Re: Scared found large tumors on ovaries

[Guest guest]

Find a good alternative doc before you go the conventional route. There are

several around. Dr. in St. Pete, FL, Dr. Joe Brown in Tempe, AZ and Dr.

Bryzynski? in Houston. Let me know if I can do anything for you.

Carol

>

> Hello,

> New to group and totally scared about what happened to me.

> When to the gyn for bloating and some minor pain - once he felt my pelvis he

ordered an ultra sound that minute.

>

> He found one huge tumor on my left ovary, one smaller tumor on my right ovary.

Lot of fluid in the pelvis area. (Huge amounts of fluid)

>

> He said I needed to go to a cancer doctor ASAP and have everything taken out -

he said it did not look good at all. I can feel the large kinda soft mass on my

left ovary. It is around 6 inches an the right is around 3 inches. He said the

cancer doctor would have to explore the area while doing the surgery because it

looked extremely bad. Even the nurse the did the ultra sound wanted to cry for

me.

>

> He wants a CT scan, blood work and make an appointment with the cancer doctor

and have everyout out within 10 days.

>

> This growth started around Feb of this year. In Dec and Jan I had a flat

stomach.

> I have the ultra sound report if you want me to send it.

> Thank you so much

>

[Guest guest]

I second Carol's opinion. Find a good alternative doctor who has a good

reputation. When I was first diagnosed with breast cancer in both breasts, I

chose a " doctor " who guaranteed she'd " kill " the cancer without surgery, chemo

or rad. I trusted her for 14 months.  I finally had a Pet Scan, realized she was

lying when all lumps showed up active. Went to another Dr. with the same empty

promises and now I'm stage 4. good alternative Dr. like the ones she suggested

will tell you the truth. Sometimes it's prudent to have surgery, if the cancer

is confined to the tumor or just to debulk the cancer then hit it hard with

alternative treatments. I don't know about the kind of cancer that you have but

some are curable with chemo. I don't think ovarian is one of them. Keep us

posted on your decision ok? There are very knowledgeable people here who can

give you opinions about alternative therapies you may want to try.

Louise

> New to group and totally scared about what happened to me.

> When to the gyn for bloating and some minor pain - once he felt my pelvis he

ordered an ultra sound that minute.

> He found one huge tumor on my left ovary, one smaller tumor on my right ovary.

Lot of fluid in the pelvis area. (Huge amounts of fluid)

> He said I needed to go to a cancer doctor ASAP and have everything taken out -

he said it did not look good at all. I can feel the large kinda soft mass on my

left ovary. It is around 6 inches an the right is around 3 inches. He said the

cancer doctor would have to explore the area while doing the surgery because it

looked extremely bad. Even the nurse the did the ultra sound wanted to cry for

me.

> He wants a CT scan, blood work and make an appointment with the cancer doctor

and have everyout out within 10 days.

> This growth started around Feb of this year. In Dec and Jan I had a flat

stomach. I have the ultra sound report if you want me to send it. Thank you so

much

>

[Guest guest]

ine,

My husband is getting treatment in Tijuana, Mexico for brain cancer at The San

Diego Clinic (Dr. Munoz). I have met several women there who are getting treated

for ovarian cancer. If I were you, I would have everything removed, but refuse

chemo/radiation if that is what they are offering, and go alternative route with

therapy.

Best of luck to you,

Priscilla

I second Carol's opinion. Find a good alternative doctor who has a good

reputation. When I was first diagnosed with breast cancer in both breasts, I

chose a " doctor " who guaranteed she'd " kill " the cancer without surgery, chemo

or rad. I trusted her for 14 months.  I finally had a Pet Scan, realized she was

lying when all lumps showed up active. Went to another Dr. with the same empty

promises and now I'm stage 4. good alternative Dr. like the ones she suggested

will tell you the truth. Sometimes it's prudent to have surgery, if the cancer

is confined to the tumor or just to debulk the cancer then hit it hard with

alternative treatments. I don't know about the kind of cancer that you have but

some are curable with chemo. I don't think ovarian is one of them. Keep us

posted on your decision ok? There are very knowledgeable people here who can

give you opinions about alternative therapies you may want to try.

Louise

[Guest guest]

I just want to to add that even though there are a small number of cancers that

are " curable " with chemo - chemo is still CHEMO, highly destructive and toxic

and damaging to your immune system. So while you may " cure " the cancer, you are

still doing serious damage to your system and raising your odds of another

cancer showing up later. Also, raising your chance of the cancer returning

along with other serious medical conditions later. I know of many people who

have bragged to me about how they cured their lymphoma with chemo, because it is

supposedly one of the cancers where chemo " works " . But these same people had it

return 3, 4 times, had to do chemo each time, or they are on heart medication

for life because of severe valve damage, or they just have so many other medical

issues that I just look at them like they told me they were space. Like, is

this supposed to be a success story? You temporarily got rid of the cancer but

gave up your health and quality of life and possibly shortened it due to the

other issues.

So I wouldn't recommend chemo/radiation for ANY cancer, regardless of what

people tell you. My thinking is, if these certain cancers are so easily curable

with chemo, then their cure rates should be a lot higher and quicker with

alternate methods.

>

> I second Carol's opinion. Find a good alternative doctor who has a good

reputation. When I was first diagnosed with breast cancer in both breasts, I

chose a " doctor " who guaranteed she'd " kill " the cancer without surgery, chemo

or rad. I trusted her for 14 months.  I finally had a Pet Scan, realized she was

lying when all lumps showed up active. Went to another Dr. with the same empty

promises and now I'm stage 4. good alternative Dr. like the ones she suggested

will tell you the truth. Sometimes it's prudent to have surgery, if the cancer

is confined to the tumor or just to debulk the cancer then hit it hard with

alternative treatments. I don't know about the kind of cancer that you have but

some are curable with chemo. I don't think ovarian is one of them. Keep us

posted on your decision ok? There are very knowledgeable people here who can

give you opinions about alternative therapies you may want to try.

> Louise

>

[Guest guest]

Please weigh these chemo comments. There are chemo's with minimal if any side

effects. Not all chemo is dangerous. Many childhood cancers are curable with

chemo. As had pointed out in previous posts, we have to take each

therapy and look at the science behind it. I would not take most chemos but if

it was curative, I'd look at the studies and the short and long term effects of

it before I ruled it out. Taking an all or nothing approach with any cancer

treatment is not conducive to healing. I've learned this from experience.

Louise

From: " detwa_3017 "

I just want to to add that even though there are a small number of cancers that

are " curable " with chemo - chemo is still CHEMO, highly destructive and toxic

and damaging to your immune system. So while you may " cure " the cancer, you are

still doing serious damage to your system and raising your odds of another

cancer showing up later. Also, raising your chance of the cancer returning

along with other serious medical conditions later. I know of many people who

have bragged to me about how they cured their lymphoma with chemo, because it is

supposedly one of the cancers where chemo " works " . But these same people had it

return 3, 4 times, had to do chemo each time, or they are on heart medication

for life because of severe valve damage, or they just have so many other medical

issues that I just look at them like they told me they were space. Like, is

this supposed to be a success story? You temporarily got rid of the cancer but

gave up your health and quality of life and possibly shortened it due to the

other issues.

So I wouldn't recommend chemo/radiation for ANY cancer, regardless of what

people tell you. My thinking is, if these certain cancers are so easily curable

with chemo, then their cure rates should be a lot higher and quicker with

alternate methods.

[Guest guest]

I said that these are MY thoughts on chemo, and that I would not recommend it to

anyone for any reason. I've studied both conventional and natural treatments

extensively since I was diagnosed and I am firmly grounded in my opinion on

chemo and radiation. If someone wants to go that route, that is THEIR choice,

obviously, its readily available. But as far as I'm concerned, I have nothing

good to say about it. It's not an all or nothing approach for me, its either

toxic, or non-toxic. Again, its my opinion and bears no weight on what others

choose to do. Just like we voice our opinions on other treatments, vitamins,

protocols, we can voice our opinion on chemo.

>

> Please weigh these chemo comments. There are chemo's with minimal if any side

effects. Not all chemo is dangerous. Many childhood cancers are curable with

chemo. As had pointed out in previous posts, we have to take each

therapy and look at the science behind it. I would not take most chemos but if

it was curative, I'd look at the studies and the short and long term effects of

it before I ruled it out. Taking an all or nothing approach with any cancer

treatment is not conducive to healing. I've learned this from experience.

>

> Louise

>

>

[Guest guest]

I do not disagree with you about chemo. It does poison your body, however there

is a way to administer it so that it only goes into the cancerous cells and does

not affect your healthy cells. There is a method called Insulin Potentiation

Therapy or IPT for short, whereby they only administer 10% of the standard chemo

dose but it goes only to the cancer cells. I am sure if you google IPT or the

full name you will get all kinds of explanations. My husband is getting it at

Linchitz Medical Wellness, www.linchitzwellness.com the whole process is

described on their web site. This is not instead of natural therapies, it is in

addition to natural therapies. My husband still takes his curcumin, 5-loxin,

resveratrol, grapeseed extract, graviola, cimetidine, AHCC, coroliolus PSP, ABM,

CoQ10, Cod Liver Oil, pancreas enzymes, EGCG, and some other things.

My husband is just starting but the patients we meet there attest to the fact

that you do not get sick, you do not lose your hair, do not get nauseated. You

feel perfectly fine. There are not many practitioners who are trained in this

method, but if you decide you like what you read you may want to see if you can

find a practitioner in your area that is trained in this method of administering

chemo.

Good Luck

Nili

[Guest guest]

cancertutor.com Praying for you and Gods blessing and healing!

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:15 PM, detwa_3017 <epurdles@...> wrote:

>

>

> I said that these are MY thoughts on chemo, and that I would not recommend

> it to anyone for any reason. I've studied both conventional and natural

> treatments extensively since I was diagnosed and I am firmly grounded in my

> opinion on chemo and radiation. If someone wants to go that route, that is

> THEIR choice, obviously, its readily available. But as far as I'm concerned,

> I have nothing good to say about it. It's not an all or nothing approach for

> me, its either toxic, or non-toxic. Again, its my opinion and bears no

> weight on what others choose to do. Just like we voice our opinions on other

> treatments, vitamins, protocols, we can voice our opinion on chemo.

>

>

>

> >

> > Please weigh these chemo comments. There are chemo's with minimal if any

> side effects. Not all chemo is dangerous. Many childhood cancers are curable

> with chemo. As had pointed out in previous posts, we have to take

> each therapy and look at the science behind it. I would not take most chemos

> but if it was curative, I'd look at the studies and the short and long term

> effects of it before I ruled it out. Taking an all or nothing approach with

> any cancer treatment is not conducive to healing. I've learned this from

> experience.

> >

> > Louise

> >

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Take a look at IPT. Many alternative docs use this treatment. Insulin

Potentiation Treatment.

[Guest guest]

Sigh --- I was going to stay out of this because it's a little too close to

home, but I can't.  I had the same sort of scenario you have.  Same symptoms,

etc.  The doctors did surgery to remove the ovaries and do a complete

hysterectomy.  They said I would not likely live more than 3 months, and that

was even with chemotherapy.  That was 2 years and 11 months ago.

 

Where I live, my options were very limited.  I didn't have the funds to go to

the US for treatment, and only traditional chemotherapy was available to me.  I

utilized it to buy time to find something better.  While taking chemo I also

took many nutritional supplements to support general health, and followed the

Budwig diet.  The chemo wasn't fun by any means, but it did its job for the

short haul.

 

In the meantime I found other alternative methods of addressing the problem. 

You no doubt will learn that ovarian cancer is something that really never goes

away, even if it has gone away!  So while doing the chemo I added alternatives

as I found them.  These were cesium (from Advanced Scientific Health --- no

doctor involved in monitoring it because none was available);  LDN (because I

finally found a doctor who was willing to prescribe it for me);  Oleander from

Utopia Silver when I discovered it; and FINALLY a doctor who does Vitamin C

IVs.  He also has me take a product called C-Statin, and Concentrated Flax

Lignans.  He has now agreed to order Vitamin B-17 for me and we are going to

follow a protocol I found on the internet that is a blending of IV Vitamin C, IV

and oral B-17, and several other oral meds.  I also continue to take

nutritional supplements for general well-beng.

 

Through this process my CA-125 (tumor marker) has dropped to normal.  I am not

going to have more scans, but just go on ultrasounds, blood work, and how I am

feeling ---- which is perfectly healthy.  But I shall continue to do all of the

above though less intensely over time.  I cut back on the Cesium because it is

toxic if you get too much, and will only take maybe 30 grams a year from now

on.  My main things, for the rest of my life, will be the Flax Lignans, Vitamin

C, Oleander, LDN, nutritional supplements, and Budwig-based diet.

 

My message here, I guess, is do whatever you have to do to stay alive while you

find what is right for you.  My alternative doctor (who I found after a 2-year

long search) believes in hitting it with everything you've got, and sort out

what worked or didn't work later on.  It worked for me.

 

Good luck!

Jan

 

 

 

-

[Guest guest]

I am curious because I have been looking into cucurmin for my mom. She is almost

gone and I realize it may be too late but is ready to try alternatives. I was

looking into cucurmin but she is still doing erbatux. She has quit radiation. I

am getting contradictory results for cucurmin most say it nullifies the effect

of chemo. Any help figuring this mess out would be greatly appreciated. I wish

she would stop the chemo at this point. Everything the drs have done has been

detrimental (duh?)

Cheri

>

> I do not disagree with you about chemo. It does poison your body, however

there is a way to administer it so that it only goes into the cancerous cells

and does not affect your healthy cells. There is a method called Insulin

Potentiation Therapy or IPT for short, whereby they only administer 10% of the

standard chemo dose but it goes only to the cancer cells. I am sure if you

google IPT or the full name you will get all kinds of explanations. My husband

is getting it at

> Linchitz Medical Wellness, www.linchitzwellness.com the whole process is

described on their web site. This is not instead of natural therapies, it is in

addition to natural therapies. My husband still takes his curcumin, 5-loxin,

resveratrol, grapeseed extract, graviola, cimetidine, AHCC, coroliolus PSP, ABM,

CoQ10, Cod Liver Oil, pancreas enzymes, EGCG, and some other things.

> My husband is just starting but the patients we meet there attest to the fact

that you do not get sick, you do not lose your hair, do not get nauseated. You

feel perfectly fine. There are not many practitioners who are trained in this

method, but if you decide you like what you read you may want to see if you can

find a practitioner in your area that is trained in this method of administering

chemo.

> Good Luck

> Nili

>

[Guest guest]

The establishment will have you believe that taking supplements of any kind will

be detrimental to the chemo. This is not true. The supplements strengthen your

own body's immune system so that your own body can

#1 fight the cancer and #2 be stronger to withstand the harmful and poisonous

effects of the chemo on your healthy cells. Any Physician who practices

Complimentary and Alternative Medicine will encourage you to take supplements

while undergoing chemo. However, Curcumin by itself is not enough, it is only

one thing in the arsenal of natural immune enhancers that you need in your

arsenal. If your mom is going to start taking supplements, I would encourage

you to go to www.cancertutor.com for starters to start learning about the

different things. From there continue researching on other sites. Another good

one is www.lef.org

Good Luck

[ ] Re: Scared found large tumors on ovaries

I am curious because I have been looking into cucurmin for my mom. She is

almost gone and I realize it may be too late but is ready to try alternatives. I

was looking into cucurmin but she is still doing erbatux. She has quit

radiation. I am getting contradictory results for cucurmin most say it nullifies

the effect of chemo. Any help figuring this mess out would be greatly

appreciated. I wish she would stop the chemo at this point. Everything the drs

have done has been detrimental (duh?)

Cheri

>

> I do not disagree with you about chemo. It does poison your body, however

there is a way to administer it so that it only goes into the cancerous cells

and does not affect your healthy cells. There is a method called Insulin

Potentiation Therapy or IPT for short, whereby they only administer 10% of the

standard chemo dose but it goes only to the cancer cells. I am sure if you

google IPT or the full name you will get all kinds of explanations. My husband

is getting it at

> Linchitz Medical Wellness, www.linchitzwellness.com the whole process is

described on their web site. This is not instead of natural therapies, it is in

addition to natural therapies. My husband still takes his curcumin, 5-loxin,

resveratrol, grapeseed extract, graviola, cimetidine, AHCC, coroliolus PSP, ABM,

CoQ10, Cod Liver Oil, pancreas enzymes, EGCG, and some other things.

> My husband is just starting but the patients we meet there attest to the

fact that you do not get sick, you do not lose your hair, do not get nauseated.

You feel perfectly fine. There are not many practitioners who are trained in

this method, but if you decide you like what you read you may want to see if you

can find a practitioner in your area that is trained in this method of

administering chemo.

> Good Luck

> Nili

>

[Guest guest]

I agree.  I had stage 4 Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2001 and was told it was very

curable and as a result had chemo and radiation.  I was officially pronounced

in remission in early 2002.  in August 2007 it was back with a vengence and I

am once again at stage 4.  I would never do it again if I had the chance to go

back.

 

Debbie 

I just want to to add that even though there are a small number of cancers that

are " curable " with chemo - chemo is still CHEMO, highly destructive and toxic

and damaging to your immune system. So while you may " cure " the cancer, you are

still doing serious damage to your system and raising your odds of another

cancer showing up later. Also, raising your chance of the cancer returning along

with other serious medical conditions later.

[Guest guest]

You might also look into MMS boards. It is new but I have read on the online

boards of successes with it. Just tonight someone wrote in that their dogs

tumors are half the size they were a month ago. I used it for Lyme with

success, but if I had cancer I would try it for that too. Just know there

are many ways to control/attack it.

O

[Guest guest]

<<My thinking is, if these certain cancers are so easily curable

with chemo, then their cure rates should be a lot higher and quicker with

alternate methods>>

Not true, because chemo works quite differently from alt. treatments.

Of the (very few) types of cancer that have high full (and permanent) recovery

rates from conventional chemo, some (e.g., testicular) are easily healed by alt.

treatments, but others (e.g., Hodgkins, acute lymphocytic leukemia [ALL])

are very difficult (though far from impossible) to achieve full recoveries thru

alt. treatment.

Nili Gitig " <ngitig@...>

<<The establishment will have you believe that taking supplements of any kind

will

be detrimental to the chemo. This is not true. The supplements strengthen your

own body's immune system so that your own body can

#1 fight the cancer and #2 be stronger to withstand the harmful and poisonous

effects of the chemo on your healthy cells....However, Curcumin by itself is not

enough, it is only one thing in the arsenal>>

For the most part, I strongly agree.

>Alternative doctors...do you know any around the Virginia area?

I know tons. Please email me privately and let me know in which telephone area

codes you'd like names.

ina, let me know if you'd like info on alt. or integrative treatments for

ovarian cancer.

Deborah <debannlin@...> wrote:

<<I had stage 4 Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2001 and was told it was very

curable and as a result had chemo and radiation. I was officially pronounced

in remission in early 2002. in August 2007 it was back>>

Sorry to hear about your experience.

Let me know if you'd like info on alt. treatments for Hodgkins.

Leonard

[Guest guest]

............leonardleonard1 stated: testicular cancers are easily healed by

alternative treatments: Please elaborate on this leonardleoanard1. Thanks in

advance for the info. Much appreciated.

-

[Guest guest]

Priscilla,

Can you please tell me more about your husband's treatment? I don't know what

to do. I am so depressed.

Can chemo help? Please advise.

>

> I second Carol's opinion. Find a good alternative doctor who has a good

reputation. When I was first diagnosed with breast cancer in both breasts, I

chose a " doctor " who guaranteed she'd " kill " the cancer without surgery, chemo

or rad. I trusted her for 14 months.  I finally had a Pet Scan, realized she was

lying when all lumps showed up active. Went to another Dr. with the same empty

promises and now I'm stage 4. good alternative Dr. like the ones she suggested

will tell you the truth. Sometimes it's prudent to have surgery, if the cancer

is confined to the tumor or just to debulk the cancer then hit it hard with

alternative treatments. I don't know about the kind of cancer that you have but

some are curable with chemo. I don't think ovarian is one of them. Keep us

posted on your decision ok? There are very knowledgeable people here who can

give you opinions about alternative therapies you may want to try.

> Louise

>

[Guest guest]

Carol,

I am getting ready to try one of these doctor's who do you think would be the

best?

Thank you

From: cjmorgan112 <cjmorgan112@...>

Subject: [ ] Re: Scared found large tumors on ovaries

Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 3:01 PM

 

Find a good alternative doc before you go the conventional route. There are

several around. Dr. in St. Pete, FL, Dr. Joe Brown in Tempe, AZ and Dr.

Bryzynski? in Houston. Let me know if I can do anything for you.

Carol

>

> Hello,

> New to group and totally scared about what happened to me.

> When to the gyn for bloating and some minor pain - once he felt my pelvis he

ordered an ultra sound that minute.

>

> He found one huge tumor on my left ovary, one smaller tumor on my right ovary.

Lot of fluid in the pelvis area. (Huge amounts of fluid)

>

> He said I needed to go to a cancer doctor ASAP and have everything taken out -

he said it did not look good at all. I can feel the large kinda soft mass on my

left ovary. It is around 6 inches an the right is around 3 inches. He said the

cancer doctor would have to explore the area while doing the surgery because it

looked extremely bad. Even the nurse the did the ultra sound wanted to cry for

me.

>

> He wants a CT scan, blood work and make an appointment with the cancer doctor

and have everyout out within 10 days.

>

> This growth started around Feb of this year. In Dec and Jan I had a flat

stomach.

> I have the ultra sound report if you want me to send it.

> Thank you so much

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Detwa:

as a person who suffered both breast cancerr and NHl, I would have to say that

chemo has a good chance with bc stage one. That is it.

For nhl, every one should know it is temporary. And oncologists do not lie about

it.

I chose to do surgery for bc and then intensive alternative. At least the tumor

was out.

For nhl, I did nothing for ten years until it became aggressive. I choose chemo

but I know it will come back . However, I am taking big alternative guns to max

my survival. I am working with a coach doctor on this. cannot do it alone

XO e

> >

> > I second Carol's opinion. Find a good alternative doctor who has a good

reputation. When I was first diagnosed with breast cancer in both breasts, I

chose a " doctor " who guaranteed she'd " kill " the cancer without surgery, chemo

or rad. I trusted her for 14 months.  I finally had a Pet Scan, realized she was

lying when all lumps showed up active. Went to another Dr. with the same empty

promises and now I'm stage 4. good alternative Dr. like the ones she suggested

will tell you the truth. Sometimes it's prudent to have surgery, if the cancer

is confined to the tumor or just to debulk the cancer then hit it hard with

alternative treatments. I don't know about the kind of cancer that you have but

some are curable with chemo. I don't think ovarian is one of them. Keep us

posted on your decision ok? There are very knowledgeable people here who can

give you opinions about alternative therapies you may want to try.

> > Louise

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Hi ina Lee,

I do have my favorites to tell you about, but I would love to chat with you

about your location and what would seem best for you.

Please feel free to contact me personally to discuss what might work best for

your location. That way I can help you best.

In health,

Carol

>

> Carol,

> I am getting ready to try one of these doctor's who do you think would be the

best?

> Thank you

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi a - If you are inclined to try something non-conventional but

promising, there is a brand-new non-toxic, scientific treatment approach

that is being tested now in a pilot clinical trial at a major cancer

center in the US.

This uses a very high dose of a natural lipid agent - several published

biological studies, including tests with patients and also advanced

assays using fresh human cancer tissue, indicate that once this high

level of agent is reached, it will totally kill tumor anywhere in the

body. It's something anyone can do by themselves for a cost of about

$20 using high but tolerable doses of a dietary agent, via a biological

trick to get very high levels of this agent in the blood in active form

over a period of hours.

This is based on a niche field of science, is being tested in a clinical

trial, and follows the scientific method: no claims are made whatsoever

that this is guaranteed to work, or that these unusually high levels of

this otherwise non-toxic agent may not conceivably have adverse effects.

If you tried this, after a month, it would either be successful, in

which case tumor would be significantly shrunk, and it would be likely

that another treatment or two could completely eliminate the tumor.

Or, alternatively, it could completely fail, in which case nothing may

change, and you could pursue other options, including potentially

surgery with a combination then of best standard and complementary

therapies. (Or, in worst case scenario, very high levels of this

harmful agent could have unforeseen and potentially serious adverse

effects.)

The first patient (stage III ovarian cancer) who tried a lower-dose form

of this regimen in 2006 had her CA-125 tumor marker drop in half

afterwards. The second patient who tried this recently was told by

hospice to prepare for death within weeks last December, and is still

out and about today. This is a hopeful indication that the protocol was

doable and didn't have adverse effects for her, and the situation is

encouraging, yet scans actually showed slight growth of the tumor, and

the next application of the regimen would use a higher dosage and a

natural adjunct agent (a calcium ionophore), which the first patient

used, to boost efficacy. Also, this second patient had a metastatic

melanoma near the lung, whereas any tumor in the peritoneal cavity (a

tumor on the ovaries) would be more likely to respond to an orally

administered agent.

For details, see www.ufachallenge.org <http://www.ufachallenge.org> -

user name is " membrane " , password is " effect " , or contact me. -

>

> Hello,

> New to group and totally scared about what happened to me.

> When to the gyn for bloating and some minor pain - once he felt my

pelvis he ordered an ultra sound that minute.

>

> He found one huge tumor on my left ovary, one smaller tumor on my

right ovary. Lot of fluid in the pelvis area. (Huge amounts of fluid)

>

> He said I needed to go to a cancer doctor ASAP and have everything

taken out - he said it did not look good at all. I can feel the large

kinda soft mass on my left ovary. It is around 6 inches an the right is

around 3 inches. He said the cancer doctor would have to explore the

area while doing the surgery because it looked extremely bad. Even the

nurse the did the ultra sound wanted to cry for me.

>

> He wants a CT scan, blood work and make an appointment with the cancer

doctor and have everyout out within 10 days.

>

> This growth started around Feb of this year. In Dec and Jan I had a

flat stomach.

> I have the ultra sound report if you want me to send it.

> Thank you so much

>

[Guest guest]

Hello,

I had the tumor removed and it was coming from the uterus and not the ovaries.

Although, the scan and ultra sound was showing the ovary it was actually coming

from the uterus.

> >

> > Hello,

> > New to group and totally scared about what happened to me.

> > When to the gyn for bloating and some minor pain - once he felt my

> pelvis he ordered an ultra sound that minute.

> >

> > He found one huge tumor on my left ovary, one smaller tumor on my

> right ovary. Lot of fluid in the pelvis area. (Huge amounts of fluid)

> >

> > He said I needed to go to a cancer doctor ASAP and have everything

> taken out - he said it did not look good at all. I can feel the large

> kinda soft mass on my left ovary. It is around 6 inches an the right is

> around 3 inches. He said the cancer doctor would have to explore the

> area while doing the surgery because it looked extremely bad. Even the

> nurse the did the ultra sound wanted to cry for me.

> >

> > He wants a CT scan, blood work and make an appointment with the cancer

> doctor and have everyout out within 10 days.

> >

> > This growth started around Feb of this year. In Dec and Jan I had a

> flat stomach.

> > I have the ultra sound report if you want me to send it.

> > Thank you so much

> >

>

>

>

>

>