Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 [Editors note: This is to introduce a paper " A Methodology to Analyse the Intersections of Social Inequalities in Health " (Gita Sen, Aditi Iyer, Chandan Mukherjeec 2009) This study may provide much needed insights into issues related to access to treatment for women living with HIV in India. According to the findings of this study, in the case of non-treatment and discontinuation of treatment has gender and class implications. Treatment versus non-treatment is strongly governed by gender bias, with all women being affected by it, while class differences at this level only operate to distinguish the poorest women from non-poor women. The poorest women and even poor women remain at the bottom. However, poor men are able to hold on to their gender advantage, are not as badly affected by discontinuation, and are significantly better off than poor women. While applying the finding of this study to understand access to treatment for people living with HIV, it appears that there may be a gender bias in access to ARV treatment in India. One of the policy challenge of NACP IV may be to address gender bias in access to ARV treatment] _____________________________________ A Methodology to Analyse the Intersections of Social Inequalities in Health Gita Sen a; Aditi Iyer b; Chandan Mukherjee c a Centre for Public Policy, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore , India b Indian Institute of Management , Bangalore , India c Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum , India DOI: 10.1080/19452820903048894 - URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452820903048894 Journal of Human Development and Capabilities - Volume 10, Issue 3 November 2009 , pages 397 - 415 Abstract An important issue for health policy and planning is the way in which multiple sources of disadvantage, such as class, gender, caste, race, ethnicity, and so forth, work together to influence health. Although 'intersectionality' is a topic for which there is growing interest and evidence, several questions as yet remain unanswered. These gaps partly reflect limitations in the quantitative methods used to study intersectionality in health, even though the techniques used to analyse health inequalities as separable processes can be sophisticated. In this paper, we discuss a method we developed to analyse the intersections between different social inequalities, including a technique to test for differences along the entire span of the social spectrum, not just between the extremes. We show how this method can be applied to the analysis of intersectionality in access to healthcare, using cross-sectional data in Koppal, one of the poorest districts in Karnataka , India. In addition to the obvious benefit of deepening our insights into social inequalities and how they interact, the study of intersectionality using our approach has the potential to provide critical guidance for policies and programmes. By giving precise insights into who is affected and how in different settings, it provides a scalpel for policies rather than the current hatchet. It enables policies and programmes to identify whom to focus on, whom to protect, what exactly to promote and why. It also provides a simple way to monitor and evaluate the impact of policies and programmes on different sub-groups from the most disadvantaged through the middle layers to those with particular advantages. View Full Text Article: PDF [20p.] at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ftinterface~content=a913310624~fulltext=7132409\ 30~frm=content Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.