Re: State of State Training and Resource Centres (STRC)

[Guest guest]

Dear all,

/message/11610

This issue and the funding of Outreach Worker positions should become

matters of Urgency for discussion at the International AIDS Conference in July

2010 in Vienna, AUSTRIA.

I can only afford to go as a working Volunteer this year but I will be on the

lookout for anyone who wants to raise or speak to the issue.

Geoffrey

--

Geoff Heaviside

e-mail: <geofheav@...>

[Guest guest]

Dear all,

Re: /message/11610

In addition to this, it will be good to ensure that the TI NGOs exist and do

their alloted work. Because many of the TI NGOs are existing in paper and do not

actually work.

But we keep on saying this and that will be looked after by TI NGOs. Unless NACO

and SACS act transperently, TI NGOs will only become better and not the society

or affected community.

Dr.S.Raman

e-mail: <tenthplanet@...>

[Guest guest]

Dear Forum members,

Re: /message/11626

I also support the statement of Dr.S.Raman. I think that there was uncertain or

sudden reporting system  and implementing new concepts were forced the TI NGOs

to concentrate more on paper work rather than filed .

 

The targeted people are moveable in nature. It is also making the TI NGO in to

the burden situation. 

 

Anyway, the streamlining of the activities of the projects and implementers may

help to get the expected outcome and results in an effective way .

 

Regards

 

Saravanan

Saravanan Durairaj

e-mail: <saravanancool@...>

[Guest guest]

Dear Geoff,

Re: /message/11620

Its been after a while I am connecting once again with you as I fail to access

my e-mail account due to unforseen condition, but its very fortunate that we

meet for the good cause.

As I had already shared my bitter experience regarding my discontinuation of my

job as PLHIV Coordinator in manipur state AIDS Control Society (MSACS), India

which can be taken up as a common problem face by many in our community.

At this very nodal agency only 2 of us who are HIV+ve are recruited as staff as

Gipa Coordinator and PLHIV coordinator.

Regarding this matter I am really concern why the post PLHIV Coordinator

contract is not extended which can be fit in any available services besides

giving more concern in PPTCT area which is a part of basic service components.

In this area it will be very realistic to raise the concern area to be more

effective so as to continue the working area with much excitement dealing with

the ongoing problems and issues for the

PLHA community as a whole.

What actually needs to address from my point of view is to really take good

notice about the concept and principles of GIPA to all the existing staffs who

are working in the state nodal agency.

This will surely create a room and time for the higher up official in the nodal

agency to rethink about the effective response, PLHAs can play possessing the

post instead ignoring without much concern.

On one side it is also a high time to address the issues related with job

facilities own and possessed by any PLHA in such a reputed agency which

represents the nation as a whole. Few quick points which relate with the above

mentioned are:

1) Its not the effective and useful gameplan removing a PLHA staff where only

few are appointed which have a total strength of more than 100 staffs.

2) It will be more convenient if enough time is given to the PLHA staffs even if

it is necessary to discontinue the service contract rather exercising their

rules or norms out of a sudden in no time without giving any sort of reason.

3) Also it will be more systematic if the said few PLHAs post can be adjusted to

certain workable areas which will never end with this ongoing working nature and

its control and preventive programme.

4) Lastly, every PLHA will be very fortunate acknowledging the long struggle

which the parental agencies or firms associated with it, enough space and right

opportunity is provided to every single PLHAs.

  

With regards.

M. Pushpakanta Singh.  

e-mail: <vision_boy30@...>