Guest guest Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 Sir Re: /message/11624 I feel that although on the basis of the wording of the section it seems that the organisation will not qualify as a non-profit organisation in case it works for the benefit of members means if it only limits it works to people who are members. But, any CBO would not stop working for Sex workers, MSM etc just because they are not their members. A CBO would work for them whether they are members or not, hence any CBO cannot be said to be working only for its members and would not have such conditions in its bye laws. Secondly, as per clause i of the said definition, the organisation should be established for benefit of general public, and Sex workers, MSM etc are all part of general public. The idea behind this legislation is to take away the benefit from those organisations which only work for the benefit of their members and not for general public. Another, aspect is that the funds given by SACS are restricted grants to be used as per the guidelines and directions. These grants do not result in any profit for a CBO. Hence, the question of grants of SACS being effected does not arise. The matter would only affect the excess of income over expenditure which an NPO has and its usage in program purposes. Regards, CA. Anshuman Bardhan e-mail: <anshumanbardhan@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.