical source and they were so dumbfounded some Practitioners have decided that perhaps more of a ‘wait and see’ rather than a quick........â€let’s cut it out and burn everything else†might be the way to go. Besides not spelling your name correctly, I want you to know there was not intent to belittle what you said because you said it in earnest. It just didn’t seem that it should go unanswered because of the influence words have upon people. Good luck in your battle, Joe C. From: robyn howell Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:11 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Re: Dr. ' program for those looking for alternative cancer cure Joe, The only reason I say this is I know several people who have had surgery with great success (skipped the chemo and radiation) and I didnt have surgery on a small lump in my breast and now its all over in me. ________________________________ From: JoeCastron <mailto:jcastron1%40comcast.net> Sent: Tue, March 29, 2011 This assumes that there will be no damage and that clear margins will be the result even then, one has to wonder whether this is the right course. I disagree with the premise but I am glad Robin, you did say 'in my opinion'� and not that this was really the best way. This is the correct way to make statements that have such a far-reaching potential. When we speak surgery in cancer, we must also think 'seeding' of Cancer cells, something we cannot be sure will not happen. The very existence of this list came about because it was formed by its founder/s that did not believe the first course of action should be invasive procedures. This does not negate the possibility that surgery might be necessary but that is different from what was stated. Joe C. From: robyn howell Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 In my opinion if someone can have a tumor removed by surgery without a lot of damage and they have clear margins do that, then do alternative cancer methods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 hi Robyn, I feel the answer is yes, as someone can have a tumor removed by surgery yet the cancer cells are still hanging around the area of the surgery and at the time the immune system is so weakened fighting the tumor, the other cancer cells can increase. ________________________________ From: robyn howell Sent: Wed, 30 March, 2011 In my opinion if someone can have a tumor removed by surgery without a lot of damage and they have clear margins, do that, then do alternative cancer methods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.