Guest guest Posted August 4, 2010 Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 Sure, clearly some people seem to be more susceptible. BUT, if you put enough toxins in anyone, deplete them of their natural abilities to fight these toxins (by using antibiotics, poor nutrition, etc, etc) something very serious will go wrong. If the increase trend continue, in about 25 years every child will have autism. To me, that doesn't make the genetic susceptibility argument very meaningful. Anita > > http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2010/08/congress-learns-that-autism-is.ht\ ml > Pay close attention around 27:00 mark. > It is NOT just environment and it is NOT just genetics. It is BOTH and the environment triggers the genes at moments of susceotibility, which is what I have said all along!!!! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2010 Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 Anita, I agree. Like I said, by the time the mainstream concedes that toxins of all sorts are the culprit and THEIR OWN children and grandchildren are affected, it will be too late for all of us. I have noticed mainstream Dr.s who were hard core against the autism/mercury hypothesis until it happened to their own child. The sad part was that one Dr. I met --it happened to his son, and he was even ostracized at work by the other doctors. " When all is said and done, in the end, there will be more doctors in hell than all the generals who ever lived. " (Napoleon Bonaparte). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.