Guest guest Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Andy, I have posted a few different messages on the above topics and am somewhat confused by varying answers that I have received, so I am seeking your input for clarification. By way of background we have been chelating per your protocol for a little over 4 months now, first with DMSA alone and now, for a couple of rounds with DMSA and ALA for about 5 rounds. We do the 3 days on, 4 days off schedule. We did a hair test before starting chelation about 6 months ago which I posted then. Our DAN! wanted to do a follow up hair test after some months of chelation which we did recently. We received the results a week or so ago, which I have yet to post. A few things were obvious to us without even posting the results from our reading of your books: Adrenal fatigue has become very pronounced, with very low potassium and sodium. (both are green into yellow - sodium is 13, with a reference range of 20 - 200, and potassium is 8, with a reference range of 12 - 200) This was also evident 6 months ago, but we did not want to try the ACE at the time and were hopeful that chelation might address the adrenal issues. Rather than help, chelation has made things worse. We have been noticing bad sea salt cravings with our son lately and other behaviors. We started the ACE and this seems to have helped tremendously. 1. Is there anything else we should be doing? Copper was high 6 months ago, not quite in the red but close. We had been giving lots of nuts and other high copper foods, which we thought was the cause, so we stopped giving these foods. However, now in the new hair test, copper is literally as high as it can go, to the end of the page, (copper is 79 with a reference range of 11 - 18) so we started the copper protocol, molybdenum, additional zinc, milk thistle and liver support in the form of Liver Life, multiple times a day and absolutely no copper foods. We continue to chelate with very low dose ALA (3 mg per dose) and DMSA (10mg per dose). Our DAN! says we can be getting a false reading if we have copper pipes and wash our son's hair in the water from the faucet. I thought this seemed too easy an answer. 2. I have been getting conflicting answers and am confused by what I read in the archives. Is it okay to continue to chelate with ALA when copper is this high as long as we address it with the proper copper protocol? Also, we give about 100 mcg of molybdenum 3 times a day, do we need to give more? Six months ago when I posted his hair test, various group members told me that our son (who is 3 by the way) was " wasting " zinc (very high zinc in the hair - we supplement with about 55 mg throughout the day, but often he seems to need more or we see lots of chewing type behaviors) Many advised supplementing with B6 to help with this problem. However, he could not tolerate the B6. So with this hair test with have the same situation and the same high level of zinc in the hair, not quite in the red, but close. Now after some months of chelation, he is now able to tolerate B6, so hopefully this will address the zinc wasting. 3. Will increasing zinc absorption help with lowering copper? I cannot seem to get a straight answer on this. One of my main concerns is calcium and boron on his hair test. His calcium is high, 528, with a reference range of 125 - 370) and boron has fallen extremely low, lower than his last hair test.( .44, with a reference range of .70 - 5.0) Our son is strictly casein free and we were giving him 250 mg per day of Kirkman calcium powder with vitamin D. 4. Can this high calcium contribute to the high copper levels as well? We stopped giving calcium after the new hair test came in, in large part due to Dana's answer to my post asking about calcium, stating that my son might in fact be calcium " toxic " and have free floating calcium in the body - that he might not be absorbing or properly utilizing the calcium we were supplementing, along with the calcium in his fortified rice milk (which accounts for another 500 mg or so). Also, I seem to recall reading in your books about calcium causing copper retention. We suspended the calcium supplement for one week, and our son was very calm. My husband insisted I reintroduce it, and he became very hyper again. 5. Is this reaction to the calcium supplement a likely indication that he is calcium " toxic " ? It is hard for me to grasp how this is possible when he is completely casein free. Dana recommended using IP6 to demineralize, and rid the body of excess calcium, and to reintroduce calcium thereafter along with magnesium (which we were doing anyway) and vitamin K for better absorption. We were worried about a vitamin K deficiency anyway, as he bruises easily and has chronic diarrhea (There is a lot of Crohn's in the family and other bowel conditions as well) 6. In your opinion, is IP6 generally safe and effective to use, and does it make sense to do so in light of the seeming problems with his calcium supplement? If so, how much should one give a 30 lb child? How long do you use it? How can you tell when it has done its job? And if it demineralizes, can it be used while chelating with DMSA? Would we need to give additional minerals, or use it only off round? I was confused a bit by what I have read about this. 7. And when would one reintroduce calcium? My concern is he is getting no calcium at all without it on his very restricted diet, other than whatever form is in his rice milk. How much vitamin K2 should be given with the calcium when it is reintroduced? should it be given simultaneously with calcium and mag when reintroduced? As to the extremely low boron, I thought that this might have to do with the whole calcium/vitamin D absorption issue, and would affect bone density. 8. Am I correct in this assumption? Our son gets vitamin D2 the synthetic form in his rice milk, not optimal I understand. Otherwise he gets CLO, with fairly high vitamin A, but very low vitamin D, so we started giving additional vitamin D3, as I understand there is a synergistic relationship between the two, with too much of one depleting the other (you in fact answered my post on this point) Will this help with the low boron? Or does one need to supplement boron directly? Also, his latest hair tests shows lithium is very low. (.005 with a reference range of .007 - ..020), in the yellow approaching the red. I have not been able to get a handle based on the posts on this, as to whether it is necessary to supplement with this, or if this is just a symptom of mercury toxicity. Our son is generally even tempered although lately we are getting more oppositional behavior, and less even tempered behavior, but we do not know if it is related to this, or perhaps yeast, or just being a 3 year old as well. 9. At what levels should lithium be supplemented? And if so, is it the lithium orotate form? How much should be given to start? Or will chelation rectify this eventually? I would appreciate it if you would answers these questions for me, for purposes of clarification. Thanks. Irene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 > Adrenal fatigue has become very pronounced, with very low potassium and sodium. (both > are green into yellow - sodium is 13, with a reference range of 20 - 200, and potassium is > 8, with a reference range of 12 - 200) This was also evident 6 months ago, but we did not > want to try the ACE at the time and were hopeful that chelation might address the adrenal > issues. There is no reason to wait on this. >Rather than help, chelation has made things worse. We have been noticing bad sea > salt cravings with our son lately and other behaviors. We started the ACE and this seems > to have helped tremendously. > > 1. Is there anything else we should be doing? Use more adrenal cortex. Let him have salt if he wants it. > (copper is 79 with a reference range of 11 - 18) so we started the > copper protocol, molybdenum, additional zinc, milk thistle and liver support in the form > of Liver Life, multiple times a day and absolutely no copper foods. We continue to chelate > with very low dose ALA (3 mg per dose) and DMSA (10mg per dose). O > Is it okay to continue to chelate with ALA when copper is this high as long as we address it > with the proper copper protocol? Yes. >Also, we give about 100 mcg of molybdenum 3 times a > day, do we need to give more? Yes. 1,000 mcg 1-3 times a day. > 3. Will increasing zinc absorption help with lowering copper? No. > One of my main concerns is calcium and boron on his hair test. His calcium is high, 528, > with a reference range of 125 - 370) and boron has fallen extremely low, lower than his > last hair test.( .44, with a reference range of .70 - 5.0) Our son is strictly casein free and > we were giving him 250 mg per day of Kirkman calcium powder with vitamin D. > > 4. Can this high calcium contribute to the high copper levels as well? No. > We stopped giving calcium after the new hair test came in, in large part due to Dana's > answer to my post Dana is a very nice, decent and well meaning person, but I really do suggest people ignore what she has to say. > . We suspended the calcium > supplement for one week, and our son was very calm. My husband insisted I reintroduce > it, and he became very hyper again. Why do you need a lot of pseudoscientific babbling and rationalization here? It's obvious the stuff isn't good for him so don't use it. If you want to, try some other kinds of Ca supplements. If he responds poorly, don't bother with them. > 7. And when would one reintroduce calcium? My concern is he is getting no calcium at all > without it on his very restricted diet, other than whatever form is in his rice milk. Billions of people have grown up to be strong and healthy without drinking any milk. In fact, they eat their rice rather than drink it. They're chinese and japanese. Neither place has a history of calcium deficiency in children. Don't worry about it. Andy www.noamalgam.com www.noamalgam.com/hairtestbook.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 <<Dana is a very nice, decent and well meaning person, but I really do suggest people ignore what she has to say.>> I'm really thankful for Dana and all the support she provides so many as well as yourself, Jan and several others that share their experiences. I know the 8 hour protocol she used is not ideal and I know why. I'm intrigued by how she dotoxed all 4 of her kids using it and saw great improvements without the horror stories that sometimes get reported.? Why do you think it worked so well for her? Perhaps using the chelator every 8 hours is safer than taking it every other day or doing the IVs? Just curious. Rosegvr/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 >>>>>>I know the 8 hour protocol she used is not ideal and I know why. I'm intrigued by how she dotoxed all 4 of her kids using it and saw great improvements without the horror stories that sometimes get reported.? Why do you think it worked so well for her? >>>>>> Not all smokers get lung cancer.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 I realize this but I think 5 for 5 successfully detoxed is kind of interesting. Other than that, I'm not sure why Andy would suggest people don't listen to her. 95% of her posts seem to be about how to deal with yeast, viruses, supplements and answering questions about his protocol.? She's not only done him a world of good, (since she seldom discusses her protocol) but she's been a life line for the overwrought Mothers living day to day with high need autistic children. Her help helps others implement, cope and stick with the long, sometimes painful and expensive detox process.? When I think of people that I admire, trust and respect, Dana is at the top of that list. Rosegvr/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 >>>>>I realize this but I think 5 for 5 successfully detoxed is kind of interesting.>>>>>> You have to be careful how you define " successfully detoxed " . Maybe her kids would be even better today if she had used 3 hour dosing. As far as i know they improved a lot. Doesn't mean all were cured. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.