Guest guest Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 Hi, this is on behalf of a friend of mine. She tested her 9yo son and we would need help on interpreting his results. His test is loaded in files section -> Hair tests -> hair elements_Stas.PDF ( http://f1.grp.fs.com/v1/oNVPSZjYMpON- Y8oh1O4mJQSYokqzRsNh0bNvOQphNU0QkocRKeDwtgzFbkqWNAClz9bG5RXBRJCiPzQoJD O9PxLSDys48RUKw/HairTests/hair%20elements_Stas.PDF ) I tried to apply counting rules and the test is definitely meeting at least two of them. So his mineral transport is really bad. I presume we can't judge about metal levels by this test, only that he is heavily poisoned. He has high sodium and potassium together with low calcium and magnesium indicating adrenal problems. Any more inputs, please? Now the other question. She did challenge test on 26.06.08 with DMPS suppositories. His 24 hours urine toxic metals test showed 2.0 mcg/mg creatinine (ref.range <5) while the same test before challenge showed nothing. They did not do any more challenges or chelation after that. But three months later his urine test (15.10.08) still showed exactly the same mercury level (2.0 mcg/mg) and his blood test (23.09.08) showed mercury as well. We are completely baffled with these results. Is it possible that mercury would stay in blood for so long after the challenge test? Why does his urine test still show mercury? She got checked her house, water supply and the school – no mercury sources. No amalgam fillings. No fish. And remember, he showed no mercury before challenge test. Any ideas? Thanks, Galina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 Not Andy here but will respond anyway. Challenge tests are dangerous (because of the high single dose) and not particulary useful. Please, please ask that she not do any more. Did he get the flu shot? Most versions of it still contain mercury. S S Need help with test results - Andy, please Posted by: " nikitasmom33 " nikitasmom33@... nikitasmom33 Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:52 am (PST) Hi, this is on behalf of a friend of mine. She tested her 9yo son and we would need help on interpreting his results. His test is loaded in files section -> Hair tests -> hair elements_Stas.PDF ( http://f1.grp.fs.com/v1/oNVPSZjYMpON- Y8oh1O4mJQSYokqzRsNh0bNvOQphNU0QkocRKeDwtgzFbkqWNAClz9bG5RXBRJCiPzQoJD O9PxLSDys48RUKw/HairTests/hair%20elements_Stas.PDF ) I tried to apply counting rules and the test is definitely meeting at least two of them. So his mineral transport is really bad. I presume we can't judge about metal levels by this test, only that he is heavily poisoned. He has high sodium and potassium together with low calcium and magnesium indicating adrenal problems. Any more inputs, please? Now the other question. She did challenge test on 26.06.08 with DMPS suppositories. His 24 hours urine toxic metals test showed 2.0 mcg/mg creatinine (ref.range <5) while the same test before challenge showed nothing. They did not do any more challenges or chelation after that. But three months later his urine test (15.10.08) still showed exactly the same mercury level (2.0 mcg/mg) and his blood test (23.09.08) showed mercury as well. We are completely baffled with these results. Is it possible that mercury would stay in blood for so long after the challenge test? Why does his urine test still show mercury? She got checked her house, water supply and the school – no mercury sources. No amalgam fillings. No fish. And remember, he showed no mercury before challenge test. Any ideas? Thanks, Galina ------------------------------------------------------------ Fashion Design Education Career Problems? Get a Fashion Design Education. Click Now. http://tagline.excite.com/fc/BK72PcZbqeW4MDfksuwE3TYVsX1FQqmT6Sa7ZWAuH1hx6JznYa6\ Djq/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 > > > Not Andy here but will respond anyway. Challenge tests are dangerous (because of the high single dose) and not particulary useful. > S S Well, she knows it now. So the problem now is about interpreting the tests. But it seems eveyone has gone dor Christmas holiday > > Need help with test results - Andy, please > Posted by: " nikitasmom33 " nikitasmom33@... nikitasmom33 > Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:52 am (PST) > Hi, this is on behalf of a friend of mine. She tested her 9yo son and > we would need help on interpreting his results. > His test is loaded in files section -> Hair tests -> hair > elements_Stas.PDF ( http://f1.grp.fs.com/v1/oNVPSZjYMpON- > Y8oh1O4mJQSYokqzRsNh0bNvOQphNU0QkocRKeDwtgzFbkqWNAClz9bG5RXBRJCiPzQoJD > O9PxLSDys48RUKw/HairTests/hair%20elements_Stas.PDF ) > > I tried to apply counting rules and the test is definitely meeting at > least two of them. So his mineral transport is really bad. I presume > we can't judge about metal levels by this test, only that he is > heavily poisoned. He has high sodium and potassium together with low > calcium and magnesium indicating adrenal problems. Any more inputs, > please? > Now the other question. She did challenge test on 26.06.08 with DMPS > suppositories. His 24 hours urine toxic metals test showed 2.0 mcg/mg > creatinine (ref.range <5) while the same test before challenge showed > nothing. They did not do any more challenges or chelation after that. > But three months later his urine test (15.10.08) still showed exactly > the same mercury level (2.0 mcg/mg) and his blood test (23.09.08) > showed mercury as well. > We are completely baffled with these results. Is it possible that > mercury would stay in blood for so long after the challenge test? Why > does his urine test still show mercury? She got checked her house, > water supply and the school †" no mercury sources. No amalgam > fillings. No fish. And remember, he showed no mercury before > challenge test. Any ideas? > Thanks, > Galina > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Fashion Design Education > Career Problems? Get a Fashion Design Education. Click Now. > http://tagline.excite.com/fc/BK72PcZbqeW4MDfksuwE3TYVsX1FQqmT6Sa7ZWAuH 1hx6JznYa6Djq/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 I will try to answer questions in the post and interpret the test for you...some of us are never on holiday..LOL... > > > > Need help with test results - Andy, please > > Posted by: " nikitasmom33 " nikitasmom33@ nikitasmom33 > > Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:52 am (PST) > > Hi, this is on behalf of a friend of mine. She tested her 9yo son > and we would need help on interpreting his results. I tried to apply counting rules and the test is definitely meeting at least two of them. So his mineral transport is really bad. I presume we can't judge about metal levels by this test, only that he is heavily poisoned. He has high sodium and potassium together with low calcium and magnesium indicating adrenal problems. Any more inputs, please? {{{ This test meets counting rule for mercury. He has mercury toxicity. His lead, aluminum, antimony are also high. Find and reduce sources of all these metals. The aluminum and antimony are likely from the mercury. Because this test meets rules, the levels of essentials may not be accurate body indicators, so you can't rely on them to indicate deficiencies. Potassium/Sodium up with cal/mag down means the adrenals are not making enough cortisol or adrenaline and their thyroid is somewhat low. I would recommend zinc and calcium because of the lead levels. The zinc/cadmium ratio is not relevant in the presence of deranged minerals. I'd say it's official that this child is heavy metal toxic and chelation with dmsa/ala on Andy's protocl would benefit. Adrenal support and look at testing TSH, free t3, and free t4, and thyroid antibiodies if they see signs associated with thyroid problems or there is a family history.}}} Now the other question. She did challenge test on 26.06.08 with DMPS suppositories. His 24 hours urine toxic metals test showed 2.0 mcg/mg creatinine (ref.range <5) while the same test before challenge showed nothing. {{Did it show any metals? Creatinine? I'm not sure how that pertains to his toxicity. No more challenges test please.}} They did not do any more challenges or chelation after that. But three months later his urine test (15.10.08) still showed exactly the same mercury level (2.0 mcg/mg) and his blood test (23.09.08) showed mercury as well. {{yep, levels can stay up for a quite a while after moving mercury. This is what makes the challenge test dangerous.}} We are completely baffled with these results. Is it possible that mercury would stay in blood for so long after the challenge test? {{ Possibly, when you move mercury around blood levels can go up for anywhere from 3-18 months after wards.}} Why does his urine test still show mercury? She got checked her house, water supply and the school, no mercury sources. No amalgam fillings. No fish. And remember, he showed no mercury before challenge test. {{ not uncommon, as it was in deep stores in the body, such as organs and central nervous system. This would not be coming out in his urine or blood without using a chelator.}} {{{No vaccines? Where do they live, many of us have mercury in the air because of the power plants and industry. Others have it from vaccination as infants. I also find it hard to believe their water is mercury free, unless they are buying spring water or using a filter. If so, then maybe it is. It's possible that all this was stirred up by giving a chelator for the challenge test. It can be fixed by doing proper low dose oral chelation on Andy's protocol. it means he's toxic with mercury though. }} Hope that helps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Many thanks for that! Yes, he certainly got his mercury from vaccines, no doubt. She was worried about the test because this mercury in his urine could indicate some unknown current source of mercury. In this case she could not start any chelation. But if mercury can still show in three months after provocation than everything is clear. Now she can think about proper chelation. Thanks again Galina > > I will try to answer questions in the post and interpret the test for > you...some of us are never on holiday..LOL... > > > > > > Need help with test results - Andy, please > > > Posted by: " nikitasmom33 " nikitasmom33@ nikitasmom33 > > > Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:52 am (PST) > > > Hi, this is on behalf of a friend of mine. She tested her 9yo son > > and we would need help on interpreting his results. > I tried to apply counting rules and the test is definitely meeting at > least two of them. So his mineral transport is really bad. I presume > we can't judge about metal levels by this test, only that he is > heavily poisoned. He has high sodium and potassium together with low > calcium and magnesium indicating adrenal problems. Any more inputs, > please? > > {{{ This test meets counting rule for mercury. He has mercury > toxicity. His lead, aluminum, antimony are also high. Find and reduce > sources of all these metals. The aluminum and antimony are likely from > the mercury. Because this test meets rules, the levels of essentials > may not be accurate body indicators, so you can't rely on them to > indicate deficiencies. > Potassium/Sodium up with cal/mag down means the adrenals are not > making enough cortisol or adrenaline and their thyroid is somewhat > low. I would recommend zinc and calcium because of the lead levels. > The zinc/cadmium ratio is not relevant in the presence of deranged > minerals. > I'd say it's official that this child is heavy metal toxic and > chelation with dmsa/ala on Andy's protocl would benefit. Adrenal > support and look at testing TSH, free t3, and free t4, and thyroid > antibiodies if they see signs associated with thyroid problems or > there is a family history.}}} > > > Now the other question. She did challenge test on 26.06.08 with > DMPS suppositories. His 24 hours urine toxic metals test showed 2.0 > mcg/mg creatinine (ref.range <5) while the same test before challenge > showed nothing. > > > {{Did it show any metals? Creatinine? I'm not sure how that pertains > to his toxicity. No more challenges test please.}} > > They did not do any more challenges or chelation after > that. But three months later his urine test (15.10.08) still showed > exactly the same mercury level (2.0 mcg/mg) and his blood test > (23.09.08) showed mercury as well. > > > {{yep, levels can stay up for a quite a while after moving mercury. > This is what makes the challenge test dangerous.}} > > We are completely baffled with these results. Is it possible that > mercury would stay in blood for so long after the challenge test? > > {{ Possibly, when you move mercury around blood levels can go up for > anywhere from 3-18 months after wards.}} > > > Why does his urine test still show mercury? She got checked her house, > water supply and the school, no mercury sources. No amalgam > fillings. No fish. And remember, he showed no mercury before > challenge test. > > {{ not uncommon, as it was in deep stores in the body, such as organs > and central nervous system. This would not be coming out in his urine > or blood without using a chelator.}} > > {{{No vaccines? Where do they live, many of us have mercury in the air > because of the power plants and industry. Others have it from > vaccination as infants. I also find it hard to believe their water is > mercury free, unless they are buying spring water or using a filter. > If so, then maybe it is. It's possible that all this was stirred up by > giving a chelator for the challenge test. It can be fixed by doing > proper low dose oral chelation on Andy's protocol. it means he's toxic > with mercury though. }} > Hope that helps! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Even if it were recently she can still start dmsa only or dmps which would lower the blood levels. -- In , " nikitasmom33 " <nikitasmom33@...> wrote: > > Many thanks for that! > Yes, he certainly got his mercury from vaccines, no doubt. She was > worried about the test because this mercury in his urine could > indicate some unknown current source of mercury. In this case she > could not start any chelation. But if mercury can still show in three > months after provocation than everything is clear. Now she can think > about proper chelation. > Thanks again > Galina > > > > > > > I will try to answer questions in the post and interpret the test > for > > you...some of us are never on holiday..LOL... > > > > > > > > Need help with test results - Andy, please > > > > Posted by: " nikitasmom33 " nikitasmom33@ nikitasmom33 > > > > Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:52 am (PST) > > > > Hi, this is on behalf of a friend of mine. She tested her 9yo > son > > > and we would need help on interpreting his results. > > I tried to apply counting rules and the test is definitely meeting > at > > least two of them. So his mineral transport is really bad. I presume > > we can't judge about metal levels by this test, only that he is > > heavily poisoned. He has high sodium and potassium together with low > > calcium and magnesium indicating adrenal problems. Any more inputs, > > please? > > > > {{{ This test meets counting rule for mercury. He has mercury > > toxicity. His lead, aluminum, antimony are also high. Find and > reduce > > sources of all these metals. The aluminum and antimony are likely > from > > the mercury. Because this test meets rules, the levels of essentials > > may not be accurate body indicators, so you can't rely on them to > > indicate deficiencies. > > Potassium/Sodium up with cal/mag down means the adrenals are not > > making enough cortisol or adrenaline and their thyroid is somewhat > > low. I would recommend zinc and calcium because of the lead levels. > > The zinc/cadmium ratio is not relevant in the presence of deranged > > minerals. > > I'd say it's official that this child is heavy metal toxic and > > chelation with dmsa/ala on Andy's protocl would benefit. Adrenal > > support and look at testing TSH, free t3, and free t4, and thyroid > > antibiodies if they see signs associated with thyroid problems or > > there is a family history.}}} > > > > > > Now the other question. She did challenge test on 26.06.08 with > > DMPS suppositories. His 24 hours urine toxic metals test showed 2.0 > > mcg/mg creatinine (ref.range <5) while the same test before > challenge > > showed nothing. > > > > > > {{Did it show any metals? Creatinine? I'm not sure how that pertains > > to his toxicity. No more challenges test please.}} > > > > They did not do any more challenges or chelation after > > that. But three months later his urine test (15.10.08) still showed > > exactly the same mercury level (2.0 mcg/mg) and his blood test > > (23.09.08) showed mercury as well. > > > > > > {{yep, levels can stay up for a quite a while after moving mercury. > > This is what makes the challenge test dangerous.}} > > > > We are completely baffled with these results. Is it possible that > > mercury would stay in blood for so long after the challenge test? > > > > {{ Possibly, when you move mercury around blood levels can go up for > > anywhere from 3-18 months after wards.}} > > > > > > Why does his urine test still show mercury? She got checked her > house, > > water supply and the school, no mercury sources. No amalgam > > fillings. No fish. And remember, he showed no mercury before > > challenge test. > > > > {{ not uncommon, as it was in deep stores in the body, such as > organs > > and central nervous system. This would not be coming out in his > urine > > or blood without using a chelator.}} > > > > {{{No vaccines? Where do they live, many of us have mercury in the > air > > because of the power plants and industry. Others have it from > > vaccination as infants. I also find it hard to believe their water > is > > mercury free, unless they are buying spring water or using a filter. > > If so, then maybe it is. It's possible that all this was stirred up > by > > giving a chelator for the challenge test. It can be fixed by doing > > proper low dose oral chelation on Andy's protocol. it means he's > toxic > > with mercury though. }} > > Hope that helps! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.