essay: Resources for understanding the Vaccine Court's thimerosal decrees of March 12, 2010

[Guest guest]

The Vaccine Court's special masters relied heavily upon several Denmark

studies which - according to various critiques - may have been fatally

flawed. A central issue is, Did the increasing rate of autism change

pursuant to the removal of thimerosal from various vaccines? Clearly,

the special masters relied heavily on Madsen et al 2002, Madsen et al

2003, and Hviid 2003. If Safeminds and other critiques of those studies

are correct, then the special masters' decrees of March 12, 2010, may be

founded upon misleading findings.

The link herein is to a document which is less an essay and more a

repository of relevant links. I'm willing to add important links to the

repository, so let me know if I missed an important critique or summary.

essay: Resources for understanding the Vaccine Court's thimerosal

decrees of March 12, 2010

<http://www.generationrescue.org/binstock/100315-vaccine-court-used-flawed-thime\

rosal-studies.htm>

Binstock, Mar 15, 2010

This post may be forwarded hither & yon.

*/./*