Guest guest Posted March 20, 2010 Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 Hi Mike, So, did you or did you not become a subject of this method? It looks like you did not. That might explain why your naturopath would not rub it. Another thing which had occurred to me is, that the method has to be taught by a practician, rather than a theoretician. It has also occurred to me, that it may be transferable only from people with a special capacity to strictly 1 more " generation " of people without such capacity. I am certainly buying the book :-) In the worst case, I will blow a few bucks, but something is telling me I better have a better look. I am seldom wrong on such intuitions, if ever. With kind regards, Slavek. mmurra777 wrote: > > > > Hey Slavek, > > Love this one. Every time I've seen it I'm taken back, in memory, to > happy Sunday bible belt hour. Oral , your spirit lives. > > This is a variant of the 'laying on of hands' healing paradigm. > > Back in the day, 30CE, its mastering was required of all Messiah wanna > bes. Sorry, can't recall off hand if 'water to wine' was an earlier or > more advanced course. > > On a more current note. > A physio-therapist I used twice about three years ago contacted me a > few months after my last session. She was taking an 'accredited' > course on the very technique referred to in the 'paper' and wanted to > know if I would be willing (she was aware of my cancers) to be a > subject/patient? for her after she completed the training. The price > was right, free. I said go for it. > > Ran into her about a year later, brief chat, no mention of the > 'healing'. > > Maybe she wasn't skeptical enough. > > MikeM > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2010 Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 Hi Mike, Thank you for this information. There is one thing in that article I posted, which is not always applicable. That is the notion that healers are not usually able to help themselves. Well, I did exactly that some 20 years ago [and no, I would not consider myself such a healer, at least I have never tried except for this one autocase] I begun suffering from what was finally " diagnosed " as cluster headache and it was debilitating, 5-6 times a week. Four months of doctors and pills. Stepping up the pills was also stepping up their cost and it came to some $280 a months, I had enough. I have decided that it is in my head, that my head knew perfectly well what is wrong and that my head better sort it out. Every night, while going to sleep, I would appeal to my brain to sort it out, explaining to it, that it was in its best interest to do so, till I fell asleep. It did not go away all at once, but the improvement has. It took about half a year. till the headache recurrences stopped almost all together. Within a year it was gone totally. I would get mild ones ever since, but may be once a year, if that. Use as you may. With kind regards, Slavek. mmurra777 wrote: > > > > Hi Slavek, > > Regrettably, I did not become a subject. She never followed through on > her request, and I have felt it inappropriate to ask. I was very much > looking forward to the experience. > > Was reviewing my past communications. She had sent me a pdf of one of > the original papers (has the mouse pictures) by Bengston, and the > notes from a seminar given by Bengston that she attended. > 'Anomalous Healing Research > 'Notes from a Seminar with F. Bengston, Ph.D. in Toronto, > 'June 7, 8, 2008 > > Her notes mention one Oskar Estabany. > > The article source that started this is worth repeating; > http://www.scientificexploration.org/edgescience/edgescience_02.pdf > Well worth reading in terms of seeing outside the box. > > Years ago one of our national TV broadcasters produced a great > documentary on a visualization healing of one of our Rock legends, > Ronny Hawkins, the Hawk. He's still going strong. > > I believe in the power of the mind. What I do not tolerate is > fraudsters and those 'too busy' to seek the source. > > If you are not already acquainted with him, you may find the follow > site interesting; > http://www.sheldrake.org/homepage.html > > Enjoy the book, and do report back on it. > > MikeM > > P.S. This is a re-work of an earlier post. It and one or two others > have yet to appear. The blog monster must have got them before they > even made it to list, or I, in my brain fog, may have forgot to press > the send button. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Deborah wrote: > Ok, so a human might imagine a picture in the future (with grandkids, maybe), what do you visualize for mice? > It reminds me of the book 'The Secret' where you visualize yourself living the life you want. Or am I getting the wrong idea? V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Imagine the 'potential' power of a human's hands on a little mouse body? Anyway, this is an interesting subject and like all, good to explore with an open mind but not so open 'Our brains fall out'. The question, " what do you visualize for mice " is an interesting thought and I propose a wedge of Provolone Cheese maybe? Monterey Jack? A dead cat? Joe C. From: Deborah H Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:52 AM Subject: [ ] Re: mind healing technique I'd like more information on the exact technique. From what I saw in the article, he lists 20 outcomes and each outcomes has a visual connected to it, then, the " healer " plays these series of visuals on a loop for a certain amount of time " seeing them " . What should the outcome be for humans? Could someone suggest ideas. I think he was purposefully stingy about that part of the experiment and it seemed like the most important part. Ok, so a human might imagine a picture in the future (with grandkids, maybe), what do you visualize for mice? Deborah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Deborah, I was also somewhat confused about that but I've read quite a bit about quantum healing which is much like what Brengston is doing so believe you " see " this filmstrip loop of the possible outcomes you would like have to happen without putting too much emphasis or importance on the outcome " see it and let it go, what will be will be. " I would imagine the filmstrip loop for the mice would be something like...sleek healthy looking fur, good appetite, no tumors, clear eyes, being able to run a maze in record time [lol] etc etc. I believe the outcome would be the same for humans as it was for the mice...healthy with no tumors and none in the future. Regards, Sandy I'd like more information on the exact technique. From what I saw in the article, he lists 20 outcomes and each outcomes has a visual connected to it, then, the " healer " plays these series of visuals on a loop for a certain amount of time " seeing them " . What should the outcome be for humans? Could someone suggest ideas. I think he was purposefully stingy about that part of the experiment and it seemed like the most important part. Ok, so a human might imagine a picture in the future (with grandkids, maybe), what do you visualize for mice? Deborah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 Hi Deborah, May be read it again. The images were designed specifically for the " healer " based on his/her life time desires. The point was not to really heal the mice. The point was to get the " healer " in a state of mind which allowed the healing of the mice. Pretty much a transference of the positive desire attitude. The notion that the technique would not treat warts strongly indicates that the author did, or at least conducted human trials with all kinds of ailments. The technique would be the same. If you want to know more, get the book asap, it may never be republished and it may also disappear soon after the first publishing. With kind regards, Slavek. Deborah H wrote: > > > > I'd like more information on the exact technique. From what I saw in > the article, he lists 20 outcomes and each outcomes has a visual > connected to it, then, the " healer " plays these series of visuals on a > loop for a certain amount of time " seeing them " . What should the > outcome be for humans? Could someone suggest ideas. I think he was > purposefully stingy about that part of the experiment and it seemed > like the most important part. Ok, so a human might imagine a picture > in the future (with grandkids, maybe), what do you visualize for mice? > > Deborah > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Deborah, Please post the article on Cancercured. It is certainly of general interest. BTW, you should never feel a need to justify that which you think is a sensible avenue for exploration. The world needs more bold explorers. Besides, there's no downside. You're not going to fall off the side of a cliff or get lost at sea. At 10:25 AM 3/23/2010, Deborah wrote: > >Also, I wrote to Dr. Bergstrom (I think that was his name) and he >sent me a pdf file of an article where he explains the process more >clearly. I wonder if I can post that? Let me look again and see >whether it was from a published article or not. I could certainly >explain it in my own words...no time today though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 I wouldn't mind seeing that pdf -- could you email it to me? Thanks, V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Please post the information/article for all to review. I purchased one off the website (site unseen)...but again it did not have the specifics...I was very disappointed! Thanks, On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Deborah H wrote: > MikeM, > > I'd be willing to try it for you...to act as your " healer " . I think that means I need some prompts from you to visualize and maybe a time when we both could feel the energy. C'mon, folks. Don't make fun of me. I'm just giving this a good ole open-minded try. If this is too zany for the members, write me offline. > > Also, I wrote to Dr. Bergstrom (I think that was his name) and he sent me a pdf file of an article where he explains the process more clearly. I wonder if I can post that? Let me look again and see whether it was from a published article or not. I could certainly explain it in my own words...no time today though. > > Best, > Deborah > > > > > > We've had a nice little gab on this. > > > > I don't recall anyone yet mentioning that they have been the 'healer', or the subject, in a mind healing session. > > > > Has anyone been, or am I as close (a year later, and still waiting for the call) as anyone has come? If so, what benefits have go of it? > > > > An acquaintance told about Reiki healing; part of which, as I was told, involved human energy transfer to a subject and other entities such as homeopathics. Correct me if I got that wrong. Same question here as above. > > > > MikeM > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 As I read over the technique described to perform the miracle healing I become increasingly puzzled. 1. What is meant by " intention " ? Usually when you think of intention there would be associated steps or activities to accomplish the goal. The way intention is used here I think they are only speaking about wishful thinking. The author also discourages thinking about the steps to accomplish the goal -- just visualize the outcome no matter how unlikely. 2. I cannot imagine finding any skeptic willing to invest an hour a day for weeks on end. The skeptic-healer would be required to visualize a minimum of 12 images per second for an hour. That is 43,200 mental images per hour. I think this is quite impossible; how would you ever tally these images? 3. The " strict ethical rule " in Step 1 seems quite absurd. By these standards if I want to imagine President Obama signing a healthcare bill for a single payer system I must first get his permission to imagine this ?! I don't think I'll spend much time investigating this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 .. can you expand on your experience with energy healing? Thanks... Lola On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:58 PM, melizzard11 <melizzard@...> wrote: > > > Would this be the same as energy healing? Because, if it is, I have had my > life saved with a healing session. > > xoo > > > > > > > We've had a nice little gab on this. > > > > I don't recall anyone yet mentioning that they have been the 'healer', or > the subject, in a mind healing session. > > > > Has anyone been, or am I as close (a year later, and still waiting for > the call) as anyone has come? If so, what benefits have go of it? > > > > An acquaintance told about Reiki healing; part of which, as I was told, > involved human energy transfer to a subject and other entities such as > homeopathics. Correct me if I got that wrong. Same question here as above. > > > > MikeM > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 , how long did Kurt work on you and how long afterwards did you find yourself in remission? I see the deposit is $2K. How much more does his session cost? I would be hard pressed to come up with the 2K. Thank you. Toni D From: melizzard11 www.cancertouch.com Kurt is his name and he's flat-out amazing, IMO. Anything in particular you would like to know about my experience? xxoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.