Guest guest Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 go with Andy!Your child will be safe.It may take longer thats all. > > Hi > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > protocols. > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > days, rest and repeat every other week > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > test. > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > have and if you have had success, how > long a protocol like this last? .... > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > Thanks > > > -Daphnia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 the DAN! protocol is not a fast, quick-fix solution by any means. Any DAN! who tells you this is being deceptive. Using a chelator in more reasonable doses is less stressful on the organs, and using a chelator more frequently than 8 hours will minimize the amount of metal redistribution in the body as the blood levels of the chelator are kept at a constant level during a round. I just chose not to risk it... and went with the less convenient, but more scientifically/chemically/biomedically/physically reasonable option of low dose/high frequency chelation (aka Cutler protocol). I have never done an aggressive chelation protocol, although it has been recommended to me by prior DAN! doctors. I do know several parents who tried 8 hour DMSA chelation with disastrous results. Lots of regression. I see parents who abandon DAN! and I see those who, for some reason, continue despite the regressions. There are some still in the midst of a DAN! protocol after 5+ years. Going out on your own isn't expensive, but it requires diligence and patience and research (you should do this regardless). I think I spend $50/month on chelators and support supplements. My son has never regressed. Never had any negatives. I currently give 50mgs DMSA/25 mgs ALA (9yrs/65lbs); over 100 rounds completed. Started out nonverbal and out of touch and is now fully integrated in the 3rd grade classroom with a floating aide to keep him on task. Parents are surprised to learn he has a full blown ASD diagnosis from 2004. He had a sleep over last night with a typically developing friend who CALLED HIM to come over. Cool. There are no guarantees, but I feel I am doing the safest method possible at this point. Pam > > Hi > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > protocols. > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > days, rest and repeat every other week > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > test. > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > have and if you have had success, how > long a protocol like this last? .... > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > Thanks > > > -Daphnia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2010 Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 The Andy Cutler, Mark Schauss interview in the files section here might be helpful, particularly page 7, 2nd paragraph. Kenny. > > Hi > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > protocols. > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > days, rest and repeat every other week > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > test. > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > have and if you have had success, how > long a protocol like this last? .... > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > Thanks > > > -Daphnia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2010 Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 Well, I used only AC protocol for 3 years. My son is fully recovered. Two of my friends started AC protocol 2 years ago, without DAN! One 6yo girl lost her diagnosis, attends mainstream school without support, still has some mild speech delay which greatly improved in last half an year. The other 5yo girl had diagnosis " severe autism " 2 years ago - she will go to mainstream school this autumn, though still have some behavorial and speech problems - but rather like Asperger, not as severe autistic. Three other parents I know chose working with DAN! and did IV chelation for three years. Their children still profoundly autistic, attend special school... So my personal statistic does not prove DAN! protocol is any faster or more effective than AC protocol. Galina > > Hi > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > protocols. > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > days, rest and repeat every other week > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > test. > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > have and if you have had success, how > long a protocol like this last? .... > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > Thanks > > > -Daphnia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2010 Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 I appreciate the group and its efforts. I feel comfortable with chelation using the AC protocol because of you all. I'm a convert and my patients will benefit from it. I also recommend them to your group. Thank you, thank you. On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:00 PM, nikitasmom33 <nikitasmom33@...>wrote: > > > Well, I used only AC protocol for 3 years. My son is fully recovered. Two > of my friends started AC protocol 2 years ago, without DAN! One 6yo girl > lost her diagnosis, attends mainstream school without support, still has > some mild speech delay which greatly improved in last half an year. The > other 5yo girl had diagnosis " severe autism " 2 years ago - she will go to > mainstream school this autumn, though still have some behavorial and speech > problems - but rather like Asperger, not as severe autistic. > Three other parents I know chose working with DAN! and did IV chelation for > three years. Their children still profoundly autistic, attend special > school... > So my personal statistic does not prove DAN! protocol is any faster or more > effective than AC protocol. > Galina > > > > > > > Hi > > > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > > protocols. > > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > > days, rest and repeat every other week > > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > > test. > > > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his > stuff. > > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one > we > > have and if you have had success, how > > long a protocol like this last? .... > > > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -Daphnia > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2010 Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 Hello: We tried the higher dose DMSA oral with a DAN! 3 years ago. My son got very stimmy, aggressive, and whinny. I tried for several months, but he then started regressing in many areas and I gave it up. I went to IV chelation (weekly) for the past two years. My son pulled every week (per UTM's), but there didn't seem to be an end in sight and we were paying $336/week. On the positive side, he did not have the side effects and the IV glutathione seemed to help him. With IV's you know how much chelator is going in (since it goes in the vein directly) and you do not get the gut issues. I am now moving to the AC protocol. I am hoping with the lower dosing, we will not have the same issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2010 Report Share Posted April 20, 2010 Hi: Congratulations! Can you tell me how old your son was when you started? How many cycles did you do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 That is really wonderful to hear! Would chelation take care of OCD like behavior, anxiety and sound sensitivities? Are you still chelating? Has sleeping habits changed since doing the AC protocol? Would your son wake up on the " off " days? We would like to minimize the sleep disruption if possible. First round, took 10 minutes to wake my son up then 30 minutes for him to fall asleep afterwards. Thinking to start round 2 Friday morning and finish Sunday night. Would that work? I will go to school to give him the dosage on Fridays. Thanks for sharing! Kareen > > > > Hi > > > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > > protocols. > > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > > days, rest and repeat every other week > > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > > test. > > > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > > have and if you have had success, how > > long a protocol like this last? .... > > > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -Daphnia > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Well after four years of doing AC protocol and watching tons of parents report the ills of DAN protcol..or come to me for help fixing their children after using DAN protocol... DAN is a no go if you want to get your child back. If you want recovery....use AC. We have 97 rounds done on a used to be PDD Child. I can't really express the huge things that AC chelation has done for my son. He used to be really withdrawn, refuse affection...he wouldn't let me hold him. We did his first found at age 3 1/2 and on that round he let me hold him! The problem with DAN protocol is purely scientific. Chelators need to be used based upon their half life in the body. Simply, they wear off after a certain time. All substances or medications do that. DMSA lasts four hours in the body. Not 8. So every time you take chelator you free up heavy metals so there needs to be more chelator there to keep absorbing those metals. If there isn't, it resettles into the body/brain. the more times that happens, the more re-poisoned you get. This is why the DAN protocol produces horrible redistributions and side effect, in some case permanent regressions in some children. They also do not use alpha lipoic acid to remove brain mercury. You need a steady blood level of chelator for a minimum of three days/two nights followed by a break. And to use ALA at some point to clear brain mercury, otherwise, brain mercury can stay in there anywhere from 25 years to forever. If you don't remove it, you won't recover the child. Your DAN protocol..I hate to say what you list below will be a disaster. As a chelating adult it took me almost four years to be able to tolerate 50mg of dmsa on AC protocol. I can't imagine how terrible a child would feel taking 175mg orally every 8 hours. You can tell when it's wearing off and you need your next dose and it doesn't feel nice. Sadly, most of the children being chelated cannot tell you this. There is no FAST way to safely chelate. The DAN protocol isn't going to get you there faster, it isn't going to get you there at all. It's also very expensive compared to buying dmsa and ala yourself and doing low dose Cutler chelation. I have sadly seen so many parents post here over the years in dire panic because of the serious regressions their children have had doing improper DAN chelation. You do not need to do urine testing etc with AC chelation, you don't even need that doctor if he/she isn't willing to support you in doing AC chelation. Please also do not do any more of the DMSA suppository urine tests " DMSA challenge testing " these also cause unsafe redistribution and are not diagnostically significant. Trust you gut....go with AC chelation Jan > > Hi > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > protocols. > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > days, rest and repeat every other week > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > test. > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > have and if you have had success, how > long a protocol like this last? .... > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > Thanks > > > -Daphnia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Hi Jan we do exactly what u say and have done 4 rounds now on our 5 year old girl when you say 3 days 2 nights is minimumm, do you think we should do more than that really? becasue we do friday morning to sunday evening - so exactly 3 days and 2 nights - is it too little? it is just convenient becasue it misses school, and is the same days every week could we do more do u think, and if so what? thanks peter From: mercurybabies2@... Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:05:11 +0000 Subject: [ ] Re: CHELATION: DAN PROTOCOL VS CUTLER PROTOCOL Well after four years of doing AC protocol and watching tons of parents report the ills of DAN protcol..or come to me for help fixing their children after using DAN protocol... DAN is a no go if you want to get your child back. If you want recovery....use AC. We have 97 rounds done on a used to be PDD Child. I can't really express the huge things that AC chelation has done for my son. He used to be really withdrawn, refuse affection...he wouldn't let me hold him. We did his first found at age 3 1/2 and on that round he let me hold him! The problem with DAN protocol is purely scientific. Chelators need to be used based upon their half life in the body. Simply, they wear off after a certain time. All substances or medications do that. DMSA lasts four hours in the body. Not 8. So every time you take chelator you free up heavy metals so there needs to be more chelator there to keep absorbing those metals. If there isn't, it resettles into the body/brain. the more times that happens, the more re-poisoned you get. This is why the DAN protocol produces horrible redistributions and side effect, in some case permanent regressions in some children. They also do not use alpha lipoic acid to remove brain mercury. You need a steady blood level of chelator for a minimum of three days/two nights followed by a break. And to use ALA at some point to clear brain mercury, otherwise, brain mercury can stay in there anywhere from 25 years to forever. If you don't remove it, you won't recover the child. Your DAN protocol..I hate to say what you list below will be a disaster. As a chelating adult it took me almost four years to be able to tolerate 50mg of dmsa on AC protocol. I can't imagine how terrible a child would feel taking 175mg orally every 8 hours. You can tell when it's wearing off and you need your next dose and it doesn't feel nice. Sadly, most of the children being chelated cannot tell you this. There is no FAST way to safely chelate. The DAN protocol isn't going to get you there faster, it isn't going to get you there at all. It's also very expensive compared to buying dmsa and ala yourself and doing low dose Cutler chelation. I have sadly seen so many parents post here over the years in dire panic because of the serious regressions their children have had doing improper DAN chelation. You do not need to do urine testing etc with AC chelation, you don't even need that doctor if he/she isn't willing to support you in doing AC chelation. Please also do not do any more of the DMSA suppository urine tests " DMSA challenge testing " these also cause unsafe redistribution and are not diagnostically significant. Trust you gut....go with AC chelation Jan > > Hi > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > protocols. > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > days, rest and repeat every other week > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > test. > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > have and if you have had success, how > long a protocol like this last? .... > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > Thanks > > > -Daphnia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 A born-again chelator. Cool. > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > > > protocols. > > > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > > > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > > > days, rest and repeat every other week > > > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > > > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > > > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > > > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > > > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > > > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > > > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > > > test. > > > > > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his > > stuff. > > > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > > > > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one > > we > > > have and if you have had success, how > > > long a protocol like this last? .... > > > > > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > -Daphnia > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Hi Ideally you would do 3 days and 3 nights - so you would start Fri am and finish same time Monday. Many people do similar to you because of kids going off to school etc. We start as soon as I get home Friday, say 5pm, and give the last dose about 8.30am Monday - but if the Monday happens to be a holiday I'd just extend by a couple of doses. Kind regards, Alison W > > > > Hi > > > > Please can you comment on your experiences with either of the chelation > > protocols. > > I know Cutler is safer and slower. My DAN protocol is more agressive > > DMSA 175mg oral (every 8 hours) and DMSA suppositories (1/ day) for three > > days, rest and repeat every other week > > for a 44 lb child (4 yo). > > I have not started yet, but the DAN is protocol is very expensive (around > > 400 every two months if my husband understood correctly > > I though it was 200). Insurance I do not think they feel they want to pay > > since my DAN has not contacted them justifying the > > use of chelation. I am worried about safety, too. I have done previously > > the DMSA suppositories (6 rounds), and I hate the 6 hour urine collection > > test. > > > > I read Andy protocol and I feel comfortable that he seems to know his stuff. > > It is a long term protocol tho, which is ok > > > > I would like to know if you have done the DAN protocol similar to the one we > > have and if you have had success, how > > long a protocol like this last? .... > > > > Any opinions would be appreciated > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -Daphnia > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 > > That is really wonderful to hear! Would chelation take care of OCD >like behavior, anxiety and sound sensitivities? Are you still >chelating? Actually, I chelated for two and a half years and stopped. Now I started again just because I started chelating myself, so it is easy to do for both of us. He does not need this for any behavioral problems, the only my reason to keep chelating him - he still needs GFCF diet. And once Dana said someone got rid of celiac decease after long chelation. I still hope for that. Chelation helped a lot but additionally he needed antiviral treatment and adrenal support. OCD usually caused by viruses. And anxiety and sound sensitivities might be because of adrenal weakness. Or yeasts. My son's yeasts issues went away after about 20 rounds. > Has sleeping habits changed since doing the AC protocol? Would >your son wake up on the " off " days? We would like to minimize the >sleep disruption if possible. First round, took 10 minutes to wake >my son up then 30 minutes for him to fall asleep afterwards. I was lucky with that. He got used to night doses pretty quickly, so I did not have to wake him up. At the beginning I used syringe, just lifted his head, injected solution into his mouth and waited until he would swallow it. Now I use small egg cup and he drinks it without opening his eyes. I tried to give him capsules at night but that was too disturbing, he would have to wake up enough to swallow it. So I went back to egg cups. > Thinking to start round 2 Friday morning and finish Sunday night. Would that work? I will go to school to give him the dosage on Fridays. Yes, this will be fine. Good luck with your round 2! Galina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.