Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

For Health Secy, Orissa - Stop Hep-B vaccine.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

To

Ms Anu Garg,

Health Secretary

Govt of Orissa

Orissa Secretariat

Bhubaneswar.

DT: 25.11.2008

Sub: Hep-B Vaccine to Infants in Orissa.

Madam,

This has reference to my earlier letter on the subject wherein I had enclosed a

study on the Hep-B vaccine that linked it to disability in children. I now

include a PGIMER review of existing studies on the vaccine by Dr J L Mathew

that questions the efficacy of the Hep-B vaccine.

 

The review states, " In people not previously exposed to hepatitis B,

vaccination has unclear effect on the risk of developing infection, as compared

to no vaccination. The risk of lacking protective antibody levels as well as

serious and non-serious adverse events appear comparable among recipients and

non-recipients of hepatitis B vaccine. "

 

In other words the vaccine is ineffective.

 

The review cautions that, " Hepatitis B vaccination is reported to be

beneficial in some specific groups of people such as babies born to women

infected with hepatitis B, health-care workers, and people with long-standing

kidney failure. "

 

There is absolutely no reason to give this vaccine indiscriminately to infants

as has become the practice now ostensibly to gear up sales of this highly

dubious vaccine.

 

Regarding mass immunisation the review mentions, " This contrasts the strategy

of universal immunisation, wherein all individuals are vaccinated, irrespective

of individual risk. Universal immunisation can be used in populations with high

prevalence of hepatitis B infection and where it is difficult to identify

individuals at highest risk (Chen 1996). This is economically and logistically

more demanding and its success also depends on vaccination compliance.

Individuals at high risk frequently refuse vaccination or fail to complete the

vaccination series (Wong 1994; Nystrom 2000). "

 

This review confirms my earlier allegation that high risk groups, towards whom

this vaccine was originally targeted, shun this vaccine.

 

The review admits, " However, no meta-analyses or systematic reviews have

addressed the issue of immunisation in persons who are not at high risk of

hepatitis B exposure or individuals in the general population whose hepatitis B

exposure status is not known. "

 

This review of existing studies finds that, " This review highlights the paucity

of methodologically sound trials (trials with low risk of bias) to address the

central issue of whether or not hepatitis B vaccination protects against

hepatitis B. As is the case with many vaccine trials, most hepatitis B vaccine

trials also report limited outcomes such as antibody levels one month after

vaccination along with recording a few adverse events. It has already been

emphasised that post-vaccination antibodies are only a surrogate outcome that is

believed or expected to correlate with protective efficacy.

Our review highlights several gaps in existing knowledge about hepatitis B

vaccine. Some of these include information about serious adverse events, the

concentration of antibodies generated by vaccination, duration of protective

effect, the risk of developing infection if exposed during the vaccination

series and the nature of long-term protection afforded by vaccination. A major

missing piece is the cost-effectiveness as compared to not vaccinating a cohort

of individuals. "

 

This confirms that the vaccine has been pushed in a hurry and without proper

trials forcing the reviewers to revisit them and draw their conclusions.

 

Regarding the incidence of Hep-B in India a study published in Indian Pediatrics

2007 Sep 7;44 (9):663-675 17921555 titled, " Sytematic Review and meta analysis

of Prevalence of Hepatitis B in India " states, " The true prevalence (of Hep-B)

 in non-tribal populations is 2.4% (95% CI: 2.2% - 2.7%).. True prevalence

among tribal populations is 15.9% (CI: 11.4% -20.4%). " Thus universal

immunisation with this vaccine is clearly unwarranted.

 

It will be worthwhile to find out if the doctors recommend this vaccine for

their own children and relatives. Such an investigation would complete the

picture. Investigations that have been carried out to know the immunisation

status of the wards of physicians have revealed that they are not given the OPV,

DTP, MMR, Hib amongst others.

 

I will once again request you to kindly stop giving this useless but decidely

harmful vaccine to the children of Orissa and also instruct the private

practitioners to refrain from recommending and administering it.  

 

Kindly acknowledge receipt.

 

Yours faithfully,

Jagannath Chatterjee

Plot no 1181/2146, Ratnakar Bag - 2

Tankapani Road,

Bhubaneswar - 751018

Mob: 9337102146

 

cc: All those interested in the life & health of the children of Orissa.

 

Encl:

1: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD006481. Links

Hepatitis B immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis B or

with unknown exposure status.

Mathew JL, El Dib R, Mathew PJ, Boxall EH, Brok J.

Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of

Medial Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, 160012.

jlmathew@...

BACKGROUND: The benefits and harms of hepatitis B vaccination in persons not

previously exposed to hepatitis B infection or with unknown exposure status have

not been established. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of hepatitis

B vaccination in people not previously exposed to hepatitis B infection or with

unknown exposure status. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified from The

Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central

Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS,Science

Citation Index Expanded (last search, March 2007). Additionally, we contacted

experts and vaccine manufacturers, and read through reference lists for eligible

trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing hepatitis B

vaccine versus placebo, no intervention, or another vaccine in persons not

previously exposed to hepatitis B (HBsAg negative) or with unknown exposure

status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

The primary outcome was hepatitis B infection (detecting HBsAg, HBeAg, HBV DNA,

or anti-HBc). Secondary outcomes were lack of sero-protection, antibody titre,

clinical complications, adverse events, lack of compliance, and

cost-effectiveness. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR)

with 95% confidence interval (CI), using intention-to-treat analysis assuming an

unfavourable event for missing data. Sensitivity analyses based on

methodological quality (risk of bias), available data analysis,

intention-to-treat analysis assuming a favourable event for missing data,

best-case scenario, and worst-case scenario were conducted. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve

trials were eligible. All had high risk of bias and reporting was inconsistent.

Hepatitis B vaccine did not show a clear effect on the risk of developing HBsAg

(RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03, 4 trials, 1230 participants) and anti-HBc (RR

0.81, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.07; 4 trials, 1230 participants,

random-effects) when data were analysed using intention-to-treat analysis

assuming an unfavourable event for missing data. Analysis based on data of

available participants showed reduced risk of developing HBsAg (RR 0.12, 95% CI

0.03 to 0.44, 4 trials, 576 participants) and anti-HBc (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to

0.76, 4 trials, 576 participants, random-effects). Intention-to-treat analysis

assuming favourable outcome for missing data showed similar reduction in risk.

Hepatitis B vaccination had an unclear effect on the risk of lacking protective

antibody levels (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.27, 3 trials, 1210 participants,

random-effects). Development of adverse events was sparsely reported. AUTHORS'

CONCLUSIONS: In people not previously exposed to hepatitis B, vaccination has

unclear effect on the risk of developing infection, as compared to no

vaccination. The risk of lacking protective antibody levels as well as serious

and non-serious adverse events appear

comparable among recipients and non-recipients of hepatitis B vaccine.

PMID: 18677780

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on

http://help./l/in//mail/mail/tools/tools-08.html/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...