what's affront in changing a subject line? // was: Re: Vote For McCain-Palin

[Guest guest]

Huh, so there's some method where groups will post a message

that is listed in the message list with one subject, but the

individual message, when viewed, lists another subject.

Okay. So, how do you do this? And do you think groups'

has some purpose in mind for this feature or do you think it

is unintentional on their part? (any evidence one way or the other?)

Also, sorry to take a week to reply -- I've been pretty

snowed under.

thanks,

Moria

> > >

> > > Hi Dana,

> > >

> > > I don't think there was any evidence to suggest list moderation

> had

> > > anything to do with my post being " vacated " . If I thought so I

> know

> > > how to contact you.

> > >

> > > The affront was deliberate and the lack of substance and childish

> > > behavior in gutting the message and converting the header is

> > > completely telling.

> >

> > What is it that you are saying was done that you think is

> > improper?

> >

> > The changing headers part sounds **courteous** to me. Generally

> > people who change the subject on posts are doing so to reflect

> > what they are commenting about. I do it when I'm paying attention,

> > and occassionally forget to. NOT changing the subject line is

> > more where I would think there's a problem.

> >

> > And by " gutted " do you mean the responses quoted only a portion

> > of your text? That's also something would generally think is

> > appropriate and helpful. But, I don't know if that's what you

> > are saying is an affront.

> >

> > Moria

> > >

> >

>