was: Cell Food - now: mercury in seaweed

[Guest guest]

It could be a problem unless the seaweed is tested.

> > > I waited a couple days to send this, because I have been trying (and

> > > will continue to try) to get a firsthand look at testing results

> > that

> > > back up what they say here.

> >

> > Send it to the lab you use for your own products, so you can have test

> > results presumably from a lab you trust, and you don't have to " try "

> > to get the results.

> >

> > > What Mark told me is that Cell Food is derived from sea water and

> > > sea vegetation, and therefore contains all elements that occur in

> > > nature.

> >

> > Does this include the mercury that I am always reading is so prevalent

> > in ocean plants and animals?

> >

> > >>Lumina has discovered that these 2 elements we asked about

> > > (which do not occur in nature) were included in their list by

> > mistake

> > > over twenty years ago, and is therefore changing the official Cell

> > > Food ingredient list to reflect that it does not contain these

> > > elements.

> >

> > Presumably he will be testing it first, to be sure it really does NOT

> > contain those elements?

> >

> > And, he sells a product that he does not even bother to verify the

> > ingredient list? This makes me think he does not really know what is

> > in it, nor does he care.

> >

> > > I want to state very clearly that we at BrainChild continue to

> > believe

> > > that Cell Food is a safe and useful tool for oxygenating the gut,

> > > shifting pH and detox support.

> >

> > What info do you have, that leads you to believe this? I think that

> > would be good for parents to know.

> >

> > > I just completed my conference with Mr. Negrete, president

> > > of NuScience Coporation (www.nuscience.com), manufacturers of

> > > Cellfood.

> >

> > So Cell Food is manufactured by NuScience, who sells it to Lumina, who

> > sells it to BrainChild, who sells it to the ultimate user?

> >

> > > we have therefore discovered that they have been mistakenly

> > listed as

> > > Cellfood ingredients for many years. And we believe we've discovered

> > > why this error was originally made many years ago:

> >

> > Time to re-test the product, to see what is actually in there today.

> > The ocean is becoming more and more polluted.

> >

> > >>Apparently when the

> > > original list of Cellfood ingredients was made several decades ago,

> > > technetium and promethium were assumed to be present by a Cellfood

> > > documentation officer who did not realize that they were not

> > naturally

> > > occurring.

> >

> > So the list of ingredients was " compiled by assumption " of everything

> > that is naturally occurring, not necessarily what was actually in the

> > product?

> >

> > > Therefore, we are now updating our ingredients list to reflect this

> > > correction.

> >

> > A new test to determine actual ingredients would dispel claims of

> > false advertising.

> >

> > > Here are a few links that relate to this common mistake:

> >

> > False advertising, and compiling an ingredient list of things " that we

> > think should be there " is a common mistake?

> >

> > > As for Mr. Cutler's second observation, however, Cellfood does not

> > > contain lead, which is removed by the same technology used by the

> > U.S.

> > > military.

> >

> > Is this just a guess also? Or was it actually tested?

> >

> > > If he is saying that lead is a byproduct of actinium, polonium or

> > > thorium � " and therefore must be present if there 3 elements are

> > > present � " then he may be right, but please realize that all green

> > > plants will contain all of these naturally occurring elements in

> > > 'parts per billion' amounts that are perfectly safe.

> >

> > Anyone who says something is " perfectly safe " , does not know much

> > about autism.

> >

> > > 1. Cellfood's LD50 industry-standard test shows that an adult can

> > > consume 40 full bottles of Cellfood with no harmful toxic result.

> >

> > Please make this test publicly available, so that people who know how

> > to read it, can comment.

> >

> > > 2. In the 39 years of Cellfood's distribution to (now) over 70

> > > countries, no adverse reaction report has ever been filed worldwide.

> >

> > I am suspicious of this statement, for many reasons.

> >

> > Dana

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>