Dr. Buttar appears to be vindicated of board harassment

March 31, 2010

Despite my personal views on the merits of what he is doing, it appears from

this article

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/31/1347104/reprimand-lets-doctor-contin\

ue.html

that Dr. Rashid Buttar was the unfortunate victim of malicious harassment by

evil criminals pretending to protect us while actually preventing sick people

from getting proper care. They had managed to get themselves appointed as the

licensing board.

While many corrupt licensing boards will babble about 'placebo controlled

trials,' they all know what they are implying is a Big Lie in the Hitlerian

sense. After all, the placebo controlled trial is a relatively modern

invention. Older therapies have not been subjected to it yet continue to be

used because it is generally accepted as unethical to deny them to the 'placebo'

arm of a trial when everyone knows they work. It is only therapies the board

wants to PRETEND don't work, and stop, precisely because they DO work (such as

chelation curing physician induced autism) that are the subject of this rule.

How do I know this? When the California medical board was being out of control

and persecuting alternative doctors for knowing what they were doing (complete

with armed police intimidating witnesses who wished to appear in the doctors'

favor), I attended a meeting, pointed out to the board members that there had

never been a controlled trial of general anesthesia to ameliorate surgical pain,

and invited them to organize a crossover trial of it and all volunteer as

subjects. The horrified looks on their faces made it clear they understood

perfectly well that general anesthesia works fine even though it has never been,

as they would say, " scientifically proven. "

No medical board member should be allowed to sit in judgment over any

alternative doctor based on whether a therapy is 'proven' until AFTER they have

been a subject in that clinical trial, getting cut once with anesthesia and once

without it, or have declined to receive anesthesia during major surgery. If the

board members don't believe in their own standards of determining which

treatments should be used, why should they be considered anything other than

evilly corrupt to impose those standards on others?

Andy

http://www.noamalgam.com/index.html

Amalgam Illness: Diagnosis and Treatment

http://www.noamalgam.com/hairtestbook.html

Hair Test Interpretation: Finding Hidden Toxicities

http://www.noamalgam.com/nourishinghope.html

Nourishing Hope for Autism: Nutrition Intervention for Healing Our Children

http://www.noamalgam.com/biologicaltreatments.html

Biological Treatments for Autism and PDD

March 31, 2010

Touche!

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:55 AM, andrewhallcutler <AndyCutler@...>wrote:

>

> Despite my personal views on the merits of what he is doing, it appears

> from this article

>

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/31/1347104/reprimand-lets-doctor-contin\

ue.html

>

> that Dr. Rashid Buttar was the unfortunate victim of malicious harassment

> by evil criminals pretending to protect us while actually preventing sick

> people from getting proper care. They had managed to get themselves

> appointed as the licensing board.

>

> While many corrupt licensing boards will babble about 'placebo controlled

> trials,' they all know what they are implying is a Big Lie in the Hitlerian

> sense. After all, the placebo controlled trial is a relatively modern

> invention. Older therapies have not been subjected to it yet continue to be

> used because it is generally accepted as unethical to deny them to the

> 'placebo' arm of a trial when everyone knows they work. It is only therapies

> the board wants to PRETEND don't work, and stop, precisely because they DO

> work (such as chelation curing physician induced autism) that are the

> subject of this rule.

>

> How do I know this? When the California medical board was being out of

> control and persecuting alternative doctors for knowing what they were doing

> (complete with armed police intimidating witnesses who wished to appear in

> the doctors' favor), I attended a meeting, pointed out to the board members

> that there had never been a controlled trial of general anesthesia to

> ameliorate surgical pain, and invited them to organize a crossover trial of

> it and all volunteer as subjects. The horrified looks on their faces made it

> clear they understood perfectly well that general anesthesia works fine even

> though it has never been, as they would say, " scientifically proven. "

>

> No medical board member should be allowed to sit in judgment over any

> alternative doctor based on whether a therapy is 'proven' until AFTER they

> have been a subject in that clinical trial, getting cut once with anesthesia

> and once without it, or have declined to receive anesthesia during major

> surgery. If the board members don't believe in their own standards of

> determining which treatments should be used, why should they be considered

> anything other than evilly corrupt to impose those standards on others?

>

> Andy

>

> http://www.noamalgam.com/index.html

> Amalgam Illness: Diagnosis and Treatment

>

> http://www.noamalgam.com/hairtestbook.html

> Hair Test Interpretation: Finding Hidden Toxicities

>

> http://www.noamalgam.com/nourishinghope.html

> Nourishing Hope for Autism: Nutrition Intervention for Healing Our Children

>

> http://www.noamalgam.com/biologicaltreatments.html

> Biological Treatments for Autism and PDD

>

--

God's blessings in Christ,

Your Partner in Health,

N. Rydland, M.D.

Founder and developer of kidsWellness, Inc.

Natural products and information for healthier families

www.kidswellness.com

www.rydlandjuice.com

Main office:

1921 Commonwealth Drive

Charlottesville, VA 22901

434-984-KIDS (5437)

Fax: 434-984-5439

Other offices:

140 N.E. 119 St

North Miami, FL

2316 Hollywood Blvd

Hollywood, Fl 33020

12595 S.W. 137 Ave, Suite 108

Miami Fl 33186

135 San Lorenzo Ave., Suite 640

Coral Gables, FL 33146

March 31, 2010

Hi All, (A long post, for those who would have the time for It, as I've taken

the time for It

If the state really cared (about individuals and justice, Thereof?) it would

report (to all of Us?) the facts of what people think and feel (of what and of

those that it regulates? of such regulation? of Communication

Regualtion/Moderation by Communication?) rather than making privacy, (of what is

in the public domain?) confidentiality agreements, and waivers of responsibility

the thing, is my sense of it and the real problem we're facing, where those who

seem to have something to hide should be considered the more likely problem? and

God help us where it's our own trusted protectors (with all the resources it has

for as much? if not worse? .. .

I want my privacy but I don't consider what I want to be kept private a virtue,

NO.. What gets out there as far as information goes is " everyone's " bonus/asset

as far as I'm concerned, of our Enlightenment should be concerned? (of what

establishes the more reasonable, Justness) of Communication and The spirit,

Thereof, forgiving me for my artistic/subjective side/flair, of my communication

for the moment? Not, really, seeking y/our forgiveness for saying so, no, but

quite the contrary, of asking God to forgive us, otherwise.. .

Take It or leave It of what is more Intelligent of Intelligence (Itself)

Thereof, of " The " choice is y/ours, Thereof, I Feel as Understand.. . ! (by as

much.. .

The state is definitely playing a double standard where " it " is the wrong thing

to be doing as much, (that anyone should be doing as much?) of it being

entrusted to serving " justness, " but what else? but how else? (of what we should

be expecting and demanding from our state for us to be fair and understanding

[by as much] as to be " seen " to be fair?) as far as *I'm* concerned, (of Feeling

as Understanding) not to mention the " mess " the " justice system " is with respect

to how exhorbitant and out of reach it typically is to individuals, (justice)

that that also isn't the essence of the problem? of *process* abuse, (that, oh,

so works for some more than others, be sure? that I Know?) calling that for what

it is, where where we can't say as much what can we say, for as much, is not so

much a question for me (When has the state every respected our Feeling/s [of

language, of our individual form of expression?] in that respect of the

" primary " facts, of the primary process of the primary thing? of Understanding

More [Thereof] that any other facts would be so meaningful at All?

No, I'm not communicating only for the lowest common denominator of politics? by

saying what I say, of The way, otherwise? .. .

I do believe God is also being shut out of the conversation in that respect (of

our politics) of God is as reasonable as God Is, Thereof, where you would have

God as of as much, Thereof? .. . of God is what you believe where God would be

so meaningful at All? Where God is not an authority figure at all, (otherwise,

to me) that we should be so stupid or confused or brainwashed (bigoted?) to

think so, perhaps

Yes, my questioning has gone that far.. I'm not at all so sure about others in

that respect, though, that anything else should matter? but in dealing with

abuse *to* as much? .. . (where I don't have much use for *postive* otherwise,

in the grander/more objective state of things.. .

I'm very sure the state hasn't got that right, and perhaps by association if not

collusion if not corruption? " many others, " where I should say as much for all

there is of as much (but what else? .. .

Our Feeling/s do make such sense if not all sense (where we acknowledge and

respect them for as much? of what is primary? to science even if not Especially?

of Understanding More by as much, that anything else should matter.. .

On my hope for Us, the BS that would exist (and does exist) otherwise, of our

Feeling/s being The thing, of The thing, Thereof

My sense of It, where you wanted to know as much for *your* self, that there

should be anyone else like me in that respect, perhaps, but, perhaps also now

where that shouldn't be so necessary, of what an Individual can mean and do for

everything else, in that respect of as much? .. . Here's more than hoping so

To the Individual!

Glavic

On The primary thing/s as far as I'm concerned, Thereof

Thanks for your attention in that respect. It was *my* pleasure to share that

with you here.. Yes, I believe forcing vaccination on any Individual's space

(without their understanding and agreement?) is a " blatant " grotesque violation

of the Individual and " very " unconstitution, of " Hitleresque " proportions, and

that an official language (nonetheless?) is an abomination of all that I believe

in, (of Communication and The spirit, Thereof?) and I also have other issues

with our political, social, state... no doubt, of as much, of being for

" justice, " socialism, of calling things as we would, Feel (as for the individual

and the individual's sovereign/inalienable rights, of " responsibilities, " no

less, Thereof) where I would be for " socialism " at all.. .

For " justness " (for Individuals, of our Individuality, of our Identity, no less,

of what that takes?) or for nothing at All, I Feel as Understand.. It was *my*

pleasure to do the " analysis " for Us in that respect

I figured that that's what we should be about where we would be so meaningful at

All, that " everything " else could be so well understood.. .

It's more about what our state can do for Us, as Individuals of an

Individuality, of individualizing what needs to be individualized? (including

the vaccination schedule, and education, and health, Etc., of Justice) rather

than the other way around, to be serving Us, of as much? that I or my PDD son

needs a state " otherwise " .. . (I Feel as Understand.. .

On being that different? My hope for All, of Us. That we " shouldn't " have a

" problem " with that (of, and by, as much.. .

Now go get 'em?!. (Get 'em even further? .. .

On OUR *primary* responsibility, to each other and All, Thereof

Where WE are not about Individual " justice " (of justice socialism, if we want a

name to give to the phenomena of all that for here and now of this issue in

particular in relation to a truer people's state? true to justice of as much,

where justice begins in the home if not in the heart where it would begin at

All?) we're not about anything so meaningful, I Feel as Understand

On serving Justice. Thanks for having me in that respect

>

> Despite my personal views on the merits of what he is doing, it appears from

this article

>

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/31/1347104/reprimand-lets-doctor-contin\

ue.html

>

> that Dr. Rashid Buttar was the unfortunate victim of malicious harassment by