Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

NON Toxic Mercury vs. Toxic Mercury

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148 & sid=10121605 

Unfortunately, they are no longer accepting comments on the article about

mercury in Great Salt Lake.

I wanted to ask what fool wrote the story. They said that the lake is getting

contaminated with toxic Methyl mercury, as opposed to NON TOXIC MERCURY! 

 

Did the reporter flunk chemistry 101?

There is one paragraph that really defies belief.  

" The water moving south from the railroad has a dense brine layer. A form of

bacteria thrives in it and feeds by changing non-toxic mercury into toxic methyl

mercury. "

And to think, since 1930 Pharma, FDA, CDC and whoever else has been telling the

sheeple that putting mercury in vaccines will kill any bacteria that might get

into the vial. 

 

Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you.

Ben lin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...