Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

IPT

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

In a message dated 9/4/07 1:03:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

nedialka60@... writes:

> And what is IPT

>

It is a form of low dose chemo based on sugar and insulin. Check it out on

Google...IPT,Cancer. It's very interesting. A friend is thinking about it for

her mother who had a terrible reaction to the traditional chemo for colon

cancer.

**************************************

Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL

at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

" Evidenced-based " medicine is a loosely used and variably defined

term promulgated by the controllers of the conventional medical

paradigm. It has about as much validity as " evidence-based "

religion. To answer questions such as the validity of a strategy it

is best to ask oneself a question or two that might require some reflection:

How do you weigh the integrity of a non-compliant practitioner vs the

integrity of the reigning medical paradigm.

How do you weigh the skills of such a practitioner vs the

" standard-of-care " medicine of those who march in lock step to the

drum of the authorities.

IPT uses 10-15% of the usual amounts of chemo. Is there any chance

that the pharmaceutical companies would risk such a fatal loss of

income? Would health insurance companies feel kindly about a therapy

that would require expensive monitoring for decades? No, I suspect

that they would sooner give the patient double the routine chemo

doses in hopes that they can quickly close the file, after all, it

would be better serving their primary responsibility -- the

stockholders and, ahem, themselves.

By prescreening IPT candidates for suitability one can routinely see

amazing results. Very few IPT docs are oncologists, and I have seen

a bit of elitism mixed in with the justifiable pride as these IPT

docs outperform the traditional oncologists. I have also seen

ignorant docs who know NOTHING about cancer get exceptional results

by adding IPT to their practice. That must be most annoying to

establishment oncologists.

I do think that IPT is used too often in cases where the patient has

drug resistance from high-dose therapy. I also think that it is

overutilized when the patient lives too far away or otherwise can't

afford the many weeks of treatment needed.

BTW, Ukrain (which I also like) is a chemo in that it contains

thiotepa which is one of the older chemotherapies.

At 10:09 AM 9/4/2008, you wrote:

>Phil,

>

>The subject is very controversial.

>

>IPT does not have of objective research.

>

><http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/ipt.html>http://www.q\

uackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/ipt.html

>

>http://www.givengain.com/cgi-bin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news_item & cause_id=1056\

& news_id=31882 & cat_id=0

>

>Use UKRAIN - no risks.

>

>Jan

>

>_____

>

>From: Zachary

>

>Jan,

>Good question. I was referring to the latter [iPT=Insulin Potentiation

>Therapy].

>

>No virus found in this incoming message.

>Checked by AVG.

>Version: 8.0.136 / Virus Database: 270.6.16/1651 - Release Date:

>9/4/2008 6:57 AM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you please clarify your statement of " It has about as much validity as

" evidence-based " religion " .

VGammill <vgammill@...> wrote:

" Evidenced-based " medicine is a loosely used and variably defined

term promulgated by the controllers of the conventional medical

paradigm. It has about as much validity as " evidence-based "

religion. To answer questions such as the validity of a strategy it

is best to ask oneself a question or two that might require some reflection:

How do you weigh the integrity of a non-compliant practitioner vs the integrity

of the reigning medical paradigm.

How do you weigh the skills of such a practitioner vs the

" standard-of-care " medicine of those who march in lock step to the

drum of the authorities..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

I am sorry,

to your statements I will join sentence:

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/ipt.html

" Besides the danger of insulin shock and death, using the wrong

chemotherapeutic agent(s) or doses that are too low can foster the

development of resistant cancer cell strains. Thus, IPT can prevent

appropriate chemotherapy from working later and make an otherwise curable

cancer incurable. "

Similar situation paint oncologists, in situation usage glutathione during

chemo( contradictory with arguments of distributors of Immunocal).

Jan

From: VGammill

I do think that IPT is used too often in cases where the patient has

drug resistance from high-dose therapy. I also think that it is

overutilized when the patient lives too far away or otherwise can't

afford the many weeks of treatment needed.

BTW, Ukrain (which I also like) is a chemo in that it contains

thiotepa which is one of the older chemotherapies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Al,

As children we readily believe that which we are taught by adults who

care for us. There is much comfort in this for the worried but

trustful child. There is a survival advantage too. But, as adults

struggling in a marginally comprehensible world we yearn for the

calming comfort of simple beliefs. As few childhood beliefs can be

supported by evidence many adults will ignore evidence and wrap

themselves in a cocoon of blind faith. Other adults choose to keep

their childhood faith, but their equally strong appreciation of the

value of evidence forces them into a never-ending search to make the

two congruent, hence, evidence-based religion.

This is foolishness. If religious acceptance were simply a matter of

following the laws of evidence and logic, then all religions would

have the means to reconcile all beliefs. This will never happen

because the true foundation of religion is one of culture and

values. It is a waste of time to fret over the existence of navels

on Adam and Eve, but true religion can assist many who seek moral

guidance in a world of conflicting values.

At 12:09 PM 9/4/2008, wrote:

>Would you please clarify your statement of " It has about as much

>validity as " evidence-based " religion " .

>

>VGammill <<mailto:vgammill%40adelphia.net>vgammill@...> wrote:

> " Evidenced-based " medicine is a loosely used and variably defined

>term promulgated by the controllers of the conventional medical

>paradigm. It has about as much validity as " evidence-based "

>religion. To answer questions such as the validity of a strategy it

>is best to ask oneself a question or two that might require some reflection:

>

>How do you weigh the integrity of a non-compliant practitioner vs

>the integrity of the reigning medical paradigm.

>How do you weigh the skills of such a practitioner vs the

> " standard-of-care " medicine of those who march in lock step to the

>drum of the authorities..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...