Guest guest Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 " Challenges " force a large dose of chelator through the body; kidneys, liver. Must are too weak in those organs to support that kind of assult. Plus it " redistributes " the metals around the body through the bloodstream causing MORE MERCURY TO BE REDEPOSITED INTO THE BRAIN, LIVER, KIDNEYS. It is counterproductive and creates more of a mess too clean up. Andy adamently opposes large amounts of chelators because the body is inefficient in getting it out. Explained in scientific detail in Diagnosis and Treatment of Amalgam Illness. An IV of a chelator does the same thing. Too much chelator that will make any mercury already in the body go deeper into those delicate organs you are TRYING to get it out of. Both can cause regression. My 50 year old brother " to prove a point " did two challenges after I said don't. He started stuttering, and is still having problems. www.dmpsbackfire.com For adverse reactions to IV's of chelators. Andy's theory is simple and makes sense. A smaller amount of chelator, more frequently based on the half life of the medicine, soooooo.... at the end of a campaign, like 4 days, you get a small amount that's dumped out. With IV's you get a HUGE amount dumped out. And redistribution. The goal is do teeny amounts of chelator that can bind to gently lifted metals, then excreted in small amounts. The half life is so the active ingredient of chelator never causes a " dump " of metals, but a gentle continual pulling. No on and off dumping that's hard on the system. Slow even pulls that the body can handle. Takes longer, but much safer. His book is a must read, with diagrams. It's chemistry, smaller dose, more frequently = less problems. SAFER. You flush out water heaters because of the sediment of metals on the bottom of the water heater. Well chelators flush out metals, but our bodies are much more complex and delicate than a water heater. Trust Andy. He's researched it, and can explain it. Those Dr.'s do not have the knowledge and experience Andy does. We here are living proof. And most of us know people that have done it wrong and gotten horrible results. It just makes sense. Research it first. Stop IV's. Alison F. There are some people that say IV's of chelators are helping there kids, but not on this board. Andy will tell you it's bad for everyone, but some of us WAY worse. Don't risk it. 3.3. Re: Worst mother here~Sorry I started something Posted by: " RnD & TnT " tnt4nd@... tabors007 Date: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:11 pm ((PDT)) so controversy, I truly just wanted info. on how to get my little one better, that's all! So I hope I do not open another can of worms by asking this: Why is IV Chelation so bad in~ your opinion? Also, thank you for all that responded I truly appreciate your help, insight & of course prayers~ Darlene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.