Re: Hopkins Update - Good article on Cancer

[Guest guest]

that's a good article - surely not from Hopkins :-)

 

according to Dr. Dy-Liacco: plant enzymes from veggies are good to digest plants

but not to digest animal proteins, for these you need human or porcine enzymes.

 

the enzymes are so crucial in the battle since they are needed to digest the

cancer cells outer coating (-negatively charged) to make them recognizable by

immune cells (also -negatively charged).

 

without an abundance of animal enzymes in the system cancer and immune cells

repell each other.

 

take a look at the adam and eve diet from Doctor Dy-Liacco here:

http://www..myhomespa.ph/articles/jdyliacco_adam & evediet.html

 

wishing you all best of health and God's blessings!

 

& Beatrice

[Guest guest]

As regards Hopkins so-called letter? Correct, it is a fake and let it remind us

that not everything we read is valid!

As regards Enzymes. I remember some time ago a concern about Enzyme possibly

being involved with Metastasis. I suppose the same thought that a 'outer

coating' gets digested allows seeding. ???

Like so many things stated, how does one validate such a thought or debunk it?

Does the approval or disapproval by one ore more make something valid? The

problem with most of us is that we are usually in a 'guessing' mode and rarely

have first-hand experience working with various types of cancers other than our

own....and they are different.

Joe C.

[Guest guest]

About enzymes causing metastasis -- it is highly debatable. I used them,

similar to the Protocol and got well. Others have done the same

thing. Because many have used them and received good results I don't think

we should even try to assume that they cause metastasis. In fact, I have

seen people use them and then get off of them and get worse. Was it because

of the enzymes? I don't know but it is just as valid of an assumption as

those that may think they cause metastasis.

I know my approval or disapproval doesn't mean much, but I can say that this

has not been what I see in clients or my personal experience.

Cancer is cancer. It is conventional medicine thinking that makes us try to

have a different protocol for different cancers. Granted some move faster

than others, but they are still cancer. Because we are all so different in

lifestyle, emotions, environmental toxin exposure, etc. these, in my

opinion, are the reasons that there are no " absolutes " in any type of cancer

therapy -- conventional or natural.

Be Well

Loretta

-----Original Message-----

As regards Hopkins so-called letter? Correct, it is a fake and let it

remind us that not everything we read is valid!

As regards Enzymes. I remember some time ago a concern about Enzyme

possibly being involved with Metastasis. I suppose the same thought that a

'outer coating' gets digested allows seeding. ???

Like so many things stated, how does one validate such a thought or debunk

it?

Does the approval or disapproval by one ore more make something valid? The

problem with most of us is that we are usually in a 'guessing' mode and

rarely have first-hand experience working with various types of cancers

other than our own....and they are different.

Joe C.