Re: Hair Test Results - Confusion

[Guest guest]

Hi Ken

It might be worth posting the tests here in the hair test file so that we can

have a look and attempt an opinion.

All the best

Kenny

>

> Hi All,

>

> We are about to commence our first round in the coming fortnight but are now

having second thoughts. We suspected Mecury as our sons first hair test in June

2009 showed Mecury at 4.8 (100% band) where the reference range was <0.40. At

the time his blood test showed Mecury of 52 nmol/L (Range 0-60). This was at

the time of his diagnosis.

>

> Have recently conducted the Counting rules he did not meet the criteria for

improper mineral transportation.

>

> I have also conducted the counting rules test on a hair sample from Jan 2010

and this time around the Mecury is down to 0.80 from the previous 4.8, still

above the reference range. Again he did not meet the criteria to indicate

improper mineral transportation.

>

> My question is, is he affected by Mecury - Any recommendations/advice

welcomed.

>

> Ken Yazici

> Dad to Adem 3.5yrs ASD

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Kenny,

Thanks for the suggestion. I have uploaded the files to the following directory

'A Yazici Hair Tests'. Would appreciate any feedback.

Thanking you in advance.

Ken - Dad to Adem

> >

> > Hi All,

> >

> > We are about to commence our first round in the coming fortnight but are now

having second thoughts. We suspected Mecury as our sons first hair test in June

2009 showed Mecury at 4.8 (100% band) where the reference range was <0.40. At

the time his blood test showed Mecury of 52 nmol/L (Range 0-60). This was at

the time of his diagnosis.

> >

> > Have recently conducted the Counting rules he did not meet the criteria for

improper mineral transportation.

> >

> > I have also conducted the counting rules test on a hair sample from Jan 2010

and this time around the Mecury is down to 0.80 from the previous 4.8, still

above the reference range. Again he did not meet the criteria to indicate

improper mineral transportation.

> >

> > My question is, is he affected by Mecury - Any recommendations/advice

welcomed.

> >

> > Ken Yazici

> > Dad to Adem 3.5yrs ASD

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Ken

The 1st test without trying to state the obvious would certainly warrant at

least a trial of chelation adhering strictly to Andy's protocol as the mercury

is through the roof.

Antimony, and Aluminium being high on both tests may also suggest mercury as

mercury often causes the retention of these metals.

The ratios appear to be quite good with the adrenals just about being in range

and a fast metabolism suggested by these tests.

Lead being in the yellow may possibly be significant other wise there is not

really much else to say from what I can notice.

IMO chelation is definitely worth ago providing there are no on going exposures

and supporting supps are given.

All the best

Kenny

> > >

> > > Hi All,

> > >

> > > We are about to commence our first round in the coming fortnight but are

now having second thoughts. We suspected Mecury as our sons first hair test in

June 2009 showed Mecury at 4.8 (100% band) where the reference range was <0.40.

At the time his blood test showed Mecury of 52 nmol/L (Range 0-60). This was at

the time of his diagnosis.

> > >

> > > Have recently conducted the Counting rules he did not meet the criteria

for improper mineral transportation.

> > >

> > > I have also conducted the counting rules test on a hair sample from Jan

2010 and this time around the Mecury is down to 0.80 from the previous 4.8,

still above the reference range. Again he did not meet the criteria to indicate

improper mineral transportation.

> > >

> > > My question is, is he affected by Mecury - Any recommendations/advice

welcomed.

> > >

> > > Ken Yazici

> > > Dad to Adem 3.5yrs ASD

> > >

> >

>