Moss's anti-antiangiogenesis newsletter

[Guest guest]

In angiogenesis inhibition the tumor will grow to the maximum

possible size until it runs out of oxygen and nutrient

availability. The lack of oxygen, not the angiogenesis inhibitors,

is what triggers the virulence. This has long been known. The key

is to use other mechanisms of actions additionally (such as

microtubule disruptors and MMPIs) plus reversing immune anergy. This

must be done concurrently.

Ralph Moss writes a newsletter and as such he always has to have

something to extoll or trash. His readers want to read something

exciting or alarming. We are a culture of adrenaline junkies.

Moss believes the future is in the combination of conventional and

" complementary " methods. I think the future is in finding ways to

avoid any form of treatment that is toxic and imposed by controlling

authorities. I think the future is in utilizing all the amazing ways

the body has developed to heal itself.

Conventional medicine for advanced cancer is a death

sentence. Progress is measured on one hand in weeks or months of

added survival and on the other hand the acceptability of nightmarish

side effects. This is the standard. " Complementary " medicine is by

its wimpish nature deferential to this conventional approach. It

might soften the impact of the death warrant of conventional

medicine, but it will not cure. Most conventional strategies for

fighting cancer are too broken to be fixed.

The conventional approach is one of throwing alkylating hand grenades

into the DNA -- hopefully targeting some of the tumor. Once the

cancer is defined as terminal and the insurance is balking at paying

for " treatments " the patient is shifted to hospice for closure. What

could a person possibly want to do to " complement " such a forgone conclusion?

I don't want to trash Ralph Moss. He is a good writer, he sometimes

finds interesting information, and like a good scholar he documents

his work. It would be nice if he would torque the meaning of

" complementary " to that of reversing the harm of conventional cancer

therapy. I think that he likes the respect that he receives from

some conventional physicians -- he is no real threat to their

trillion-dollar business.

I would like to see a revolutionary awakening of consciousness to two

simple and incontrovertible facts:

-- There was virtually no mutagenic disease (read cancer) in any

culture until exposure to the western chemical-besotted lifestyle and

inundation with electromagnetic pollution. So our techno-shamans

treat cancer with chemicals mutagens and and mutagenic radiation

which only digs us into a deeper hole. Fight fire with fire?

-- The treatment/maintenance of chronic disease is the most

profitable business in the history of the planet. There is no

motivation to cure anything that brings in the big bucks. Quite the

opposite: the medical industry demands creation of new chronic

diseases by industrial pollution (e.g., fluoridation), by defining

normal human behavior as diseased (e.g., childhood inattentiveness),

by " treating " chronic disease with meds with toxic sequelae and by

criminalizing anything or anyone who rocks the conventional

money-money-money paradigm.

I know there are people on this list who will say, " Oh, , my

doctor is really nice and he/she is really trying to get me well. He

said my treatment is what he would do for his own family. " I'm not

going to argue with that as it could be 100% true. Half of my

pharmaceutical-biotech friends are in the business of indoctrinating

conventional physicians and manipulating media. If their families

get cancer then they go through my program.

Quibblers on the list might say that there is so much more to

conventional cancer treatment than the alkylating agents. Yes, this

is true but the miserable outcome is almost always the same. There

are a few rare exceptions such a Gleevec for CML or ablation therapy

for papillary thyroid cancer.

[Guest guest]

VGammill wrote:

>Half of my

pharmaceutical-biotech friends are in the business of indoctrinating

conventional physicians and manipulating media. If their families

get cancer then they go through my program.

>

What is your program please? I am currently on Abraxane x3 Avastine x1 weekly

And my cancer is spreading.

Sincerely,

Anita

[Guest guest]

wrote, among other informative things: " I think that he likes the

respect that he receives from some conventional physicians -- he is no real

threat to their trillion-dollar business. "

This attitude of Ralph Moss gives him the opportunity to speak before

conventional practitioners simply because, as says, " he is no real

threat " . However, I use some of his material to illustrate to some that things

are not as rosy as the establishment would have us believe. He gives me the

sources of his material which I might not be able to find. Other than that I

shut out his drive for a complimentary approach to Cancer.

This list was developed to be one that provides information on Alternative

practices and of late more people are relating ongoing conventional treatment

plans with some critical of anyone denigrating the Allopathic system. I for

one like to use their own(Conventional) statements to validate my criticisms of

their system.

Joe C.