Guest guest Posted November 19, 2010 Report Share Posted November 19, 2010 Dr Cutlet has said that starting ALA only or first is fine now. > > Dana, > > When i read your stories, i get bit curious that you started with ALA, why not DMSA.. Cutler protocol says start with DMSA to decrease the body burden and then add ALA. I have gone lot of stories of DMSA side effects and bit cautious about starting with DMSA > > Regards, > Sajeel. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2010 Report Share Posted November 19, 2010 Thanks but does not using ALA first alone increase the mercury in the body.? Regards, Sajeel On Sat Nov 20th, 2010 10:19 AM PKT ideals04 wrote: > >Dr Cutlet has said that starting ALA only or first is fine now. > >> >> Dana, >> >> When i read your stories, i get bit curious that you started with ALA, why not DMSA.. Cutler protocol says start with DMSA to decrease the body burden and then add ALA. I have gone lot of stories of DMSA side effects and bit cautious about starting with DMSA >> >> Regards, >> Sajeel. >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 Some people choose to use DMSA for the 3 months after exposure and then add the ALA. You can just wait out the first 3 months after exposure(vaccines, fillings) and use nothing and then start with just ALA. You don't have to ever use anything but ALA. If you have had no mercury exposure for the last 3 months then you may use ALA and you may also use DMSA but that is not necessary > >> > >> Dana, > >> > >> When i read your stories, i get bit curious that you started with ALA, why not DMSA.. Cutler protocol says start with DMSA to decrease the body burden and then add ALA. I have gone lot of stories of DMSA side effects and bit cautious about starting with DMSA > >> > >> Regards, > >> Sajeel. > >> > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 > Dana, > When i read your stories, i get bit curious that you started with ALA, why not DMSA.. I was not comfortable with the potential side effects of DMSA. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 so is not the ALA slow in removing mercury from body. It is more suited for brain. Does not it increases body burden . Regards, Sajeel On Sat Nov 20th, 2010 8:16 PM PKT danasview wrote: > >> Dana, >> When i read your stories, i get bit curious that you started with ALA, why not DMSA.. > > >I was not comfortable with the potential side effects of DMSA. > >Dana > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 ALA removes mercury from everywhere. It is a powerful chelator all by itself. Dr. Cutler says that when it is used with DMSA you can remove ~ 20-30% more metals. DMSA also works well on lead. TJ ________________________________ From: sajeel shafiq <sajeelshafiq@...> autism treatment Sent: Sat, November 20, 2010 7:31:45 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Re: Dana: Why not DMSA so is not the ALA slow in removing mercury from body. It is more suited for brain. Does not it increases body burden . Regards, Sajeel On Sat Nov 20th, 2010 8:16 PM PKT danasview wrote: > >> Dana, >> When i read your stories, i get bit curious that you started with ALA, why not >>DMSA.. > > >I was not comfortable with the potential side effects of DMSA. > >Dana > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.