Guest guest Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/10699 Many of my patients had similar experiences and I wrote them earlier too Since it has come from proverbial horse's mouth, may be the attitudes will change for the better and autorities who matter will look into it. Otherwise also Dr.Rewari is a great listener--do not loose heart Margadarshini and do justify your name by showing the direction (Margdarshini means one who shows the path---am I right) Cheer up Dr.Bharti -- Rakesh Bharti MD,AAHIVS, BDC Research center, 27-D,Sant Avenue,The Mall,Amritsar. Punjab,INDIA143001. TEl-91-183-2277822;91-183-2278522 e-mail: <rakesh.bharti1@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2009 Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 Dear All Forum Members Re: /message/10699 I have gone through the case. Though it is not correct to comment on the treatment given without seeing patient and his records, it appears that starting ART at 259 CD4 was correct. It is not clear what was the time gap between starting ART and repeat CD4 done at Hospital. The CD4 count could have been increased to 500 as patient was started on it ART. Any way the ART should not have been stopped by MO at hospital and he must know the latest guidelines by NACO are 250 and not 200. I request to concerned person to send me a confidential email at my email id so that we can ask the concerned doctor that why treatment was stopped & correct advice was not given. I am also taking up the issue with the nodal officer of ART at hospital. Thanks Dr B.B.Rewari MD,FICP,FIACM,FIMSA,FGSI Sr.Physician,Dr RML Hospital & National Programme Officer (ART) National AIDS Control Organistion, 6th Floor, Chandralok Building, 36, Janpath, New Delhi-110001 Tel; 011-23731954, 43509999(O) Mobile ; 91-9811267610 Fax : 011-23731954,23731746 e-mail: <drbbrewari@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Dear Forum, Re: /message/10699 I have noticed that there are many ART centers like the one at Tumkur, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child health etc where the ART officers do call up and discuss the condition of their patient before they make a decision on treatment. They are also accessible to others by phone. However there is the other extreme where ART medical officers and all the others at the ART unit just refuse to cooperate with NGOs. They fail to realize that the ART program is just one of the many government run public health programs. So instead of treating everybody else in the field as competitors, the ART officers should start looking at net-working and associating with others in the field. If they do this, they will also realize that there is a lot more that can be achieved towards actually helping the PLHA. It would also be wise for doctors to remember that every public health program finally caters to " the individual " . We also need to remember that in a democratic country, people have the right to choose where they want to seek treatment These are my views. Dr. Nirmala Rajagopalan Freedom Foundation e-mail: <drnirmala@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Dear All, Re: /message/10699 Let us see this issue it in different perspectives not see it as reason to blame each other (which is the easiest response possible): It is unfortunate that a patient get an advice to stop ART from a government ART center.It should not happen at all. But an ART MO who had training in ART guidelines -- thinks s/he does not have the mandate to initiate ART for an individual who is started with ART outside the guideline given to him.--initial CD4 was done outside NACO, and current one is 500. A typical response will be to follow the guideline and be safe. As a program it is important to have some strict guidelines and regulations in a public health program and any practitioners and managers consider guidelines as inflexible rules. Same time too much flexibility in guidelines can lead to anarchy. (Probably) except for ART program all public health programs aim at the community and not on individuals. Hence many guidelines applied in public health programs are suboptimal for individual patient care. There are examples for this in leprosy and HIV programs. But the care delivery in these programs -especially HIV-program is highly individualized and personalised. There exists a conflict between community oriented program management and individualized health care delivery. I personally see this kind of problems as a result of this conflict and we should take this as an opportunity to develop an optimal health care delivery modal for the future. (HIV is not just a crisis but an opportunity too) I agree partially with Ms Nirmala Rajagopalan that there is lack of understanding between various stake holders. This happens even inside the same organization. It is important to sensitize the roles , duties and limitations of each component of HIV response to the rest. The lack communication happens not only between ART MOs and NGOs , between managers and patients, between different NGOs,different arms of same organization. what is the solution? Vigilance and regular feed back , respect to the rest of the partners in response, devolving comradeship between the stake holders, updating of training modules, developing mechanism to clear the practical issues from the field, frequent updating of guidelines .... Let us continue to do these. I hope NACO will soon include a section which can be a quick reference to usual practical problems encountered by ART team during their work especially on real life situations which are not easy to be solved by an young and new team member as part of the guidelines. I am sure ART team of NACO will teak it up. I thank Margadarsi team for raising this issue, we should have a system where such problems are problems of both program managers, doctors, patients and NGOs. It is unfortunate that patients feel doctor can be potential threat to patient and doctors see patients as potential threats! With best wishes Dr Ajithkumar.K -- Dr Ajithkumar.K Asst Professor In Dermatology and Veneriology Medical college Chest Hospital MG Kav,Trichur, Kerala ,India Ph 04872333322 (res) 9447226012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.