Re: My Article on Swayze and Hulda

[Guest guest]

Hi Suzanne,

Your article was tame. As you can see, people get very angry over anything that

challenges the status quo. Oddly enough, I've been having almost the same

argument in another group I belong to.

Your article, though, really didn't give any facts. And the reality is that not

everyone survives stage 4 cancer - even if they used only alternatives.

As to your situation, I am also stage 0. A lot has changed since you were

diagnosed. First, stage 0 is not precancer - it is actual carcinoma in situ.

Precancer indicates cell changes that are leading to cancer. With DCIS, you are

already there. It just hasn't become invasive yet.

Also, not all DCIS has the ability to become invasive. So, you would have to

look at what grade your DCIS was and if there was comedo necrosis.

Do you have the pathology report?

ar

>

> Hello,

>

> I just wrote an article on cancer, fairly tame I thought, but got some angry

comments:

>

>

> http://bit.ly/Hulda

>

> I bought 's first book years ago long after I decided not to have surgery

and radiation for Stage 0 (abnormal cells) breast carcinoma in situ, and it was

a big help. I suppose I was a health nut there for a while, but I didn't know

anybody else who was treating themselves for precancer. My doctors and family

gave me a really hard time. I did become chemically sensitive after mercury

removal, and am still dealing with that. But I'm alive and in otherwise good

health. I'm 59. My Stage 0 diagnosis was in 1994. I bought a Rife frequency

generator and learned that I had quite the yeast problem. I did the kidney and

liver cleanses several times, and numerous other alternatives. I eat a whole

foods diet, low in meat. I eat no milk products other than butter. I use no

OTC or prescription medications.

>

> Suzanne

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

It gives one a shock to read such savage words.

I heard people like this described as " nay-sayers " once. Seems fairly mild.

I wonder if these people have some sort of blood sugar problem to be so

furious over so little.

Some people just seem to be like this naturally.

What the problem of the others might be is anybody's guess.

You can only say what you believe, and the opposers can say anything.

That seems to be how it goes.

Their belittling language and over-reaction, their cutting and sarcastic

speech, only detracts from whatever might pass as their message.

If they have the truth, let them explain it, not try to squash your head

in the dirt.

It only takes a few words from these people for me to move my eyes on to

the next speech. And the next.

Or go and make a cup of herb tea.

R

Suzanne Olson wrote:

> Hello,

>

> I just wrote an article on cancer, fairly tame I thought, but got some angry

comments:

>

>

> http://bit.ly/Hulda

>

>

>