Guest guest Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 The nutshell question I want to ask is: If a child is taken off his antibiotic when he is still sick with Lyme and co-infections, does the Lyme have an opportunity to spread? Here's the background story. And I would so appreciate any advice on this. Particularly if you understand how Lyme spreads. Thanks... My 4 year old, Lev, has been on Biaxin (Clarithromycin, 1ml 2x/day) for five months (been sick with Lev for 2.5 years and on meds the entire time but for the first few months). I just discovered that his pharmacist made a HUGE mistake. His prescription was accurate. It says to take the meds for 30 days. But the pharmacist was supposed to be giving us two bottles of medicine and the first we take for 14 days and the second we mix only then and take for an additional14 days. Instead we have been given only one bottle each month for 5 months which means that for the first two weeks of each month, Lev would get his medicine and then for two weeks the disease was allowed to spread unchecked (or at least that is my understanding, but I'm still hoping that I am wrong!). Lev has been deteriorating and we could not figure out why. Loss of all speech was Lev's first symptom and he is in speech therapy every day. Now, once again, when he talks we barely understand him (neither do his teachers, speech therapist etc). He has been crankier, clingy, aggressive and irritable. Cries at the least little thing. Of course I will call my docs (N. CA doc and CT doc) tomorrow, but I'm so worried since I’ve asked them many times before if stopping meds allows the disease to spread and the answer has always been yes (I ask because if not then I would “try” to take the kids off medication more often, but since " yes " I can’t take that chance too often). So back to my questions: 1) Is it possible his not getting medication for 2 of every 4 weeks for five months has NOT harmed him (seems hard to believe given his deterioration)? And, 2) If it HAS harmed him, would you take any legal action against the pharmacist. Already my expenses have gone up due to this mistake. I need to fly the 4 of us to CT to see that doc this month (at his request), each therapy session is a fortune, etc, etc. And this is to say nothing of the fact that this mistake may mean that he has to stay on medication even longer, with all of the associated problems of that, etc. And a zillion other awful consequences of being sick longer. It's so easy to think litigiously. And I don't want to be like that. And I know that the pharmacist is human and he did not do it on purpose, but, rather, made a mistake. On the other, this mistake could potentially be quite costly in so so many ways if indeed the absence of medication has allowed the disease to worsen. We have to bear the burden of his mistake. But do we also need to shoulder the added costs due to his mistake? Feel free to email me at home or post on line. Thank you so much, Beth beth@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 I am so sorry the mistake wasn't found sooner. Certainly if he didn't have the meds he was supposed to have the illness had the opportunity to progress. Hopefully when he is put back on the meds the way he's supposed to be, he'll get better quickly. I would consult a lawyer, if it's not going to cost a fortune, to see if he thinks you would have a good chance of winning a suit. Five months is a long time for such a young child. The damage to their immune system can make it much harder for them to recover. My daughter got Lyme from me in utero but wasn't diagnosed until she was 12. The docs said we almost didn't get her there in time. If we had waited much longer her immune system would have been too compromised for her to get better. But she did get well. She got worse before she got better, but she did recover. Thank God you got your child help. Try to remember to take a breath and that believe it or not it could be worse. You realized the problem and now can get him the treatment he needs. He's only missed some of his meds for 5 months. It stinks but you caught it and now you can get him on the right treatment. If you have a good doc he's going to get better. All my best to you. Annie ________________________________ From: Beth Freishtat <beth@...> CaliforniaLyme ; Sent: Sun, January 9, 2011 7:08:09 PM Subject: [ ] I am so furious and sad!!! Any advice? The nutshell question I want to ask is: If a child is taken off his antibiotic when he is still sick with Lyme and co-infections, does the Lyme have an opportunity to spread? Here's the background story. And I would so appreciate any advice on this. Particularly if you understand how Lyme spreads. Thanks... My 4 year old, Lev, has been on Biaxin (Clarithromycin, 1ml 2x/day) for five months (been sick with Lev for 2.5 years and on meds the entire time but for the first few months). I just discovered that his pharmacist made a HUGE mistake. His prescription was accurate. It says to take the meds for 30 days. But the pharmacist was supposed to be giving us two bottles of medicine and the first we take for 14 days and the second we mix only then and take for an additional14 days. Instead we have been given only one bottle each month for 5 months which means that for the first two weeks of each month, Lev would get his medicine and then for two weeks the disease was allowed to spread unchecked (or at least that is my understanding, but I'm still hoping that I am wrong!). Lev has been deteriorating and we could not figure out why. Loss of all speech was Lev's first symptom and he is in speech therapy every day. Now, once again, when he talks we barely understand him (neither do his teachers, speech therapist etc). He has been crankier, clingy, aggressive and irritable. Cries at the least little thing. Of course I will call my docs (N. CA doc and CT doc) tomorrow, but I'm so worried since I’ve asked them many times before if stopping meds allows the disease to spread and the answer has always been yes (I ask because if not then I would “try†to take the kids off medication more often, but since " yes " I can’t take that chance too often). So back to my questions: 1) Is it possible his not getting medication for 2 of every 4 weeks for five months has NOT harmed him (seems hard to believe given his deterioration)? And, 2) If it HAS harmed him, would you take any legal action against the pharmacist. Already my expenses have gone up due to this mistake. I need to fly the 4 of us to CT to see that doc this month (at his request), each therapy session is a fortune, etc, etc. And this is to say nothing of the fact that this mistake may mean that he has to stay on medication even longer, with all of the associated problems of that, etc. And a zillion other awful consequences of being sick longer. It's so easy to think litigiously. And I don't want to be like that. And I know that the pharmacist is human and he did not do it on purpose, but, rather, made a mistake. On the other, this mistake could potentially be quite costly in so so many ways if indeed the absence of medication has allowed the disease to worsen. We have to bear the burden of his mistake. But do we also need to shoulder the added costs due to his mistake? Feel free to email me at home or post on line. Thank you so much, Beth beth@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.