Guest guest Posted January 4, 2008 Report Share Posted January 4, 2008 I have had low testosterone for a good few years now. Originally I had boardline low testosterone levels of 10.2nmol/ and a nomral LH level. I had a Insulin Tollerance Test four years ago as well and that was perfectly normal and was 44 (UK reference) MU/L. I also had an MRI which was normal, prolactin levels were also normal and adrenal and thyroid hormones that were repeatedly very good/normal. So boarderline low testosterone looked to be the only issue. My health has gone dramatically downhill over the course of four years. I had a new Insulin Tollerance Test a few months ago and it showed that I now have low growth hormone with a UK level of 9mu/l (works out to around 3 of the US range). So we had a before and after test and can see that Growth Hormone has gone from 44mu/l to 9mu/l somehow in the last four years. I also came off testosterone for three months to see what my baseline testosterone level was and it now showed a level of 5.6nmol/l and my LH still normal. So my testosterone has gone from 10.6 to 5.6 and my growth hormone from 44 to 9. I has seemed that these values have plummeted in a way that has mirrored my continuingly worse health. A few months ago I started geting these sharp pains behind my left eye, just imtermitently- not like a headache. They have continued every week since, just now and again I get a sharp pain behind the eye. My eyes have subsequently started to swell up and my left eye in particular has swollen quite badley to the point where the eyelid cannot be seen and it is affecting my vision a little. Three weeks ago I had a prolactin test and it came back a little bit high. 378 Uk reference range (0-350). I had another test a week ago and that has come back also a little high 387 (0-350). What are the odds that the dropping of the baseline testosterone and growth hormone levels and the now growth hormone deficiency (doctors are trying to get me on GH therapy) is down to a prolactinoma or pituitary tumor? I thought that prolactin was usually through the roof before it ever caused significant issues? Is this just a red herring or is this the cause of everything? could a problem have been missed on the original MRI? Obviously no one can say, but I would be very interested to hear peoples thoughts on this? What does that level come to on the US range? Would that prolactin level be an issue at all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.