Guest guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 Dr. J. Rowen,MD in his newsletter Second Opinion of December 2009, _www.secondopinionnewsletter.com_ (http://www.secondopinionnewsletter.com) has a very good article on the increased risk of more frequent mammogram screenings for Breast Cancer detection. The recent recommendation of an advisory committee to the Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services recommending that women under 50 have mammograms every other year rather than yearly as currently recommended by the American Cancer Society has generated a great deal of controversy in the shadow of the Health Care Reform Debate emphasizing " best medical practices " and the suspicion that " cost control " will be a hidden factor. In the Alternative Medical Community, these warnings had been around for many years, but were drowned out by the Cancer Establishment. The mammoth advertising campaign, duly initiated by the pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing industry was a great marketing tool for businesses that wanted to demonstrate their concern and support for overcoming frightening diseases. The real statistics are beginning to show that the concerns about a procedure that exposed women to regular doses of radiation that at best could only detect the presence of cancer, but do nothing to actually prevent it from growing in the first place was really raising the risk of breast cancer. The Archives if Internal Medicine of November 24, 2008 published a study showing the breast cancer risk to be 57% HIGHER among women age 50 to 64 who had 3 mammograms from 1996 to 2001 compared to women age 50 to 64 who had only 1 mammogram at the end of their observation period. The authors then found that the women who got regular mammograms had more invasive cancers detected. The medline abstract is below: The Natural History of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected by Mammography _http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu bmed/19029493?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDo\ cSum & ordinalpos=405_ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19029493?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.\ Pubmed_ResultsPa nel.Pubmed_RVDocSum & ordinalpos=405) This more distant objective view of the serious dilemma faced by many women can be much more safely addressed by having a thermography screening, which detects the metabolic changes in the body, based on the principle that a tumor gives off more heat than healthy tissue. It may be more expensive and may not be covered by insurance but it is worth getting if you feel you have to.See _www.breastthermography.com_ (http://www.breastthermography.com) for testing sites. Arnold Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.