Re: What I said to a psychology/psychiatry? based group (roundaboutly?

[Guest guest]

Worth repeating?

The diagnosing you could be getting from a political establishment (including

what you are getting for your children?) is no better than the fundamental

interests of your diagnostician. (Question as much?) Consumer beware, especially

where they are not about communicating the primary facts, that we need a world

of illusion, (of artifact?) or politics otherwise of justice if not such

justness

Question *your* diagnosis? for those you care for? I would if I were you.. .

Evaluate based on the *merits,* (such evidence?) of as much, I implore you/us.

I'd say people not so open and honest and direct represent the *real* problem

(with America? if not the world as we know it?) we are having with our

world/society. That's a period?!. OK, a bit more than that, I Feel as understand

That I have any use for a diagnosis otherwise [Not]

Evaluate based on what censors or not of what is primary to Communication and a

greater Understanding?!.

My advice for Us, that anything else so meaningful could happen

Yo/Hello,

What I said to a psychology/psychiatry? based group (roundaboutly, with respect

to its leader's accusation that I don't communicate very well, with regard to my

impressing upon it the need for psychology (mental/emotional humanity?) to take

up the gauntlet of encompassing justice into its domain, that anything else

should matter with respect to a social order?!. (or psychology?) That anything

else should matter

It didn't want any part of that and said I was out of order with respect to what

science encompasses and should encompass [seriously]

Where you'd be interested in as much? that I should take us so seriously.. .

that *justness* isn't the thing (Thereof?!. But I Feel It Is

Hi Steve, (Where Jay is the actual leader that stifles/censors messages to its

board

You're with a delusional group that censors to hear what it wants to hear and

believe and lacking of such basic communication skills and content otherwise (of

such objectivity?!.). You're not getting the big picture in coming to your

conclusions/analysis, I Feel as Understand.. .

Thanks where you were trying to be helpful with respect to your communicating

with me/Communication

Glavic

Analyst (Leader/Ruler of my world? .. . What else, and what I wish for you, too

They won't post me otherwise. Who's the one with a problem in that picture (with

regard to the primary facts?) I'll leave up to you

Let's hear it for me?!. That I have to tell us everything? I Feel? .. . That I

have to speak for my self, given what I've discovered about a world otherwise..

.. Don't be trusting your professionals or politicians any more than anyone else,

(than you have to?) that the merits aren't in the analysis, (of Communication?)

but I Feel It Is.. .

Is there such a thing as a " grand " analyst, I'm wondering, for my self? .. . I

haven't found one unless I'm It?!. No, not the Big It

Sheesh. I'm not that arrogant or delusional.. . And I wish others wouldn't be

either, especially those who should understand better, given their education and

titles and position in society, you understand, what you understand.. .

On covering more of the bases? I Am, so just (I Feel so just.. . !

Give It time, you'll see how It/that works?!.

BWT

>

> Yo/Hello,

>

> What I said to a psychology/psychiatry? based group (roundaboutly, with

respect to its leader's accusation that I don't communicate very well, with

regard to my impressing upon it the need for psychology (mental/emotional

humanity?) to take up the gauntlet of encompassing justice into its domain, that

anything else should matter with respect to a social order?!. (or psychology?)

That anything else should matter

>

> It didn't want any part of that and said I was out of order with respect to

what science encompasses and should encompass [seriously]

>

> Where you'd be interested in as much? that I should take us so seriously.. .

that *justness* isn't the thing (Thereof?!. But I Feel It Is

>

>

>

>

> Hi Steve, (Where Jay is the actually leader that stifles/censors messages to

its board

>

>

>

> You're with a delusional group that censors to hear what it wants to hear and

believe and lacking of such basic communication skills and content otherwise (of

such objectivity?!.). You're not getting the big picture in coming to your

conclusions/analysis, I Feel as Understand.. .

>

>

>

> Thanks where you were trying to be helpful with respect to your communicating

with me/Communication

>

>

>

> Glavic

>

>

>

> Analyst (Leader/Ruler of my world? .. . What else, and what I wish for you,

too

>

>

> They won't post me otherwise. Who's the one with a problem in that picture

(with regard to the primary facts?) I'll leave up to you

>

> Let's hear it for me?!. That I have to tell us everything? I Feel? .. . That I

have to speak for my self, given what I've discovered about a world otherwise..

.. Don't be trusting your professionals or politicians any more than anyone else,

(than you have to?) that the merits aren't in the analysis, (of Communication?)

but I Feel It Is.. .

>

> Is there such a thing as a " grand " analyst, I'm wondering, for my self? .. . I

haven't found one unless I'm It?!. No, not the Big It

>

> Sheesh. I'm not that arrogant or delusional.. . And I wish others wouldn't be

either, especially those who should understand better, given their education and

titles and position in society, you understand, what you understand.. .

>

> On covering more of the bases? I Am, so just (I Feel so just.. . !

>

> Give It time, you'll see how It/that works?!.

>

> BWT

>