Guest guest Posted October 15, 2008 Report Share Posted October 15, 2008 hen you invent " the microscope " to neurological damage that no one else has - you can describe and follow a neurological world that no one else can - but then, for those who wish your help, you can then share these observations that no one else can see...but then, thoise you share this with can see it to... Coincidentally, when you can nbow see the neurological damage from vaccine induced autism, yu can tell, most clearly, whether a particular intervention (like chelation), actually stands up to the alleged claims of " neurological recovery. " As we now see, there are improvements in behavior and function with chelation, but most remarkably, we have yet to see any recovery of the core neurological damage. We sincerely invite anyone who claims recovery from chelation to the core neurological damage to send us video and pictures from before and after chelation - if chelation is a cure for autism (at the neurological and brain level) - then we will see it... We look forward to validating these so-called " curea " and " recovery " that p[eople have been promoting for autistic children. Once again, my open invitation goes out to trest Dr Cutler's methods and " put them to empirical validation " - if chelation is curing autism, and if mercury chelation cures the neurological damage we can now measure -then more power to these methods. The sad reality now is this: Anyone who claims to have some " new and improved " technique or method for curing autism - we can tell you whether you just flushed your money down the drain for yet another " cure " that has only alleviated symptoms, and not directly addressed the hard the neurological cause of the autistic features. Since the kidneys are adversely affected, chelation is helpful to remove toxins from the body that the kidneys can longer remove on their own. However,sicne mercury toxicity is NOT the cause of autism, then this is not a cure but a symptom management intervention. www.BrainGuardMD.com team BrainGuardMD.com Neurodevelopmental report and Strategy Via: email †" October 15th, 2008 Good am XXXXX; We have been Working on XXXXXX’s images you have uploaded. Thank-you for your organization and the detailed dates for all the photos. We definitely see the " MASS " response in XXXXX. The ischemic process first kicked in (mildly) around two months of age. This process and the brain injuries were not apparent in the earlier photos. At 3 months of age, the process was still active, at least in terms of the micro vascular damage that was occurring. We see this largely in terms of the right brainstem micro vascular territories being occluded and affecting neurological functional controls of the XXXXXXX architecture. At nine months of age, the micro vascular ischemic " MASS " response, relative to the brain, remained and it is from this point forward that neurological damage has remained in terms of the adverse effects on cognitive, motor, and sensory functions. Several cranial nerves, in watershed vascular territories, have been adversely affected. This includes the X,Xth, and X cranial nerves (on the right). You may notice that your son likely tilts his head slightly to the left, more times than not, while he attempts to focus images within the field of gaze. This is an unconscious adaptive response in order to align the visual inputs from the eyes to compensate for a slight vertical gaze palsy stemming largely from the XXXXXX. This misalignment of the visual inputs, although not immediately perceptible to yourselves, results from the ischemic damage to the capillary vascular beds in the brain from the vaccine induced hypersensitivity response which ultimately has caused multiple areas of the brain (and other organ systems) to sustain hypoxic (lack of oxygen) delivery through the end arterial capillary beds. This MASS response, and ischemic process, is responsible for your son’s autistic features and inability to speak. The M.A.S.S. (Moulden Anoxia Spectra Syndrome) response to vaccination has also clipped the micro vascular capillary beds in other areas of the brain. This, in turn, has created your son’s inability to produce meaningful, fluent, speech., affected sensory processing, motor functions, and likely balance, coordination, and muscle tone. Please note that much of these adverse effects in terms of brain function is accounted by the term “disconnection syndromes.†Essentially, the connecting white matter tracts between various areas of the brain have been disconnected from their ultimate destination by virtue of the ischemic “MASS†process. This is called an expressive aphasia in neuropsychology. A variation of this phenomena is known as “isolation of speech syndrome†or ‘transcortical motor aphasia†if language comprehension and verbal repetition skills remain intact. Do note that despite your best efforts, expressive language functions, as well as varied neuromotor and sensory functions, will not recover until the body (and liver) is properly healed such that these vascular beds can re-form. These micro vascular end-artery beds are required for the white matter tracts to “plug-in†to the varied brain regions required to complete the circuits necessary for several functions that have been hampered for XXXXX, one of which is expressive language skills. Do note that micro vascular territories in the kidney have likely been adversely affected by the MASS response and this, in turn, may contribute to the inability to excrete various toxins and heavy metals without help (i.e. chelation). The MASS process affects not only the brain (autism), but also the liver, the kidneys, the bowel, the pancreas, and other organ systems. The is large variability between individuals as to the degree to which functional deficits in any particular organ system, including the brain, exists. Please note that the neurological damage XXXXXl suffered at 2 to 3 months of age, remained through 9 months of age, with a partial (albeit incomplete) recovery by twelve months of age. There appears to have been another significant ischemic MASS response that was further exacerbated by the 18 month period with further neurological compromise †" the effects of which remain to this day. Please note that microvascular territories that have been previously compromised by MASS renders the same tissue area uniquely susceptible to further “hits†when the MASS hypersensitivity response is re-activated by subsequent vaccinations and immune challenges. It appears that the MMR and Varivax vaccinations at 13 months of age triggered the MASS response again and this, in turn, has caused further damage to the micro vascular trees, and ultimately neurocognitive functions for XXXX. BrainGuardMD detects a significant change in neurological functioning in the transition from the 18 month to 20 month photos with marked flattening of facial animation, increasing asymmetry in facial architecture (once again the right brainstem being preferentially affected) photo at 20 months of age, including measures of neurological dysfunction that remain proprietary to BrainGuardMD.com. By 44 months, the neurological damage is readily apparent and once again this is most marked for the micro vascular territories of the right brainstem. These same areas were initially compromised at two months of age. Do note that the MASS response, upon repetitive environmental triggers by (vaccination, infectious disease, toxins etc..) or and/or residual vaccine adjutants (aluminum) and preservatives (mercury) will preferentially affect the tissue areas that have previously been compromised in terms of their breadth and redundancy of micro vascular arborization. It is for this reason that we see a cumulative and preferential decompensation in neurological functionality specific to the right brainstem as imaged using our BrainGuardMD technologies. Do note that this “Right Brainstem†area is simply a window to what is happening in clinically silent ways to other areas in the nervous system and body that have also had their micro vascular trees “clipped†by the “MASS†response to vaccination. Do note that the neurological damage we see has remained relatively constant between the photos from seven years of age up to the most recent photo at ten years of age. There has been some slight increase in the degree of ischemic damage to the right brainstem as detected in one of our BraingGuardMD.com measures over the past three years. The bottom line is this: although you may have been using and trying a multitude of “interventions†over the years †" Nothing you have done, to this point, has reversed the core neurological damage we can see that began as around two months of age. This is important information for you to have as it demonstrates that, despite good intentions, and funds yu have spent in good will, the interventions have used up to this point have not recovered the core neurological impediments that have been adversely affected by the MASS response †" to vaccination, in your child. You are dealing with a stroke rehabilitation individual in terms of your attempts to help XXXXX recover lost functionality and language skills. Anything that is accepted as beneficial in the stroke rehab literature will presumptively be helpful for XXXXX. Anything you have tried, supplements or otherwise, up until this point, has NOT reversed the core neurological damage we can now see and measure. BrainGuardMD.com and AMassNetwork.com Solutions We are interested in helping your child recover & measure this recovery with our Techniques: We are interested in moving forward with our intervention protocol with XXXXXl. Please note that this protocol involves out tailor making a solution for XXXXX specific to his physiology as we delineate from the blood work parameters we assess. And will require you to obtain. The protocol involves: 1) We require a current 30 second video clip of XXXXX tracking an object through extremes of horizontal and vertical gaze (looking left, looking right, looking up, looking down, smiling etc…). This can be uploaded to our BrainGuardMD.com site. 2) After we have this, we will quantify XXXXX current neurological functions based on our BrainGuardMD 12 measure of neurotypicality. These measures reflect the neurological damage XXXX has already sustained from vaccine injuries †" re: the ischemic stroke process. 3) We will need you to complete the medical history questionnaire we provide (lifestyle analysis). 4) We will have you complete the blood work we require at a lab in your area. 5) We will process the blood work. AFTER we have reviewed the blood work it is at this point we can definitively state whether or not we can provide an intervention for XXXXX that he can consume on a three times a day (30 minutes before meals) schedule. After twelve days we will need to repeat the blood work. We will be able to show you that the values are normalizing (these values normalize the same way for everyone †" as long as the intervention is tailored specific to the patient’s physiological needs as assessed by the blood work). If these values are not normalizing as we expect, then we shall reconstitute and start again. 6) After this second blood work is processed, we will re-constitute the next phase of intervention (herbal †" all approved as safe for human consumption) that continues to heal XXXXX’ hepatic functions which is necessary for healing the bone marrow, immune, and neurovascular anomalies that have emerged from the MASS response and vaccine injury. 7) We use repeat 30 second video clips to monitor the improvement in neurological function with our intervention so as to have quantifiable measures of the successful response to intervention that are neurological based reflecting the original neurological damage that XXXX has sustained from vaccination. 8) Do note that the older the vaccine injured person is, relative to the vaccine injury, the longer it takes for the body and physiology to heal. The bottom line is that healing does take place and we will be able to share this with you in terms of the normalizing metabolic values from the blood work as well as the neurological features we now have measured from BrainGuardMD. Additional Photos would be helpful for our baseline measured for your son: 1. Please send me a picture with XXXXX tilting his head to the right (30 degrees tilt and one with his right ear touching his right shoulder while looking direct at the camera). 2. Please send a 30 second video clip of your son wherein he is looking straight at the camera, tracking an object through visual space (i.e. have him follow your finger as he looks all the way ;left, all the way right a few times, as well as looking straight up towards the ceiling, and straight down towards the floor) Please feel free to call directly to discuss this report and our findings. I welcome addressing any questions you and your husband may have. There is hope. I recognize this information is rather disconcerting, Please bear in mind that the first step in solving any problem in clinical medicine is knowing what the problem is in physiology. With this knowledge, we are in a position to truly start helping XXXX by targeting interventions specific to the cause of his neurodevelopment challenges and vaccine injuries. Please note that if you have a newborn child, that we can now use BrainGuardMD to scan, pictures, and video, to identify the MASS response that will lead to sudden infant death (before the child stops breathing) and identify the MASS response (a medical emergency) that is actively causing silent brain damage in the here and now that will later be diagnosed as autism, learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, infantile paralysis, adverse vaccine reaction, or sudden death. Kind regards, J. Moulden BA, MA, M.D., Ph.D. President & CEO CNAPS Medical devices Inc. 1-705-498-6284 In response to this post by Kay: > > When I am making a decision to try something new for my son I look > at many different factors. Some of these may include: > > 1. Is there research reports and published scientific evidence to > support the product/theory?? There is certain scientific evidence > for autism and mercury poisoning in the literature. > > 2. Is there approval by FDA or other government regulatory > bodies? (DMSA for example is approved by FDA for metal removal) > > 3. Is there input from relevant specialists and professionals whom > have expertise and whose opinions may validate research findings?? > (Andy would be considered an expert on chelation and there are other > MD's whom support it as well and are considered experts-so therefore > there are multiple experts that support chelation for autism) > > 4. Lastly, would look at antidotal patient/parent information from > using the product. There are many parents on this site alone that > have seen improvements or recovery from chelation. There are also > other sites dedicated to recovery by chelation (as well as diet and > supplements). > > > So Dr Moulden it looks like you have quite a bit of work to do!! > Andy has already done lots of work and his work meets my standards!! > > > Kay > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.