Re: How many decades ILO, NACO and ESIC need to Implement Tripartite Agreement?

[Guest guest]

Dear Snehanshu,

Re: /message/11399

There you are! And people on the forum are claiming HIV programme in India grand

success and a model to be followed by other programmes!

I think HIV programme in India need a scrutiny by an independent agency/panel.

Only then we shall know the patronising gang of NACO, UN bodies, Bilaterals and

Foundations and even GFATM have played a game to tame people, silence them, buy

genuine people over, kill CSOs and ignore voices which talk of discipline, and

transparency and accountability.

ILOs is no exception. Just randon check any agency that has been " supported " by

the gang.

Monies laundered, paper presented in Int conferences, training held in exotic

places, beautiful elegant publications done and visitors awarded and that's it.

Let us have an accountability conference of the monies and efforts put in by UN

bodies, Bilaterals and Foundations and NACO looked at by an independent panel?

Let us ask for some transparency.

Let us see some non jargon realistic, honest, open talk?

Thanks

Dr Sanjeev Kumar

New Delhi India

e-mai: <sanjeevbcc@...>

[Guest guest]

Dear forum,

Re: /message/11404

Guidelines of care centres also are very stringent on mandatory referring.

NACO funded care centres are supposed to be 'Referral centres', not

'Comprehensive care centres', making PLHA running from " Pillar to Post " is a

mandate according to guidelines.

PLHA need to be saved from this spider web of running from place to place, but

gets no where.

 

Madhuri

e-mail: <madhurikv_99@...>