Guest guest Posted May 17, 2010 Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 I heard him speak at the Weston Price conference last fall. He was really interesting. He is scheduling out to August - A friend of mine just had a friend call to make an appt with him. I don't know the cost but I would guess it will be expensive and being that his therapy isn't conventional he probably doesn't take insurance. But that's just a guess. I have heard good things about him and his success. From: robyn howell Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 Subject: [ ] Dr ? Does anyone have any knowledge of Dr. . Success rate? Cost, etc? Thanks, Robyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2010 Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 You do not have to guess. He does not participate with any insurance. It is all out of pocket. If you have an insurance policy that allows you to go to any doctor you want then you may get some re-imbursal but nowhere near what his fees are. The first appointment is a two day affair with all kinds of tests,etc. You have to pay $3600 up front even if you subsequently decide not to proceed. You have to be prepared to spend a minimum of $780 per month on Supplements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2010 Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 I heard an interview by him and he kind of dodged the success question. Thanks, Robyn I heard him speak at the Weston Price conference last fall. He was really interesting. He is scheduling out to August - A friend of mine just had a friend call to make an appt with him. I don't know the cost but I would guess it will be expensive and being that his therapy isn't conventional he probably doesn't take insurance. But that's just a guess. I have heard good things about him and his success. From: robyn howell Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 Subject: [ ] Dr ? Does anyone have any knowledge of Dr. . Success rate? Cost, etc? Thanks, Robyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 Probably for legal purposes so he doesn't get harassed and shut down. He can talk about what he's doing, or what he thinks he can do - but to outright suggest that he has " cured " anyone might raise red flags and the government would find ways to put him out of business. That's my guess as to why he won't talk about success publicly. Perhaps he's more specific during a consultation. I know I wouldn't want to pay all of that money without some assurance that it was going to work. > > I heard an interview by him and he kind of dodged the success question. > > Thanks, Robyn > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 I think his success rates are mediocre on average or moderate if you follow his program very vigorously, which entails about 200 pills/day (mostly pancreatic enzymes) and daily juicing and coffee enemas, a strict diet, and more. greatly exaggerates his success rate (as do most practitioners). I think the Kelley- regimen (and pancreatic enzymes in general) is most effective w/LEUKEMIA, lymphoma, melanoma, myeloma, soft-tissue sarcoma, & pancreatic cancer. I think it's least effective w/bone, brain and skin cancer (except for melanoma) and other cancers where circulation to the tumor is poor. Leonard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 Although his treatment might work for some - it looks like something almost impossible to follow. > > I think his success rates are mediocre on average or moderate if you follow his program very vigorously, which entails about 200 pills/day (mostly pancreatic enzymes) and daily juicing and coffee enemas, a strict diet, and more. greatly exaggerates his success rate (as do most practitioners). > I think the Kelley- regimen (and pancreatic enzymes in general) is most effective w/LEUKEMIA, lymphoma, melanoma, myeloma, soft-tissue sarcoma, & pancreatic cancer. > I think it's least effective w/bone, brain and skin cancer (except for melanoma) and other cancers where circulation to the tumor is poor. > > Leonard > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 Dr Kelley's protocol is different from Dr. as Dr. G. adjusted it as he saw fit based on his pratice. The cost is very high indeed and he turns down a LOT of people. Moreover, he does recommened chemo for some patients. e > > > > I think his success rates are mediocre on average or moderate if you follow his program very vigorously, which entails about 200 pills/day (mostly pancreatic enzymes) and daily juicing and coffee enemas, a strict diet, and more. greatly exaggerates his success rate (as do most practitioners). > > I think the Kelley- regimen (and pancreatic enzymes in general) is most effective w/LEUKEMIA, lymphoma, melanoma, myeloma, soft-tissue sarcoma, & pancreatic cancer. > > I think it's least effective w/bone, brain and skin cancer (except for melanoma) and other cancers where circulation to the tumor is poor. > > > > Leonard > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 I have been studying Dr. and his predecessor Dr. Kelley since I was diagnosed with lymphoma over 5 years ago (no formal treatment to date). I've read Dr. Kelley's book over 5 times and Dr. ' books also 5 times each. I've read every interview with them both available at their websites or on the internet. I practice as much of their protocols as I have been able to gather without being a formal patient of either (Dr. Kelley is deceased). That said, I believe their's and their predecessor Dr. Beard from the early 1900's who first proposed that stem cells (aka trophoblasts) were the cells that start cancer, and the key to controlling cancer is pancreatic enzymes, is the most accurate model/theory I've studied that makes perfect sense. I can go into more detail why if anyone is interested. Furthermore, Dr. Kelley was the first to propose that proper diet and detoxification were also key to reversing cancer. I believe this to be true also, and have taken his extensive questionaire which independantly confirms the type of cancer I have as well as my cravings and metabolism. I know Dr. has continued the role of diets in fighting cancer, that he learned from Dr. Kelley. I believe Dr. is a lot more successful than he lets on as someone pointed out, due to the intense pressure on him by Big Pharma and it's puppet organization the FDA since he is a threat to them. If you search his website and read all of the interviews, especially the New Yorker ones, you'll find he's very successful with most cancers. Although he won't use the word cured. As he gets older though, I believe he's taking fewer and fewer patients on. Finally, as important as diet, enzymes and detoxification is, and as much as I believe that these are crucial to fighting cancer, for me, the most important aspects to reversing lyphoma have been: - addressing mercury/heavy metals from silver fillings - addressing an overgrowth of Candida (a systemic fungal infection) - adding parts of the Budwig protocol (flax oil and cottage cheese) to my daily protocol Best regards, Steve PS - Dear Robyn - you did not mention what type of condition you or your loved one is facing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.