what's affront in changing a subject line? // was: Re: Vote For McCain-Palin

November 4, 2008

>

> What is it that you are saying was done that you think is

> improper?

>

> The changing headers part sounds **courteous** to me. Generally

> people who change the subject on posts are doing so to reflect

> what they are commenting about. I do it when I'm paying attention,

> and occassionally forget to. NOT changing the subject line is

> more where I would think there's a problem.

===>Not on this list, I got called a " liar " by the moderator for changing the

post heading. That's a no no here.

Salespeople are allowed to continually spew their mistruths and unvalidated

claims, but I'm the liar.

November 11, 2008

If you click Reply Via Web Post, the system will include that reply

within that same thread NO MATTER what the subject line reads.

If you want to make a new subject the end of the web address line

should simply read /post and NOT something like this:

/post?act=reply & messageNum=242314

>

> Huh, so there's some method where groups will post a message

> that is listed in the message list with one subject, but the

> individual message, when viewed, lists another subject.

>

> Okay. So, how do you do this? And do you think groups'

> has some purpose in mind for this feature or do you think it

> is unintentional on their part? (any evidence one way or the other?)

Recommended Posts