Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 were you in remission at the time you saw ? if not, were you verified in remission by onco after 's treatment of you? > > > > Marty, > Maybe you should find out some information about him before you rattle off > stuff. No you are not in a room with other people each place he goes to he > is there for either three or five days Each person on each day spends > between 10-16 hours with him depending on the need and there cancer and mets > He is no different except that he deals with just cancer, as DEAN KRAFT who > is a healer as well. ENERGY healers are for real. Why you ask am I sticking > up for him > > I know of his sessions because I went to see him privately in Cleveland , > OHIO and it was the ebst Money I ever spent. I could feel the tug of war > going on with my cancer. My energy level is great. Breathing great....I am > in remission...... > > He treats kids pro BONO, ones that have cancer.... > Marty, Please look up dean Kraft as well he is much more and he has treated > Oncologists and their families as well as has KURT. > > Personally I think Kurt is terrific..... He is impressionable, and easy to > talk to. With Kurt you can have a friend or family member there with you, > with Dean you cannot. > > Marty...know I didn't hold much stock in believing in healers......BUT now > its different I have experienced it and know its for real. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 He only takes medical proof. Secondary proof to that is how you feel and what you noticed . He follows you, ( his staff ) for five years to follow your remission after that as the Drs say there is usually NO need to worry. From: marytalamentes Date: 6/20/2009 8:12:51 PM were you in remission at the time you saw ? if not, were you verified in remission by onco after 's treatment of you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 One must be careful in their thinking about the concept of remission. What this means is that, for the moment, cancer is undetectable. Of course this is a good thing but it must not be considered to be a cure. Conventional therapy is only palliative meaning that the symptoms of a disease are addressed by treatments that do not get at the root cause of a condition but rather addresses the effects. I am suspect of specialized cancer treatment centers that claim to use both conventional and alternative treatments because each approach are in opposition to each other. Allopathy offers a destructive means of what is essentially chemical warfare. Its casualties include the immune system which, after chemo therapy, is severely weakened. While cancer cells are vulnerable to this method of treatment, ultimately the immune system often suffers permanent damage and when the cancer returns, as it almost always does, the immune system cannot support additional rounds of chemo nearly as well as it did the first time and thus the heroic efforts of allopathic medicine do not respond as well to additional treatment. The cure for cancer has been known for over 100 years now. Several doctors from that time period all utilized a medical approach to the condition by recognizing that what was believed to be some mysterious infection just didn't act like other infectious diseases. They focused upon the metabolic aspect and by the correction of nutritional deficiencies, the restoration of thyroid function, and the constant cleansing of the digestive tract, the disease called cancer disappeared from the body never to return. By making lifestyle changes, the body corrected itself. Take advantage of the lull in the storm. Recognize that you still have cancer and take the opportunity to strengthen your immune system and correct the conditions that led up to the disease and you will very likely not see its return. The cure is simple and anyone can do it. No doctor has ever cured cancer, only your own body can do that. Recognize that disease of any kind comes from within. It is the condition of the milieu that determines whether or not a germ will grow. To quote Claude Bernard (1813-1878) " The microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything. " Cancer is a disease of civilization. It is the body's response to toxins that fail to leave the normal elimination channels. Systemic toxicity reduces the absorption of minerals and oxygen and thus the vitality of the blood becomes impaired. Combined with often a local site of tissue damage whereby the flow of lymphatic fluid fails to keep up with tissue necrosis from some form of an injury or irritation, the body responds by constructing a tumor as an advanced form of protection. The tumor walls off the infection thus preventing its spread. Under ideal circumstances the internal environment within the tumor containment vessel sets up a state of anaerobisis whereby Progenitor cryptocides, a pleomorphic entity, devourers the dead and dying tissue leaving behind inert dirt so-to-speak, that is resorbed back into circulation and burned as fuel. It is only when the condition of the circulating fluids are so contaminated that the healing process of tumor construction and deconstruction becomes compromised and the disease of cancer manifests itself. In every case of cancer, a microbe is present. It is the presence or absence of this microbe that makes the difference between benign and malignant, but it is a grave mistake to believe that cancer is an infectious disease that we obtain through no fault of our own and that our body has been invaded by some alien microbe. This is not the case. Cancer is a response to poor living. The microbe associated with cancer arrives from the body humors as a scavenger. It developed from within via a mechanism that the Creator designed to return us to the soil from which we came. The morphology of this microbe is such that it is transformed from harmless stages to become an aggressive agent upon dead tissue, devouring it and leaving behind an inert ash. The poor condition of the blood and lymph is responsible for its formation and thus the true cure resides in cleaning up the trash that is constantly circulating in these body humors. The correction of cancer can only be obtained by changes in diet and lifestyle. If one is willing to make the necessary changes, cancer will go away. Because this doesn't fit the medical model and isn't quick and thus not potentially profitable, modern medicine ignores the cure. In the old medical books of my collection, those written by physicians who actually cured cancer offer litterally hundreds of examples of what modern medicine calls spontaneous cures. There was nothing spontaneous about them. The approach to the condition was as logical as the outcome and the cure was inevitable. > > My Oncologist at CTCA Cancer treatments centers of America verified it. > > > > > -- [ ] Re: Looks like a con to me/ KURT PETERSON > > > > > were you in remission at the time you saw ? > if not, were you verified in remission by onco after 's treatment of > you? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Why be so suspicious of treatments centers that use both. I spoke with my naturopath each time my treatment changed like I couldn't be on Curium till I was off of the camp regimen. Yes, I do know that right now its undetectable. Mr worked on areas where HE could detect the cancer and tests couldn't. From: comdyne2002 Date: 6/21/2009 11:45:46 AM One must be careful in their thinking about the concept of remission. What this means is that, for the moment, cancer is undetectable. Of course this is a good thing but it must not be considered to be a cure. Conventional therapy is only palliative meaning that the symptoms of a disease are addressed by treatments that do not get at the root cause of a condition but rather addresses the effects. I am suspect of specialized cancer treatment centers that claim to use both conventional and alternative treatments because each approach are in opposition to each other. Allopathy offers a destructive means of what is essentially chemical warfare. Its casualties include the immune system which after chemo therapy, is severely weakened.... The cure for cancer has been known for over 100 years now. Several doctors from that time period all utilized a medical approach to the condition by recognizing that what was believed to be some mysterious infection just didn t act like other infectious diseases. They focused upon the metabolic aspect and by the correction of nutritional deficiencies, the restoration of thyroid function, and the constant cleansing of the digestive tract, the disease called cancer disappeared from the body never to return. By making lifestyle changes, the body corrected itself..... In every case of cancer, a microbe is present....The correction of cancer can only be obtained by changes in diet and lifestyle. If one is willing to make the necessary changes, cancer will go away. Because this doesn't fit the medical model and isn't quick and thus not potentially profitable, modern medicine ignores the cure. " natalie " wrote: My Oncologist at CTCA Cancer treatments centers of America verified it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.