what's affront in changing a subject line? // was: Re: Vote For McCain-Palin

[Guest guest]

> ===>Not on this list, I got called a " liar " by the moderator for

changing the post heading. That's a no no here.

I called you a liar because you attributed a " direct quote " to me but

you had changed my words. This was in the middle of the message, not

the subject header.

> Salespeople are allowed to continually spew their mistruths and

unvalidated claims, but I'm the liar.

I don't moderate/remove/ban list members for posting messages that I

don't agree with. I believe the other list members will be good to

point out any information/opinions/etc that they disagree with. It is

a self-correcting list, in that respect.

People can feel free to post occasional mistruths, unvalidated claims,

and lies, and I won't ban them, unless it is " persistent " . I don't

think it serves the list to be quick with the " ban " key.

You can continue to hold it against me, or not. I take nothing

personally here, and I am not one to hold grudges. In fact, I thought

we were past this, but apparently not. You have a lot of good

information that you share here, and several of your ideas have been

good for my kids. I don't consider a single disagreement on a

personal level, as cause for action as a moderator.

Dana