Re: Dr Natole from Michigan.

November 26, 1999

Hello,

What is so sad about Dr. Natole, is he was found not guilty by the judge, but

the Michigan medical board still sanctioned him. Where is the justice in

all the time and money spent for the trial.? He was my doctor too.

connie, MI

November 27, 1999

Christie,

You made wonderful points about how doctors are making money from

diseases. I agree, Dr N messed up with the infusion company, yet he was

doing nothing that other doctors do not already do. I know many who have

interests in XRay companies, as well as labs, including our favorite doctor

to hate Dr Steere....the word is kickback, and it is illegal. Especially

for a medical person whose interests should be only for the patient and not

his pocket. But, the large majority of doctors do it, maybe this is why

they hate HMO's so much, they are restricted to the plans ancillary

services.

What happened to Dr N, & O was a crime in itself though, but in Dr N's case

it would not have happened were he not investigated for overtreatment of LD.

More complaints need to be made about the enemy camp I guess, an

investigation, witch hunt could put them out of business too.

Hugs,

Marta NJ

>From: " C.Tab. " <tab@...>

>My bag of diagnoises includes CFIDS/FM. I consulted a local CFIDS doc at

>the expense of my mother as I could not afford $500/hr(becuase of " time

>spent " ), expensive supplements sold out of the office, tests and office

>calls not covered my insurance - in fact, this doc did not participate with

>any insurance carriers. That was never a problem with Dr, N., and adequate

>time was spent with me. As a list owner now I hear about doctors who set

>themselves as CFIDS experts, charge high fees that are unaffordable to most

>people- especially those too ill to work, write books, take speaking

>engagements, endorse questionable supplements, see little if any

>improvement in patient health (as opposed to lyme treatment), yet they are

>not investigated. I thought perhaps it is because CFIDS is not taken

>seriously by much of the medical community, but neither, it appears, is

>lyme!

Recommended Posts