Re: Implicating the censors and furthering abusers, re., Wakefield

[Guest guest]

Hello,

I'm into my sixth round (sixth week) of AC chelation and am not sensing anything

different yet, (especially different? that I even need to be chelating, but I

want to do it to better understand how my son will feel about it not wanting to

put him at risk, of his not being as verbal as I am) unless you see it here, in

this? of as much? .. .

That what I/we communicate wouldn't be a measure of as much?!. Where I come

in?!. on Understanding, that It wouldn't be about as much and what everything is

for, that anything would be so meaningful? or just

This link doesn't work probably because it goes into my email box (!) and

doesn't approve of that sort of thing (Thank goodness? that I should care? .. .

(The so honest and principled guy that I am?!. Some would think stupid, from

their reference point of war, and abuse, that I need that

I don't try to expose myself any more than I feel like doing so, don't worry,

about that? .. . I do what I Feel, for understanding more. I find that serves me

well, and that's a period.

I pasted the story (of the link) here so you got it anyway, censorship aside,

that I need that sort of BS ( " No, " if you're structured literally? .. .

Be more analytical and nothing should be such a problem?!. Was chelation

supposed to make me normal? I wasn't looking for that.. *Better* would be nice..

..

Mike Glavic

P.S. I'm not supporting promoting any new laws (or such?) until we understand

justice (and more, of All?) and serve it better, for one and All, Thereof

Yes, here's more than just hoping so (That I have anything to worry about with

that/this approach, that I should care about

>

> From Autism Canada Foundation

>

> Something identified as a *must read,* or so it would be, that the ASD

community especially wouldn't also like to be able to read it.. . is somewhat

where I come in for as much? .. .

>

> >

> October 15, 2010

>

> Dear ,

>

> By SALLY BECK

> October 15, 2010

>

> New American research shows that there could be a link between the

controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children.

>

> The study appears to confirm the findings of British doctor Wakefield,

who caused a storm in 1998 by suggesting a possible link.

>

> Now a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North

Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease -

and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus.

>

> Last night the team's leader, Dr , said: 'Of the handful of

results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.

>

> 'This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of

children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of

measles virus.

>

> 'What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr Wakefield and published in

1998 is correct. That study didn't draw any conclusions about specifically what

it means to find measles virus in the gut, but the implication is it may be

coming from the MMR vaccine. If that's the case, and this live virus is residing

in the gastrointestinal tract of some children, and then they have GI

inflammation and other problems, it may be related to the MMR.'

>

> The 1998 study by Dr Wakefield, then a reader in gastroenterology at the Royal

Free Hospital in North London, and 12 other doctors claimed to have found a new

bowel disease, autism enterocolitis.

>

> At the time, Dr Wakefield said that although they had not proved a link

between MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and autism, there was cause for concern

and the Government should offer the option single vaccines - instead of only

MMRs - until more research had been done.

>

> The paper - and the confused interpretation of its findings - caused uproar

and led to many parents withdrawing their co-operation for the triple jab. Ten

of the paper's authors also signed retractions on the interpretation but stood

by the science.

>

> This is the second independent study to back up Dr Wakefield. In 2001

O'Leary, Professor of Pathology at St 's Hospital and Trinity College,

Dublin, replicated his findings.

>

> Last night Dr Wakefield said: 'This new study confirms what we found in

British children and again with Professor O'Leary. The only exposure these

children have had to measles is through the MMR vaccine.

>

> 'They were developing normally until they regressed. They now suffer autism

and bowel disease.

>

> 'The Department of Health and some of the media wanted to dismiss our research

as insignificant. The excuse was that no one else had the same findings as us.

What they didn't say is that no one else had looked.'

>

> A spokesman for the Department of Health said they had not read the American

report, but added: 'MMR remains the best form of protection against measles,

mumps and rubella.'

>

> ------

>

> I'm thinking this has to do with a lot of other issues (as well)

>

> Glavic

>

> Censorship is the primary bullsh*t. Those who abuse freedom of expression can

be identified and weeded out (as stupid/abusive as they seem to be and are, so

obviously?!. or in need of help, Sh*t?) only *without* censorhship, (Hello) is

my sense of It (of the answer! (that I take jerk-haters seriously otherwise.

Bring 'em on?!?. I want to deal with them

>

> While we are on BS, it seems Wakefield was violated by a group. Do you think

politics can see beyond groups (of the BS " greater good? " ) towards the

Individual and All? of serving Justice in that respect? (That ABA, or any other

treatment, would matter) Here's more than hoping so.

>

> Oh, and there's also isolation therapy, (not necessarily the deep sleep, but

you know the kind? that keeps *you* sane, too?) where you don't get satisfaction

yourself, by as much?!. Actually, you're not nearly as alone as you might think

with isolation therapy, of why it works so well, (it usually includes a distant

nature?) is my sense of It. When you're sick of the BS, find your space?!.

You'll also be a lot more understanding for It is my sense of It, where it's

understanding more that you'd be interested in

>

> Here's trying to help an Individual named Wakefield, and us, Thereof,

that anything in between would matter? .. . To hell with groups otherwise

>

> You heard me right. Don't be expecting so much from another

>

> On Serving Justice. On How That's Done -- As without so much " censorship " as

We usually seem to resort to of our problem I'd be thinkin'

>

> That might not be your problem.. . anymore?!. Mike U?!.

>

> The thread seems to never end

>

> BWT.

>