Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 >>A sickening but appropriate champion of this approachwas Herman Goebbels.<< Similarly, you could have compared this to watching the debate on embryonic stem cell research in the congress trying to overturn Bush's veto last year. Sickening also. All the scientists and physicians in congress presented a strong scientific and moral argument as to why research should be funded, and the far religious right congressmen all ranted like a bad televangelist. In the end, the congressional chickens were too worried about their next election and did not have enough votes to overturn the veto. That was a sad day for science IMHO. These were stem cell lines that were either to be discarded or too outdated to be useful for fertilization, and these morons preferred to throw them out on religious grounds. The world is still flat to some of those guys. From: joe wouk <joseph.wouk@...>Subject: [low dose naltrexone] Rob, they don't care if they sound obnoxious or stupid... They are pro psychlow dose naltrexone Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 11:22 PM manipulators.The goal is to create an aura of "discomfort" around the subject ofLDN. The arguments don't matter. It's the "bad vibes" that most sickpeople can't handle, so they'd just rather not have LDN talked aboutif it was going to ruin the good feeling in the forum.Get it?I never got one intelligent argument against LDN, just viciousfulminating and character assassination. This is because:a. There IS no intelligent argument against LDN.b. Psychological manipulation is much more effective than intellectualconvincing. A sickening but appropriate champion of this approachwas Herman Goebbels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.