Guest guest Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 This tid bit from a transcript of the DC gathering involving Kirby. quick note: The rhetoric in this debate sometimes gets very heated and very personal. And I always do try to endeavor to keep the tone to a moderate level. You may have received a letter this morning from Every Child By Two, and in that letter, basically decrying this briefing, they said that people like me, people who want to investigate this possible link, are trying to sidetrack the search for the real causes of autism,and sidetrack the search for actual treatments. That is a very inflammatory statement. To accuse anyone of not wanting to treat autistic children is morally wrong in my mind, and I think that that type of rhetoric really needs to be damped down a little bit. I called the woman who wrote that letter this morning, Amy Pisani, and she actually apologized to me, and I accept her apology. But there is no place in this debate for that kind of language. I also pointed out to Amy Pisani that Autism Speaks just authorized some $3 million in autism research funding for environmental causes of autism, including vaccines, and there are three special grants for Thimerosal. Amy told me that Autism Speaks was succumbing to parental pressure, and that they just did this to " appease " the people who want to see that type of research. That was an insult to the scientific committee at Autism Speaks. They did not fund these studies to appease anyone; they funded these studies because this debate and this research continues. --------------------------------- To this I'd say that the no-show, un-scientific committee of Autism Speaks deserves Congressional investigation. Perhaps Kirby might join them to explain his role in this fiasco,no-show cabal? Did ignore the fact that Autism Speaks hired people to testify AGAINST our vaccine injured children before the special masters. Didn't Kirby ruin the media coverage of the Cedillo hearings by creating a distractive " rift " between Autism Speaks daddy and Autism Speaks daughter? Did Kirby ignore the fact that AS science AKA NAAR is plagued with a history of drug company funding since their establishment in 1994? Yes, since 1994. Why is that? Were all the autism advocates before 1994 not smart enough to research autism? Or could it be that those CDC green lizard men or pharma black-ops monitoring the proliferation of Thimerosal-containing vaccine doses not only saw, but were actually anticipating Autism rates to climb? Come to papa, autism. Come to papa. Since 1998 as the organization NAAR (the AS science committee) along with the ASA, another heavy CAA cabalist, have collected lots and lots of brain tissue from deceased autistic individuals. http://www.naar.org/research/atp.htm <http://www.naar.org/research/atp.htm> Clearly if there weren't elevated levels of mercury, evidence of mercury toxicity damage in this tissue they would have shouted it from the roof-tops. Do you doubt it? These CAA cabalist people trashed their reputations by stabbing our children in the back. They can not be trusted to act in the interests of our children or our families. Their loyalty to the vaccine industry is their own choice, but they should not be allowed to claim they are speaking for our children. They are not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.