Guest guest Posted October 22, 2010 Report Share Posted October 22, 2010 Dear All, The paper entitled, ‘Challenges in HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care and Treatment Program in India : Policies and Priorities under National AIDS Control Programme Phase-III (2007-12)’ has been published in SAARC-Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS, Vol II(1), 2010 (pp 1-7). http://www.nepjol.info/index.php/SAARCTB/issue/current This paper explores the pertinent challenges of Government’s HIV/AIDS prevention, care and treatment program in India. It also provides an opportunity to assess the HIV response to understand what must be done to ensure that India is on course to achieve the goal of universal access to prevention and treatment. The paper is based on the review of annual action reports, policy documents, etc published by national and international, governmental and non-governmental organizations (UNAIDS, WHO, UNGASS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare) and interactions with key program managers and implementers at state, district and various facility levels. Study findings conclude that program is well–structured and well–tailored considering the national as well as local needs, ensuring implementation of evidence-informed policies and programs. Being a large country with wide variations in social, geo-physical and health service patterns across the States and regions, it was necessary to prepare a plan that is technically sound and uniform but allows flexibility and adaptability at the local level. The National AIDS Control Programme Phase III (NACP-III) is guided by the three-ones principle and this acts as a unifying factor for the national response and helps to set standards of quality for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment programs. Strategic and program interventions are evidence-based and result-oriented with scope for innovations and flexibility. Priority is accorded to specific local contexts and interventions planned accordingly. To maintain quality and standards of the services uniformly across the country and monitor the programs consistently to assess progress against the national goals, operational guidelines for State AIDS Control Society (SACS), DAPCU and all facilities have been developed. These guidelines work as referral document for implementing units and service delivery systems. Setting up of District AIDS Prevention Control Unit (DAPCU) has made program management and implementation easier, which has helped in better monitoring, linkages within the program and with general health systems at the district level. However, it has been suggested that DAPCU should be set up in a need-based and state specific manner depending upon the size of the district, extent of the problem and estimated number of high-risk population. DAPCU should be set up irrespective of categorization of district based HIV Sentinel Surveillance alone. Districts not having DAPCU should have some alternate arrangement for monitoring at district level. The convergence of decentralized delivery system with other health system is helpful in long term sustainability of the program. The main challenge lies in increasing the availability of prevention and treatment in resource-limited areas. The expansion of HIV prevention and treatment services is currently hindered by weak infrastructure, limited human and financial resources, and poor integration of HIV-specific interventions within broader reproductive and child health services. Technical staff appointed for program implementation and service delivery is contractual. The attrition rate of contractual staff is high due to job insecurity, lack of benefits/incentives and lack of growth options. High turnover of staff and frequent transfer of regular staff especially Project Directors is also a constraint in some States. There is need to strengthen monitoring and supervision of program managers at SACS and DAPCU to take informed decisions. It would be important to examine these issues at national and State levels and take corrective actions to achieve the goal of halting and later reversing the epidemic of HIV/AIDS in India. The study is based on the observations of a few program sites, DAPCU and SACS Offices as representativeness of sites was not the goal of the study. Dr. Ruchi Sogarwal Program Officer-Evaluation & Research National AIDS Control Organization 6th Floor, Chandralok Building, 36 Janpath, New Delhi, INDIA E-mail: ruchi.dr@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.