My latest in defending us (Individuals) at the/a Discover Mag blog

[Guest guest]

A long sentence, perhaps.

I'm thinking most so-called anti-vaxxers want the vaccination schedule

*individualized* to their individual child's condition with respect to risks of

complication to vaccination, (which there are risks, or would we wish to debate

that? and if not science then what, for as much?) and to be given the choice of

going with what to innoculate/inject into " their " bodies (or would they be ours?

and by what law?) of whatever schedule might better work more specifically for

them and their situation (vs. being forced/abused? into their primordial

jurisdiction/space, on another's terms? so what would be theirs again?) of their

constitutional right to understand and agree to as much (of at least being

treated so respectfully, or how should they react? to invasion if not abuse? of

what consequences they would have to bear with in that respect of taking a risk

where a pre-existing condition is concerned, (and herd immunity would give us

all some breathing room in that respect, of each other? that there would be if

we wanted to be so honest? and considerate? of each other?) where the truth

about vaccines and autism with respect to the individual, of justice, as the

matter, cannot be considered done as far as science is really concerned with

respect to science being about continuing the research to establish " greater "

certainty (of fact, as wrong as science has been in the past, otherwise) as it

applies to individuals and individual realities in that respect, where it would

be science if not a more comprehensive science at all, of all, of the necessary

facts to the qualities of life, other factors somewhat being treated as less

relevent where justice and health for the individual is concerned, where we

would be about as much, I mean, thereof, of, I can't think of a better way of

serving " justice " (individual justice, that there would be any other kind) in

such an injustice world otherwise, where I realize me of this alone wouldn't

make it just enough

Why not individualize the vaccination schedule where there are grounds for as

much, and a safety margin for as much, might be the more meaningful question to

be asking, rather than mischaracterizing anti-vaxxers and the issue, as I feel

we too often do, with respect to eliciting the trust such an issue demands.

Another blog is running at:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/03/31/more-truth-based-weapo\

ns-against-the-antivaxxers/

and somewhat trying to run us down (individuals, where we are as much?) again,

that I'm addressing, (trying to address) of as much.. .

Best wishes, Thereof

Glavic

[Guest guest]

More on this, of The phenomena? .. .

Where the moderator/s of the Discover Mag blog recommended that its readership

ignore me, of my, word salad? .. . (on the buffet of life?

Leader of my world?!.

****

Oh, oh, it's the academic (of the political academia?) police, Todd trying to

speak for the phenomena again, is my sense of It

Tch, Tch. I'm not thinking that's so smart, but, at least we know how he feels,

about those facts? that any others should matter? Seems you're quite the

authority around here, " Todd, " that we'd be needing authority, over reason, The

reason, of God? (God of as much? where you can do The analysis for your self? or

maybe where the English language is easier to police and get your plum of as

much? as shallow as that is?

Why is the Discover Mag blog on to science not so much for " justice " (for the

individual, that it would be justice, weird educated people otherwise? of a

buffet, perhaps) speaks of its injustice and abuse and immorality (and lack of

objectivity, of sensitivity?) as far as I'm concerned

That should be enough of a sentence in your language to figure at least that

much out I'm thinking, of my hope for you, of Us, where our feeling/s would be

concerned, of Understanding More, but how and what else is not so much a

question for me alone (as nice as being as alone as I really am is? .. .

Oh, yeah. Why would I want to be, stupid?!. (Confused) I don't.. . So, I'm

feeling you should wise up Todd, and others, by my helping where I can in that

respect, like It or not

Mike Glavic

Evolved version, of how that works, of The phenomena, Thereof. Just add to It

(in a more complementary way? for as much?) for more of as much I would

recommend for Us, Thereof. Not a contest (No (Of my being able to judge that for

my self, Thereof

Best wishes in that respect, of The " phenomena, " where it might not be language

to you, otherwise.. .

>

> A long sentence, perhaps.

>

> I'm thinking most so-called anti-vaxxers want the vaccination schedule

*individualized* to their individual child's condition with respect to risks of

complication to vaccination, (which there are risks, or would we wish to debate

that? and if not science then what, for as much?) and to be given the choice of

going with what to innoculate/inject into " their " bodies (or would they be ours?

and by what law?) of whatever schedule might better work more specifically for

them and their situation (vs. being forced/abused? into their primordial

jurisdiction/space, on another's terms? so what would be theirs again?) of their

constitutional right to understand and agree to as much (of at least being

treated so respectfully, or how should they react? to invasion if not abuse? of

what consequences they would have to bear with in that respect of taking a risk

where a pre-existing condition is concerned, (and herd immunity would give us

all some breathing room in that respect, of each other? that there would be if

we wanted to be so honest? and considerate? of each other?) where the truth

about vaccines and autism with respect to the individual, of justice, as the

matter, cannot be considered done as far as science is really concerned with

respect to science being about continuing the research to establish " greater "

certainty (of fact, as wrong as science has been in the past, otherwise) as it

applies to individuals and individual realities in that respect, where it would

be science if not a more comprehensive science at all, of all, of the necessary

facts to the qualities of life, other factors somewhat being treated as less

relevent where justice and health for the individual is concerned, where we

would be about as much, I mean, thereof, of, I can't think of a better way of

serving " justice " (individual justice, that there would be any other kind) in

such an injustice world otherwise, where I realize me of this alone wouldn't

make it just enough

>

> Why not individualize the vaccination schedule where there are grounds for as

much, and a safety margin for as much, might be the more meaningful question to

be asking, rather than mischaracterizing anti-vaxxers and the issue, as I feel

we too often do, with respect to eliciting the trust such an issue demands.

>

> Another blog is running at:

>

>

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/03/31/more-truth-based-weapo\

ns-against-the-antivaxxers/

>

> and somewhat trying to run us down (individuals, where we are as much?) again,

that I'm addressing, (trying to address) of as much.. .

>

> Best wishes, Thereof

>

> Glavic

>