Dr. Buttar appears to be vindicated of board harassment

[Guest guest]

Despite my personal views on the merits of what he is doing, it appears from

this article

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/31/1347104/reprimand-lets-doctor-contin\

ue.html

that Dr. Rashid Buttar was the unfortunate victim of malicious harassment by

evil criminals pretending to protect us while actually preventing sick people

from getting proper care. They had managed to get themselves appointed as the

licensing board.

While many corrupt licensing boards will babble about 'placebo controlled

trials,' they all know what they are implying is a Big Lie in the Hitlerian

sense. After all, the placebo controlled trial is a relatively modern

invention. Older therapies have not been subjected to it yet continue to be

used because it is generally accepted as unethical to deny them to the 'placebo'

arm of a trial when everyone knows they work. It is only therapies the board

wants to PRETEND don't work, and stop, precisely because they DO work (such as

chelation curing physician induced autism) that are the subject of this rule.

How do I know this? When the California medical board was being out of control

and persecuting alternative doctors for knowing what they were doing (complete

with armed police intimidating witnesses who wished to appear in the doctors'

favor), I attended a meeting, pointed out to the board members that there had

never been a controlled trial of general anesthesia to ameliorate surgical pain,

and invited them to organize a crossover trial of it and all volunteer as

subjects. The horrified looks on their faces made it clear they understood

perfectly well that general anesthesia works fine even though it has never been,

as they would say, " scientifically proven. "

No medical board member should be allowed to sit in judgment over any

alternative doctor based on whether a therapy is 'proven' until AFTER they have

been a subject in that clinical trial, getting cut once with anesthesia and once

without it, or have declined to receive anesthesia during major surgery. If the

board members don't believe in their own standards of determining which

treatments should be used, why should they be considered anything other than

evilly corrupt to impose those standards on others?

Andy

http://www.noamalgam.com/index.html

Amalgam Illness: Diagnosis and Treatment

http://www.noamalgam.com/hairtestbook.html

Hair Test Interpretation: Finding Hidden Toxicities

http://www.noamalgam.com/nourishinghope.html

Nourishing Hope for Autism: Nutrition Intervention for Healing Our Children

http://www.noamalgam.com/biologicaltreatments.html

Biological Treatments for Autism and PDD