what's affront in changing a subject line? // was: Re: Vote For McCain-Palin

[Guest guest]

Did you vote?

> >

> > Hi Dana,

> >

> > I don't think there was any evidence to suggest list moderation

had

> > anything to do with my post being " vacated " . If I thought so I

know

> > how to contact you.

> >

> > The affront was deliberate and the lack of substance and childish

> > behavior in gutting the message and converting the header is

> > completely telling.

>

> What is it that you are saying was done that you think is

> improper?

>

> The changing headers part sounds **courteous** to me. Generally

> people who change the subject on posts are doing so to reflect

> what they are commenting about. I do it when I'm paying attention,

> and occassionally forget to. NOT changing the subject line is

> more where I would think there's a problem.

>

> And by " gutted " do you mean the responses quoted only a portion

> of your text? That's also something would generally think is

> appropriate and helpful. But, I don't know if that's what you

> are saying is an affront.

>

> Moria

> >

>