Guest guest Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 It sounds like Krigsman may be one of the few GI docs that gets the gut/autism connection in many cases. My problem with him, and other ground breakers like him, such as Neubrander, Yasko etc, to name a few, is that they do " get " it in a big way on a lot of things, and have done some really good research, and have come up with some great treatments, anti inflammatory gut healing, B12, HBOT, the whole genetic approach, the gut approach, whatever their particular " forte " happens to be, and for this research, I say " kudos " to them. But, however, my problem is, they charge what appear to be exorbitant fees, and in this way seem as exploitative in terms of money as mainstream docs that push the shots and big Pharma drugs, IMHO. Ok, I know the difference is, their treatments, may actually help your kid. I know there are those who will say, they came up with the treatment, so they can charge what they want. Ok, I guess they can. But they are charging desperate parents a lot of money, and they know that a lot of it is not covered by insurance, and most of us just can't afford their treatments and pay for supps too. And, I would have to ask myself, every minute is everything they are pushing really something my kid needs, or is this just a money maker? We had this experience with some prior well regarded DAN docs, who pushed certain things on us, for questionable reasons. I guess my mistake is thinking that if you do this vital research and go against the vast majority of your profession in helping unravel the puzzle of autism, that you might have more altruistic motives, and want to reach and help as many parents as you can, not only those who are willing and able to fork over hefty fees. It seems I am starting to adopt Andy's disdain for the medical profession I guess. I keep hoping that chelation will continue to provide benefits for my child along with the other supplements and anti virals. I know there are many here who have healed and are healing their kids without the benefit of scopes etc, such as Dana, and having great success. They are a beacon of hope to me and my family. Irene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Well said, Irene. I could not have said it better myself. I feel that if their motivation was to truly help these kids, they would and they wouldn't be charging such exorbitant fees to do so. They're laughing all the way to the bank while we're eating ramen noodles and kraft macaroni and cheese. I guess that's the difference between these doctors and many parents like us - we share what we know without charging a dime for it. I have spent countless amounts of time answering emails and talking to strangers on the phone trying to help other parents - and don't expect or want anything for it - I just have hope that the parents that all of us help pay it forward to the next parent who needs help. Making a living is one thing, gouging parents who are broke and going farther and farther into debt.. well, I just don't know what to really say to accurately describe the way I feel about that. From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of iflow97 Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 4:29 PM Subject: [ ] RE: Krigsman and then what?? It sounds like Krigsman may be one of the few GI docs that gets the gut/autism connection in many cases. My problem with him, and other ground breakers like him, such as Neubrander, Yasko etc, to name a few, is that they do " get " it in a big way on a lot of things, and have done some really good research, and have come up with some great treatments, anti inflammatory gut healing, B12, HBOT, the whole genetic approach, the gut approach, whatever their particular " forte " happens to be, and for this research, I say " kudos " to them. But, however, my problem is, they charge what appear to be exorbitant fees, and in this way seem as exploitative in terms of money as mainstream docs that push the shots and big Pharma drugs, IMHO. Ok, I know the difference is, their treatments, may actually help your kid. I know there are those who will say, they came up with the treatment, so they can charge what they want. Ok, I guess they can. But they are charging desperate parents a lot of money, and they know that a lot of it is not covered by insurance, and most of us just can't afford their treatments and pay for supps too. And, I would have to ask myself, every minute is everything they are pushing really something my kid needs, or is this just a money maker? We had this experience with some prior well regarded DAN docs, who pushed certain things on us, for questionable reasons. I guess my mistake is thinking that if you do this vital research and go against the vast majority of your profession in helping unravel the puzzle of autism, that you might have more altruistic motives, and want to reach and help as many parents as you can, not only those who are willing and able to fork over hefty fees. It seems I am starting to adopt Andy's disdain for the medical profession I guess. I keep hoping that chelation will continue to provide benefits for my child along with the other supplements and anti virals. I know there are many here who have healed and are healing their kids without the benefit of scopes etc, such as Dana, and having great success. They are a beacon of hope to me and my family. Irene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Irene, I have that same disdain myself now. Whatever happen to being a human being? I think it's almost criminal to exploit parents for these sums of money to find out what they already know sometimes. We had a DAN who wanted $500 just to see us, which required traveling, and that fee did not include ANY testing, nor looking at ANY testing we already had done. We would have to pay extra for that. I thought about it and said for what? I already know the child is metal toxic. I don't need to pay this guy to tell me that. We saw a few specialists in our area and that was with insurance, and they were useless. I got 'this is the way your kid is born', 'there's not much you can do', 'his brain is just wired different'. Stupid crap like that, despite the fact that his hair was pretty much made of LEAD and Antimony and Arsenic and silver, tin, cadmium, But everyone I showed the test too..dismissed. No way that could be the problem. Rather than deal with it, they ignored it. I went through the same thing with my daughter's thyroid. No way that could be the problem, even though the labs say it is. I guess, I'm saying tread carefully with doctors, be aware of how much money they are charging you and what you will receive for that amount. Honestly, if I were one of these breakthrough doctors, I would not be putting profits ahead of the kids. Just like I don't charge anyone here for any resources I provide them, or any help. Making a living is one thing, robbing the innocent and sick is another. I have not seen the doctor in question, hopefully someone has and can help her make a good choice. But honestly, what i have found is either you get no answers or you find out what you already know. These kids have gut pathogens. yeast, bacteria, parasites. Those things cause inflammation. will drugs help that?..I don't know. Will removing the parasites, bacteria and yeast..yes. Will changing the diet? yes. But I tend to agree that if some of the doctors motivations were true, they would not be charging insane amounts of money. Some of them see our kids as cash cows. That is how oncologist see cancer patients....as money. Also beware of what claims are made to you. Do they promise cure? Treatment? Do they push supplements they also sell? Look for conflicts of interest with pharma companies and hospitals and grant money etc. Is the place a revolving door or patients? Do they spent more than 3 minutes with you? Are they listening too you and respecting you? Are they working with your or telling you what to do? Is what they are doing, something you can do yourself? Many things to consider. And as always Trust your Gut! If you get a bad vibe, then trust it. If you felt uneasy with the doctor, then trust that as your sign to leave. > > Well said, Irene. I could not have said it better myself. > > > > I feel that if their motivation was to truly help these kids, they would and > they wouldn't be charging such exorbitant fees to do so. They're laughing > all the way to the bank while we're eating ramen noodles and kraft macaroni > and cheese. > > > > I guess that's the difference between these doctors and many parents like us > - we share what we know without charging a dime for it. I have spent > countless amounts of time answering emails and talking to strangers on the > phone trying to help other parents - and don't expect or want anything for > it - I just have hope that the parents that all of us help pay it forward to > the next parent who needs help. Making a living is one thing, gouging > parents who are broke and going farther and farther into debt.. well, I just > don't know what to really say to accurately describe the way I feel about > that. > > > > From: [mailto: ] > On Behalf Of iflow97 > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 4:29 PM > > Subject: [ ] RE: Krigsman and then what?? > > > > It sounds like Krigsman may be one of the few GI docs that gets the > gut/autism connection in many cases. My problem with him, and other > ground breakers like him, such as Neubrander, Yasko etc, to name a > few, is that they do " get " it in a big way on a lot of things, and > have done some really good research, and have come up with some great > treatments, anti inflammatory gut healing, B12, HBOT, the whole > genetic approach, the gut approach, whatever their particular " forte " > happens to be, and for this research, I say " kudos " to them. But, > however, my problem is, they charge what appear to be exorbitant fees, > and in this way seem as exploitative in terms of money as mainstream > docs that push the shots and big Pharma drugs, IMHO. Ok, I know the > difference is, their treatments, may actually help your kid. > > I know there are those who will say, they came up with the treatment, > so they can charge what they want. Ok, I guess they can. But they are > charging desperate parents a lot of money, and they know that a lot of > it is not covered by insurance, and most of us just can't afford their > treatments and pay for supps too. And, I would have to ask myself, > every minute is everything they are pushing really something my kid > needs, or is this just a money maker? We had this experience with > some prior well regarded DAN docs, who pushed certain things on us, > for questionable reasons. I guess my mistake is thinking that if you > do this vital research and go against the vast majority of your > profession in helping unravel the puzzle of autism, that you might > have more altruistic motives, and want to reach and help as many > parents as you can, not only those who are willing and able to fork > over hefty fees. > > It seems I am starting to adopt Andy's disdain for the medical > profession I guess. I keep hoping that chelation will continue to > provide benefits for my child along with the other supplements and > anti virals. I know there are many here who have healed and are > healing their kids without the benefit of scopes etc, such as Dana, > and having great success. They are a beacon of hope to me and my family. > > Irene > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 I reread what I just wrote and I want to make sure that I clarify that when I said " Is it too much trouble to give them relief from their gastro issues? " I am refering to the doctors in our society. I am not referring to mothers. I know that all our kids are different and the Dr. K approach is not the way to go for all and I know that all of us mothers are consistantly going to " too much trouble " for our kids. I am not suggesting if you haven't seen Dr. K that it is because it is too much trouble. I am saying if we have an autistic child with gut issues that can not be helped with diet alone, why in our society is it so difficult to get that child help by traditional means via a doctor. > > Well said, Irene. I could not have said it better myself. > > > > I feel that if their motivation was to truly help these kids, they would and > they wouldn't be charging such exorbitant fees to do so. They're laughing > all the way to the bank while we're eating ramen noodles and kraft macaroni > and cheese. > > > > I guess that's the difference between these doctors and many parents like us > - we share what we know without charging a dime for it. I have spent > countless amounts of time answering emails and talking to strangers on the > phone trying to help other parents - and don't expect or want anything for > it - I just have hope that the parents that all of us help pay it forward to > the next parent who needs help. Making a living is one thing, gouging > parents who are broke and going farther and farther into debt.. well, I just > don't know what to really say to accurately describe the way I feel about > that. > > > > From: [mailto:Autism- Mercury ] > On Behalf Of iflow97 > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 4:29 PM > > Subject: [ ] RE: Krigsman and then what?? > > > > It sounds like Krigsman may be one of the few GI docs that gets the > gut/autism connection in many cases. My problem with him, and other > ground breakers like him, such as Neubrander, Yasko etc, to name a > few, is that they do " get " it in a big way on a lot of things, and > have done some really good research, and have come up with some great > treatments, anti inflammatory gut healing, B12, HBOT, the whole > genetic approach, the gut approach, whatever their particular " forte " > happens to be, and for this research, I say " kudos " to them. But, > however, my problem is, they charge what appear to be exorbitant fees, > and in this way seem as exploitative in terms of money as mainstream > docs that push the shots and big Pharma drugs, IMHO. Ok, I know the > difference is, their treatments, may actually help your kid. > > I know there are those who will say, they came up with the treatment, > so they can charge what they want. Ok, I guess they can. But they are > charging desperate parents a lot of money, and they know that a lot of > it is not covered by insurance, and most of us just can't afford their > treatments and pay for supps too. And, I would have to ask myself, > every minute is everything they are pushing really something my kid > needs, or is this just a money maker? We had this experience with > some prior well regarded DAN docs, who pushed certain things on us, > for questionable reasons. I guess my mistake is thinking that if you > do this vital research and go against the vast majority of your > profession in helping unravel the puzzle of autism, that you might > have more altruistic motives, and want to reach and help as many > parents as you can, not only those who are willing and able to fork > over hefty fees. > > It seems I am starting to adopt Andy's disdain for the medical > profession I guess. I keep hoping that chelation will continue to > provide benefits for my child along with the other supplements and > anti virals. I know there are many here who have healed and are > healing their kids without the benefit of scopes etc, such as Dana, > and having great success. They are a beacon of hope to me and my family. > > Irene > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 We are a patient of Dr. Neubrander and an appointment with him is $$$. That is why we see the PA. It is good that they make him available for 1/2 the cost. Also, after much debate about whether or not to buy a HBOT through their office (due to cost) we finally decided to go ahead and make the purchase. When I called the office and told Rick Neubrander that I wanted to buy a HBOT through them, he said that they had a patient that was wanting to sell their HBOT, if I bought it used through them I could save a lot of $$$. If it was all about money, why did they do that for me? They lost a lot of money doing that for me. I also honestly think that office wants to help our kids. That is not to say they aren't making money, they are, but I do think they are interested in helping our kids and our families too. > > It sounds like Krigsman may be one of the few GI docs that gets the > gut/autism connection in many cases. My problem with him, and other > ground breakers like him, such as Neubrander, Yasko etc, to name a > few, is that they do " get " it in a big way on a lot of things, and > have done some really good research, and have come up with some great > treatments, anti inflammatory gut healing, B12, HBOT, the whole > genetic approach, the gut approach, whatever their particular " forte " > happens to be, and for this research, I say " kudos " to them. But, > however, my problem is, they charge what appear to be exorbitant fees, > and in this way seem as exploitative in terms of money as mainstream > docs that push the shots and big Pharma drugs, IMHO. Ok, I know the > difference is, their treatments, may actually help your kid. > > I know there are those who will say, they came up with the treatment, > so they can charge what they want. Ok, I guess they can. But they are > charging desperate parents a lot of money, and they know that a lot of > it is not covered by insurance, and most of us just can't afford their > treatments and pay for supps too. And, I would have to ask myself, > every minute is everything they are pushing really something my kid > needs, or is this just a money maker? We had this experience with > some prior well regarded DAN docs, who pushed certain things on us, > for questionable reasons. I guess my mistake is thinking that if you > do this vital research and go against the vast majority of your > profession in helping unravel the puzzle of autism, that you might > have more altruistic motives, and want to reach and help as many > parents as you can, not only those who are willing and able to fork > over hefty fees. > > It seems I am starting to adopt Andy's disdain for the medical > profession I guess. I keep hoping that chelation will continue to > provide benefits for my child along with the other supplements and > anti virals. I know there are many here who have healed and are > healing their kids without the benefit of scopes etc, such as Dana, > and having great success. They are a beacon of hope to me and my family. > > Irene > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 Some DAN's are very reasonable and also accept insurance. Some are expensive and don't accept insurance and you have to pay all that up front. You have to find a doctor that is sincere in their desire to really help your child and it not be all about money. There are doctors out there that are pediatricians, accept insurance and charge a reasonable fee. We saw one of the most well known DAN's for 3 years and we never paid her one dime. She accepted all our insurance. We paid a lot for Krigsman and it was 5 years ago, but got some back with our insurance but not all........... Kathy [ ] RE: Krigsman and then what?? >> >> >> >> It sounds like Krigsman may be one of the few GI docs that gets the >> gut/autism connection in many cases. My problem with him, and other >> ground breakers like him, such as Neubrander, Yasko etc, to name a >> few, is that they do " get " it in a big way on a lot of things, and >> have done some really good research, and have come up with some great >> treatments, anti inflammatory gut healing, B12, HBOT, the whole >> genetic approach, the gut approach, whatever their particular " forte " >> happens to be, and for this research, I say " kudos " to them. But, >> however, my problem is, they charge what appear to be exorbitant fees, >> and in this way seem as exploitative in terms of money as mainstream >> docs that push the shots and big Pharma drugs, IMHO. Ok, I know the >> difference is, their treatments, may actually help your kid. >> >> I know there are those who will say, they came up with the treatment, >> so they can charge what they want. Ok, I guess they can. But they are >> charging desperate parents a lot of money, and they know that a lot of >> it is not covered by insurance, and most of us just can't afford their >> treatments and pay for supps too. And, I would have to ask myself, >> every minute is everything they are pushing really something my kid >> needs, or is this just a money maker? We had this experience with >> some prior well regarded DAN docs, who pushed certain things on us, >> for questionable reasons. I guess my mistake is thinking that if you >> do this vital research and go against the vast majority of your >> profession in helping unravel the puzzle of autism, that you might >> have more altruistic motives, and want to reach and help as many >> parents as you can, not only those who are willing and able to fork >> over hefty fees. >> >> It seems I am starting to adopt Andy's disdain for the medical >> profession I guess. I keep hoping that chelation will continue to >> provide benefits for my child along with the other supplements and >> anti virals. I know there are many here who have healed and are >> healing their kids without the benefit of scopes etc, such as Dana, >> and having great success. They are a beacon of hope to me and my family. >> >> Irene >> >> >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.