Guest guest Posted December 2, 2010 Report Share Posted December 2, 2010 Dear all, Probably this is stupid question still may be worth sharing. I see various statistics from varying sources many claim the prevalence of HIV is decreasing. Does it mean that we are allowing more people to die in comparison to the the new infections? If new infections and death are equal the prevalence should remain the same. If new infections are less than the number of deaths we should still see an increasing prevalence. I am also interested to know how the new infections are estimated regards -- Dr Ajithkumar.K Asst Professor In Dermatology and Venereology Medical college Chest Hospital MG Kav,Trichur, Kerala ,India Ph 04872333322 (res) 9447226012 E-MAIL: <ajisudha@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2010 Report Share Posted December 3, 2010 Dear All, Re: /message/12314 Thats a vital question by Dr Ajithkumar and one to strike first before relying on the statistics. The prevalence is bound to increase if the mortality is reduced and lives prolonged by use of HAART and even if incidence is reduced. Prevalence can come down only if deaths exceed the new infections in absence of emigration of those infected. Dr. Balraj Singh, Assistant Professor (Epidemiology), Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh e-mail: <drbalraj@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2010 Report Share Posted December 3, 2010 No one really knows! Re: /message/12314 Our data set are estimates-best estimates from available data researched,reported ,verified,verifiable and not so verifiable! Then comes the projections ,again, based on assumptions/presumptions and some real ,reported data set. How does it really matter as long as we continue to work for care,cure and prevention regards, Baxi RK.Baxi e-mail: <rkbaxi196@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2010 Report Share Posted December 3, 2010 Dear All, Re: /message/12314 Please find a press release report on HIV Estimation done using Spectrum & EPP modelling method.. Regards -- Dr. Laxmikant Chavan MD,DNB Epidemiologist, drlbchavan@... Cell: +91-9904379545 1 of 1 File(s) NACO Press Release on HIV Estimates_01 Dec 10.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2010 Report Share Posted December 8, 2010 Method of estimating new HIV infections Re: /message/12314 Indeed a vital question by Dr. Ajitkumar that with declining mortality the prevalence should increase. One possible reason for lack of this trend in India is the estimation of HIV prevalence for general population based of the HIV prevalence among women attending ANC. Especially with increasing up-take of HIV testing there is increasing proportion of women who know about their HIV status. And making the assumption that the fertility desires of women are not affected after they know about their HIV status could be misleading. Decline in fertility among women after knowing their HIV status might affect their attendance at ANC clinics and thus affect HIV prevalence estimation. Therefore, in this scenario, inspite of decrease in the mortality the prevalence, which is mainly estimated from ANC, can show reduction. However, currently we do not have any data from India investigating fertility rate among women after they know about their HIV status hence this proposition can not be supported with any data or evidence. Dr. Shirish Darak, PhD student, University of Groningen , The Netherlands Member, PRAYAS Health Group, Pune e-mail: <shirishdarak@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.