Guest guest Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I have never heard of this. Personally I think it might still be in the realms of science fiction. ade > > I know this article is somewhat old, but anyone have any information about this study? I believe that would be the best method of TRT. > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17323263.800-testosterone-transplant.html > > http://www.springerlink.com/content/70586174xt4r5208/ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 It looks like a blind alley of scientific experimentation. Even if it were promising, there would be many processes to go through before it were FDA approved and even more before insurance covered it. In addition to the problem of tissue rejection, there would be a problem with regulating the production of testosterone and responding to the signals generated by the pituitary. It's really a variation of an old idea, such as the one practiced by this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/_R._Brinkley Randy Hoops Springfield, MO > > I know this article is somewhat old, but anyone have any information about this study? I believe that would be the best method of TRT. > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17323263.800-testosterone-transplant.html > > http://www.springerlink.com/content/70586174xt4r5208/ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.