Evidence: animal protein & cancer : The China Study

[Guest guest]

Well I can understand why for some cancer patients The China Study could be a

bible. For anyone with a serious interest in the genesis of cancer cell read

below :

Once upon a time in India, two unknown Doctors: Madhavan T. and Gopalan C.

published research in 1968 in an obscure Medical Journal that suggested a direct

relation between animal protein and cancer.

Madhavan T. and Gopalan C .The Effect of dietary protein on carcinogenesis of

aflatoxin.

------------------------------

Meanwhile in the Philippines:

Doctor , an American Researcher, is trying to find a solution for

malnourishment in poor populations by feeding them food with high protein

content: peanuts in this case. Unfortunately he encounters a problem with a

fungus called Aflatoxin.

What is Aflatoxin?

Aflatoxin is a fungus, a mold, a potent toxic, highly carcinogenic, mutagenic,

and immunosuppressive agent.

The crop of peanuts that Dr. was promoting and giving to the poor and

malnourished children of the Philippines, were contaminated by this carcinogenic

mold.

Peanuts are very rich in Protein but Aflatoxin was promoting Liver Cancer in the

poor, but not only to the poor…

The trouble with Aflatoxin:

During a conversation with President Marcos’s personal doctor, Dr.

discovers that even the wealthiest kids from Manila, Philippines had cancer of

the liver and at a greater rate than the poor. The wealthy kids had access to

numerous protein sources including meats and dairies. Could it be that there was

a link between animal protein and cancer, like in the Indian study?

This was the start of one of the greatest adventures in the modern history of

medicine.

Destiny (and irony) took T Colin , a man who dedicated all his energy in

the study and promotion of protein, especially animal protein, and led him to

become the greatest advocate against it.

-----------------------------------------------------------

The Mission:

Colin , with two separate research teams, spent the next 35 years

conducting research on the relation between animal protein and cancer.

First logical step: to corroborate the Indian Research

FIRST A DEFINITION:

FOCI: Pathology The regions of a localized bodily infection or disease. In this

case group of cancer cells.

=============================================================

FIRST EXPERIMENT

Method:

Take two groups of laboratory rats:

Feed the first group with 20% protein and feed the second group with 5% protein.

Give both groups enough Aflatoxin TO GET CANCER and then wait…

Results:

Every single rat fed with 20% protein had liver cancer or precursor lesions

Not a single rat in the second group had cancer or lesions.

See China Study : page 57 & 58

With 5% casein, cancer was stopped, and with 20% casein, it grew!!

Implications:

It is a 100% versus 0% success rate; we’ve discovered a very dangerous

chemical like Dioxin which can promote cancer, and the name of this product is

Animal Protein. Or maybe the experiment was faulty?

---------------------------------------------------------------

Second logical step, increase the level of Aflatoxin

Method:

Take two groups of laboratory rats:

One will be fed with a high Aflatoxin dose and a low protein Diet.

One with a low Aflatoxin dose and a high protein Diet.

Results:

The rats with the high-aflatoxin dose fed with a

Low 5% protein Diet.

LESS FOCI* OF CANCER

The rats with the low-aflatoxin dose feed with a

High 20% protein Diet.

MORE FOCI OF CANCER…

Implications:

A. The link is established between the quantity of protein consumed and

cancerous cell development.

B. Protein was more detrimental in increasing the number of cancer foci than a

dangerous carcinogen like Aflatoxin.

=============================================================

Third logical step: challenging the results and evidence acquired so far:

Method:

Take two groups of laboratory rats:

The group with the high-aflatoxin dose and a low protein Diet 5%

WILL NOW BE SWITCHED TO A HIGH PROTEIN DIET IN A SECOND PHASE

AND THEN BACK AGAIN TO A LOW PROTEIN DIET…

Results:

Foci INCREASE in size and number at the level of 20 % protein intake.

Foci DECREASE in size and number at the level of less than 10 % protein intake.

First implication:

The body could remember early carcinogen insults and they could be

“restarted†or,

if you prefer, “Jump started†just by increasing protein Intake.

Second amazing implication:FOCI GROWTH COULD BE REVERSED, INCREASED OR

DECREASED, BY SWITCHING THE AMOUNT OF PROTEIN BEING CONSUMED AT ALL STAGES OF

FOCI DEVELOPMENT

Third amazing implication:

This is the first time in History that we know what could be the biggest

cause for the cancer epidemic, Animal Protein.

Fourth amazing implication:

This is also the first time that we can take personal control against this

disease by preventing it or reversing it!

Nobody is powerless anymore in the fight against cancer.

==============================================================

The level of protein intake causing tumor growth in rats is at the same level

that humans consume in this country (1) or in most of the Western Countries.

(1)The China Study T. Colin PHD p 62 and 67

( 10 to 20 % of dietary Protein level )

Implication:

The results of these, and many others studies, showed Nutrition to be far more

important in controlling cancer promotion than the dose of the initiating

carcinogenâ€

The China Study T. Colin PHD p 66

====================================================