Re: Parent banned from the list-question for Dana, the moderator

[Guest guest]

Hi Dana,

Can you please share with the group why Ross was removed from the group?

Should we be concerned with the advice he was given? I think a lot of us are

very dissapointed he was banned and feel the need for an explanation. At least

set our minds at ease that the advice he was dispensing was appropriate and

helpful as I for one have been learning and following the protocol along with

his guidance and suggestions.

Thanks for any information you are willing to share

P.

> >

> > Unless was giving wrong information or his advice was

> > dangerous, which doesn't seem to be the case...why was he removed? He

> > was consistently one of the listmates who would take the time and

> > answer questions and look over hair result tests and immediatly reply

> > to my questions which I completely appreciate. In my opinion he was an

> > asset and I think a lot of us are confused as to why he was removed.

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Second this. Please if the reason was banned b/c he was dispensing bad

advice, we need to know.

If it was just his style of communication, people can chose not to read his

messages.

I find his comments useful and very timely. He makes the time to respond and

explain.

> > >

> > > Unless was giving wrong information or his advice was

> > > dangerous, which doesn't seem to be the case...why was he removed? He

> > > was consistently one of the listmates who would take the time and

> > > answer questions and look over hair result tests and immediatly reply

> > > to my questions which I completely appreciate. In my opinion he was an

> > > asset and I think a lot of us are confused as to why he was removed.

> > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

I would also like the moderators to be transparent about their reasons for

banning or restricting member activity in the forum.

I can't claim to follow all discussions here, but I think that what is missing

from this group is some open moderator intervention in controversial posts to

quiet things and warn members that they are deviating from the rules. Maybe even

put a particular member on moderation for a while until things calm down, but I

think this should be done openly.

It seems to me that has had a lot of good advice. He knows the AC

protocol and helps other parents and it's not like there are tons of folks on

the forum who have the time to help us out. I'm with others who say let's try to

manage our members a bit better to preserve the precious help they give parents.

I've offered to help moderate in the past & am still willing to help out.

> >

> > Hi Dana,

> > Can you please share with the group why Ross was removed from the

group? Should we be concerned with the advice he was given? I think a lot of us

are very dissapointed he was banned and feel the need for an explanation. At

least set our minds at ease that the advice he was dispensing was appropriate

and helpful as I for one have been learning and following the protocol along

with his guidance and suggestions.

> >

> > Thanks for any information you are willing to share

> > P.

[Guest guest]

Below is general information that, at the direction of the list owner, I apply

consistently to everyone.

I remove members from the group who will not follow the list rules, even after

repeated warning. Those who post obvious spam are not provided warnings.

I don't remove people who give advice which I question or disagree with. Only

for violations of list rules.

When I notice violations of list rules, I send private emails. I warn anyone

[except those who post obvious spam] that appears to be violating list rules.

Banning anyone does not mean that the person can't just sign up again under a

different ID. Spammers do this all the time. So can anyone else.

Dana

[moderator]

[Guest guest]

It was because of the fight that he was having with Best. They were both

banned.

This has been an ongoing arguement between the two.

I'm not saying I agree, but that's what happened.

Had nothing to do with his advice. He is very knowledgeable. Basically he

repeats what Andy says, just like I try to do sometimes.

If you read Andy's books and comprehend their meaning by really studying them,

you too can be helpful to other parents who are new and struggling.

TJ

________________________________

From: sky2sun2moon <sky2sun22@...>

Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 6:36:21 PM

Subject: [ ] Re: Parent banned from the list-question for Dana, the

moderator

 

Second this. Please if the reason was banned b/c he was dispensing bad

advice, we need to know.

If it was just his style of communication, people can chose not to read his

messages.

I find his comments useful and very timely. He makes the time to respond and

explain.

> > >

> > > Unless was giving wrong information or his advice was

> > > dangerous, which doesn't seem to be the case...why was he removed? He

> > > was consistently one of the listmates who would take the time and

> > > answer questions and look over hair result tests and immediatly reply

> > > to my questions which I completely appreciate. In my opinion he was an

> > > asset and I think a lot of us are confused as to why he was removed.

> > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

News of my uncommunicativeness/unreasonableness have been greatly

exaggerated? but not my impropriety, perhaps.. These groups are owned and

operated by people under the protocol they represent (of such propriety) It may

not represent libertarianism (Libertarianism usually doesn't represent

libertarianism, fully, as I understand It ) I *don't* believe a principled

person would sneak back under the guise of another identity, though, if it was

the truth of understanding they were about?

I would understand if Ross didn't return in that respect.. I wouldn't

either, being as principled as I am, Thereof? (Catch me lying and you've caught

me being a liar, which I feel is Universally Disassociating. Rather than

pretending that that is a principled option, I'd rather just implore the

moderators here to consider letting Ross say his peace to the

membership, (at least to thank everyone for being as principled as they are for

him?) and to reconsider reinstating his membership here based on the

consideration and goodwill that he seems to have earned in that respect? of such

principles I'd be thinking, but I do understand that it is your call Dana, and

the owners and operators of what message we would be conveying otherwise, as

little as I actually know of the accused/bounced in that respect, but hoping to

understand more of All (for such justness) Thereof.. .

Would it help (the *combatants,* perhaps?) if I said I'm sorry for the way

humanity is and that I will do my best to help make it better?/more meaningful?

(Fill in the blanks on how I aim to rectify the situation? , and ?)

because that's also what I mean in saying what I do and being what I am, what I

Feel I am.. .

I would expect as much for myself as anyone, of an outburst perhaps, that I am

not typically about but only human of in that respect? of what I am also if not

especially regretful about where not all that a human can be by admitting as

much.. in doing as much as usually can be done about it? of what is *Primary,*

Thereof

While I'm at it I would like to hear more directly from you Dana and all our,

moderators? (of Communication?) and feel you are wonderful if not ever so

inspiring (of doing what you feel you have to do for us, of a tough job indeed

-- and there is no doubt that enforcement/reinforcement is a primary issue, of

walking the walk, no doubt, of such principle.. my hat is off to you in that

respect) of saying all you do, that you do, which is more than I find on *most*

boards, oh yeah, (of another reason why we are here, Hello?) of the example I

believe you truly set (so maybe your call was an outburst, too? or could have

been.. .

Hey, I probably make more mistakes than anyone in getting to where I've gotten

to, of such principle/s, as it pertains to Communication? where they would be

mistakes in that respect (where I figure overt lying is the only thing that lets

people get away with how really abusive and bad they could be, otherwise.. .

I'd rather expose my enemy in dealing with them? where they are my enemy (of

setting such a fine example? with me on board of as much?) of making them my

friend/s (or associates) by as much, as good as that should prove in developing

the more meaningful behavior for one and All, Thereof

That would be just me of course, for one and All of as much, if not for more,

Thereof, of my having put my faith in as much, (of Communication being The

answer) I'd be thinking, as Feeling, of as much, so far, of Understanding More,

Thereof

Communication has more ways of dealing with the problem, of Communication? than,

we might realize, otherwise, is my sense of It of this, of as much

If we're all (some of us?) suggesting this *is* how we communicate, well, then,

I figure we have room for improvement and let's get on with It.. .

Glavic

My take on all this where you should be concerned about as much, but I wasn't

following the alleged argument or transgression/s, which I don't feel should

make such a big difference with respect to my point/s (with respect to my not

being drawn into so much trouble, perhaps.. .

>

> Below is general information that, at the direction of the list owner, I apply

consistently to everyone.

>

> I remove members from the group who will not follow the list rules, even after

repeated warning. Those who post obvious spam are not provided warnings.

>

> I don't remove people who give advice which I question or disagree with. Only

for violations of list rules.

>

> When I notice violations of list rules, I send private emails. I warn anyone

[except those who post obvious spam] that appears to be violating list rules.

>

> Banning anyone does not mean that the person can't just sign up again under a

different ID. Spammers do this all the time. So can anyone else.

>

> Dana

> [moderator]

>